Status of scientific research integrity knowledge in dental undergraduates from 34 universities in China.

Xiaojin Wu, Tongxin Zheng, Yufei Nie, Jingyi Wu, Jirong Chen, Janak L Pathak, Lihong Wu
Author Information
  1. Xiaojin Wu: Department of Basic Oral Medicine, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510812, China.
  2. Tongxin Zheng: Department of Basic Oral Medicine, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510812, China.
  3. Yufei Nie: Foshan Stomatology Hospital, School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, 528000, China.
  4. Jingyi Wu: Department of Clinical Medicine, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515063, China.
  5. Jirong Chen: Department of Periodontology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510812, China.
  6. Janak L Pathak: Department of Basic Oral Medicine, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510812, China. j.pathak@gzhmu.edu.cn.
  7. Lihong Wu: Department of Basic Oral Medicine, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510812, China. wcanhong@163.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the status of research integrity knowledge among dental undergraduates from 34 Chinese universities in 5 key demographic regions.
METHODS: Questionnaires regarding the status of research integrity, including perception, attitude, and firsthand experience of scientific research integrity, were distributed to dental undergraduates of 34 Chinese universities. These universities were from 5 key demographic regions of China, i.e., eastern, western, northern, southern, and central. The questionnaires filled out by 1514 participants were further analyzed.
RESULTS: The results showed that among the participants, nearly 70% acquire scientific integrity knowledge through courses, as well as ideological and political education, while the remaining students acquire scientific integrity knowledge through other means, such as books and conferences. From the attitude perspective, most students (80-90%) oppose scientific misconduct. However, a few students also have an insufficient understanding of scientific misconduct and still need to improve their scientific research integrity training further. We also found that the research integrity training and the surrounding research environment affect students' attitudes and self-behavior regarding scientific integrity.
CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the ethical academic and research environment, implementation of scientific integrity courses in the curriculum, and proper supervision are vital in improving scientific research integrity knowledge in dental undergraduates in Chinese universities.

Keywords

References

  1. Science. 2013 Nov 29;342(6162):1019 [PMID: 24288301]
  2. Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Jan 27;27(1):5 [PMID: 33502635]
  3. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Jun;26(3):1827-1845 [PMID: 32297134]
  4. Sci Eng Ethics. 2023 Jul 20;29(4):28 [PMID: 37470823]
  5. Eur J Dent Educ. 2012 Feb;16(1):e180-6 [PMID: 22251343]
  6. Dan Med J. 2018 Apr;65(4): [PMID: 29619924]
  7. Account Res. 2021 Aug;28(6):331-348 [PMID: 33119408]
  8. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2018;138(4):465-471 [PMID: 29607990]
  9. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Aug;25(4):1271-1301 [PMID: 29721845]
  10. Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2020 Dec;33(2):42-54 [PMID: 33815023]
  11. BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jun 28;23(1):482 [PMID: 37380977]
  12. Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 29;13(1):16371 [PMID: 37773192]
  13. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Aug;24(4):1023-1034 [PMID: 29855866]
  14. Acad Med. 2022 Jan 1;97(1):13-17 [PMID: 34524130]
  15. J Prof Nurs. 1995 Jul-Aug;11(4):213-9 [PMID: 7665796]
  16. Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Jul 9;27(4):47 [PMID: 34244889]
  17. Acad Med. 1992 Nov;67(11):769-75 [PMID: 1418260]
  18. Med Educ. 2013 Feb;47(2):144-53 [PMID: 23323653]
  19. J Med Ethics. 2010 May;36(5):315-8 [PMID: 20439329]
  20. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):357-382 [PMID: 29441445]
  21. Forensic Sci Res. 2020 Jun 10;5(2):174-187 [PMID: 32939434]
  22. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 May;204(5):911-2 [PMID: 25905924]
  23. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Aug 17;81:104384 [PMID: 36042923]
  24. Life Sci Soc Policy. 2019 Jun 10;15(1):5 [PMID: 31179512]
  25. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2016 Jan-Apr;29(1):56 [PMID: 26996801]
  26. Comput Inform Nurs. 2006 May-Jun;24(3):144-9; quiz 150-1 [PMID: 16707944]
  27. Forensic Sci Int. 2000 Sep 11;113(1-3):511-4 [PMID: 10978672]
  28. Ann Hepatol. 2022 Jan-Feb;27(1):100655 [PMID: 35067358]
  29. Nature. 2019 Jun;570(7759):5 [PMID: 31160744]
  30. Rev Bras Enferm. 2022 Feb 02;75(3):e20210060 [PMID: 35137881]
  31. Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Dec;21(6):1657-72 [PMID: 25488333]
  32. Account Res. 2017;24(6):367-372 [PMID: 28548866]
  33. Eur J Dent Educ. 2015 Aug;19(3):177-84 [PMID: 25661035]
  34. J Dent Educ. 2016 Jan;80(1):5-13 [PMID: 26729679]
  35. J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Dec 04;38(47):e405 [PMID: 38050915]
  36. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 04;4:MR000038 [PMID: 27040721]
  37. Aust Occup Ther J. 2018 Aug;65(4):285-294 [PMID: 29635735]
  38. Comput Inform Nurs. 2004 May-Jun;22(3):132-42; quiz 143-4 [PMID: 15520582]
  39. Cell Biol Educ. 2005 Winter;4(4):330-4 [PMID: 16341260]
  40. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2017 Jan 2;45(1):53-59 [PMID: 27357493]
  41. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Feb;44(2):207-209 [PMID: 34974962]
  42. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Feb;26(1):127-139 [PMID: 30604355]
  43. Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 Jun 30;28(4):30 [PMID: 35771286]
  44. PLoS One. 2009 May 29;4(5):e5738 [PMID: 19478950]
  45. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2020 Oct;15(4):320-329 [PMID: 32532174]
  46. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2018 Jul-Sep;30(3):443-448 [PMID: 30465383]
  47. Comput Inform Nurs. 2004 May-Jun;22(3):145-52 [PMID: 15520584]
  48. J Dent Res. 2008 Mar;87(3):197 [PMID: 18296600]

MeSH Term

China
Humans
Male
Female
Adult
Scientific Misconduct
Surveys and Questionnaires
Universities
Schools, Dental
Ethics, Research
Students, Dental
Curriculum
Knowledge

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0integrityresearchscientificknowledgeuniversitiesdentalundergraduates34Chinesestudentsmisconductstatusamong5keydemographicregionsregardingattitudeChinaparticipantsacquirecoursesalsotrainingenvironmentResearchBACKGROUND:studyinvestigatedMETHODS:Questionnairesincludingperceptionfirsthandexperiencedistributedieeasternwesternnorthernsoutherncentralquestionnairesfilled1514analyzedRESULTS:resultsshowednearly70%wellideologicalpoliticaleducationremainingmeansbooksconferencesperspective80-90%opposeHoweverinsufficientunderstandingstillneedimprovefoundsurroundingaffectstudents'attitudesself-behaviorCONCLUSION:findingsindicateethicalacademicimplementationcurriculumpropersupervisionvitalimprovingStatusFabricationFalsificationPlagiarismQuestionablepractices

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.