Pregnant nurses' occupational stress and associated factors: A comparative cross-sectional study with other healthcare workers, physical workers, and desk workers.

Marie Hino, Yasuhiko Ebina, Rika Yano
Author Information
  1. Marie Hino: Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan. ORCID
  2. Yasuhiko Ebina: Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan. ORCID
  3. Rika Yano: Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan. ORCID

Abstract

AIM: To examine occupational stress levels and associated factors among pregnant nurses through a comparison with pregnant non-nurses.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 1060 working pregnant women. Participants completed questionnaires including the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire, work conditions, obstetric conditions, Sense of Coherence Scale, and self-management behaviors questionnaire. The participants were categorized into four groups: nurses, other healthcare workers, physical workers, and desk workers. Comparisons were made between the four groups and by gestational ages using Dunnett's test and chi-squared test, and associated factors were examined using ordinal logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Analysis of 847 valid responses showed that the nurse group had a higher occupational stress, higher job demand, and lower job control at any gestational age than the other profession groups. Nurses' occupational stress was associated with factors such as frequent overtime work, fewer break times, lower manager support, and lower prioritizing the fetus. Particularly, fewer break times and lower prioritizing the fetus were nurse-specific associated factors.
CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that pregnant nurses are exposed to higher occupational stress throughout the entire pregnancy than other occupations. The stress was related to modifiable factors such as fewer break times and lower prioritizing the fetus. To manage occupational stress, pregnant nurses should avoid overtime, take breaks, and prioritize the fetus in the workplace. Hospital administrators would need to provide work coordination support and consider certain regulations regarding hazardous work restrictions for pregnant nurses. Future cohort studies are required to better understand occupational stress among pregnant nurses.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2021 Apr 24;3:100028 [PMID: 38746725]
  2. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2023 Mar;55(2):494-505 [PMID: 36345776]
  3. Reprod Health. 2023 Oct 31;20(1):161 [PMID: 37907929]
  4. Ind Health. 2014;52(6):535-40 [PMID: 24975108]
  5. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 16;147(8):573-7 [PMID: 17938396]
  6. Occup Environ Med. 2013 Dec;70(12):845-51 [PMID: 24142992]
  7. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2011 May;25(3):246-54 [PMID: 21470264]
  8. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;221(6):563-576 [PMID: 31276631]
  9. Sleep Breath. 2018 Dec;22(4):1221-1231 [PMID: 29959635]
  10. Am J Ind Med. 2014 Feb;57(2):214-21 [PMID: 24166790]
  11. Perm J. 2008 Summer;12(3):25-34 [PMID: 21331207]
  12. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 10;19(10): [PMID: 35627328]
  13. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 20;16(23): [PMID: 31756951]
  14. Ginekol Pol. 2018;89(2):102-106 [PMID: 29512815]
  15. J Occup Environ Med. 2008 May;50(5):590-2 [PMID: 18469629]
  16. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Apr;11(4):QC06-QC10 [PMID: 28571212]
  17. BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 4;20(1):174 [PMID: 32019535]
  18. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Nov;87:60-68 [PMID: 30055374]
  19. BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 21;23(1):769 [PMID: 37865748]
  20. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;55(5):635-640 [PMID: 27751407]
  21. BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 23;23(1):2316 [PMID: 37993815]
  22. PLoS One. 2020 Jun 12;15(6):e0234579 [PMID: 32530956]
  23. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2025 Apr;22(2):e70000 [PMID: 39980228]
  24. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Jun;59(6):460-6 [PMID: 15911640]
  25. J Res Nurs. 2019 Nov;24(7):488-497 [PMID: 34394566]
  26. Am J Ind Med. 2007 Sep;50(9):664-75 [PMID: 17676587]
  27. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2014 Nov;87(8):835-49 [PMID: 24584887]
  28. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Dec;124:104092 [PMID: 34689012]
  29. Nurs Res. 2016 May-Jun;65(3):170-8 [PMID: 27124253]
  30. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Mar;91:70-76 [PMID: 30677590]
  31. Nurs Open. 2023 Sep;10(9):5827-5837 [PMID: 37219069]
  32. Nurs Open. 2024 Apr;11(4):e2158 [PMID: 38641902]
  33. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2015;28(1):8-19 [PMID: 26159942]
  34. Clin Endosc. 2016 May;49(3):266-72 [PMID: 26898513]
  35. Heliyon. 2021 May;7(5):e07035 [PMID: 33997362]
  36. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;222(3):224-238 [PMID: 31550447]

Grants

  1. JP23H03179/Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
Cross-Sectional Studies
Adult
Occupational Stress
Pregnancy
Surveys and Questionnaires
Health Personnel
Nurses

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0occupationalstresspregnantnursesworkersassociatedfactorslowerworkfetusstudyhigherfewerbreaktimesprioritizingamongcross-sectionalwomenconditionsfourhealthcarephysicaldeskgroupsgestationalusingtestshowednursejobovertimesupportAIM:examinelevelscomparisonnon-nursesMETHODS:included1060workingParticipantscompletedquestionnairesincludingBriefJobStressQuestionnaireobstetricSenseCoherenceScaleself-managementbehaviorsquestionnaireparticipantscategorizedgroups:ComparisonsmadeagesDunnett'schi-squaredexaminedordinallogisticregressionanalysisRESULTS:Analysis847validresponsesgroupdemandcontrolageprofessionNurses'frequentmanagerParticularlynurse-specificCONCLUSIONS:exposedthroughoutentirepregnancyoccupationsrelatedmodifiablemanageavoidtakebreaksprioritizeworkplaceHospitaladministratorsneedprovidecoordinationconsidercertainregulationsregardinghazardousrestrictionsFuturecohortstudiesrequiredbetterunderstandPregnantnurses'factors:comparativemidwifehealth

Similar Articles

Cited By