Total Anatomical Nasal Skeletal Reconstruction Using a New Autologous Graft: The Tent Shaped Fibular Contoured Bone Graft.

Devisha Agarwal, Rishabh Agarwal, Rajiv Agarwal
Author Information
  1. Devisha Agarwal: Department of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.
  2. Rishabh Agarwal: King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.
  3. Rajiv Agarwal: Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India. drrajivagarwal@gmail.com. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of the bony nasal dorsum is a challenge due to the unique anatomy of the nasal bones. The nasal bones by virtue of their shape, angulation and size provide an aesthetic and pleasing contour of the upper nose. The anatomy of the nasal bones can get deformed in many situations like congenital anomalies, iatrogenic and post-traumatic situations leading to nasal deformity. Many options for reconstruction of nasal dorsum are available including soft tissue and bony material. It is always desirable to reconstruct like tissue with like tissue. This paper describes the use of a cored out tent shaped fibular graft for total reconstruction of the bony nose dorsum.
METHODS: A bony defect-appropriate full thickness segment of the fibula was harvested. This was contoured and cored out to mimic the appearance and angulation of the bilateral articulated nasal bones. The bone graft extends from the radix to the upper part of the lateral cartilage. This graft was inserted into a pocket created under the nasal dorsum to recreate the normal appearance and slope of the nose. The graft if needed may be fixed to the underlying bone using a screw.
RESULTS: A total of 20 patients with total destruction of the bony nasal vault were operated using this technique from 2017 to 2021. The average dimensions of a fibular graft are a length of 4.5 cm, a width of 12 mm and a thickness of 3 mm. Only 4 out of 20 patients required fixation with a screw. All patients reported significant improvement in the appearance and profile of their nose after surgery. The visual analogue scale revealed a Gaussian normal distribution curve (range, 0.5 to 10) with a significant improvement and p value <0.05. There has been an improvement in the mean nasofrontal and nasofacial angles postoperatively. The complications have been minimal and temporary.
CONCLUSION: The specially contoured fibular bone graft most closely mimics the natural shape and contour of the nasal bones and hence gives satisfactory results with minimal intraoperative manoeuvring and sculpturing and has natural stability owing to the unique shape that often obviates the need of fixation to the underlying skeleton. This type of graft is suitable in cases where total nasal reconstruction of the bony dorsum is desired.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Keywords

References

  1. Dresner HS, Hilger PA. An overview of nasal dorsal augmentation. Semin Plast Surg. 2008;22(2):65–73. [DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1063566]
  2. Sajjadian A, Rubinstein R, Naghshineh N. Current status of grafts and implants in rhinoplasty: Part I Autologous grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:40e–9e. [DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c82f12]
  3. Romo T, Sclafani AP, Jacono AA. Nasal reconstruction using porous polyethylene implants. Facial Plast Surg. 2000;16:55–61. [DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-7326]
  4. Gryskiewicz JM. Waste not, want not: the use of AlloDerm in secondary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:1999–2004. [DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000191180.77028.7a]
  5. Celik M, Haliloglu T, Baycin N. Bone chips and diced cartilage: an anatomically adopted graft for the nasal dorsum. Aesth Plast Surg. 2004;28:8–12. [DOI: 10.1007/s00266-004-3082-x]
  6. Byrd HS, Hobar PC. Alloplastic nasal and perialar augmentation. Clin Plast Surg. 1996;23:315–26. [DOI: 10.1016/S0094-1298(20)31120-2]
  7. Sherris DA, Kern EB. The versatile autogenous rib graft in septorhinoplasty. Am J Rhinol. 1998;12:221–7. [DOI: 10.2500/105065898781390136]
  8. Niechajev I. Porous polyethylene implants for nasal reconstruction: clinical and histologic studies. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1999;23:395–402. [DOI: 10.1007/s002669900308]
  9. Lovice DB, Mingrone MD, Toriumi DM. Rhinoplasty and septoplasty. Grafts and implants in rhinoplasty and nasal reconstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1999;32:113–41. [DOI: 10.1016/S0030-6665(05)70118-3]
  10. Clark RP, Wong G, Johnson LM, et al. Nasal dorsum augmentation with freeze-dried allograft bone. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1312–25. [DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b5a55b]
  11. Daniel RK, Calvert JW. Diced cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:2156–71. [DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000122544.87086.B9]
  12. Erol OO. The Turkish delight: a pliable graft for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:2229–41. [DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200005000-00051]
  13. Jackson IT, Choi HY, Clay R, et al. Long-term follow-up of cranial bone graft in dorsal nasal augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:1869–73. [DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199811000-00010]
  14. Guruprasad Y, Chauhan DS. Cortical tibial bone graft for nasal augmentation. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2012;11(2):186–90. [DOI: 10.1007/s12663-011-0297-7]
  15. Beppu M, Hanel DP, Johnston GH, Carmo JM, Tsai T-M. The osteocutaneous fibula flap: an anatomic study. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1992;8:215–23. [DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1006703]
  16. Attia S, Wiltfang J, Pons-Kuhnemann J, Wilbrand JF, Streckbein P, Kahling C, Howaldt HP, Schaaf H. Survival of dental implants placed in vascularised fibula free flaps after jaw reconstruction. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg. 2018;46:1205–10. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.05.008]
  17. Ling XF, Peng X. What is the price to pay for a free fibula flap? A systematic review of donor-site morbidity following free fibula flap surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:657–74. [DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182402d9a]
  18. Attia S, Diefenbach J, Schmermund D, Böttger S, Pons-Kühnemann J, Scheibelhut C, Heiss C, Howaldt HP. Donor-site morbidity after fibula transplantation in head and neck tumor patients: a split-leg retrospective study with focus on leg stability and quality of life. Cancers. 2020;12(8):2217. [DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082217]
  19. Bernstein JL, Reeve G, Kutler DI, Spector JA. Use of banked fibula for improved nasal reconstruction following free fibula midface reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000009971 . [DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009971]
  20. Cil Y. Fibular bone graft for nasal septal reconstruction: a case report. World J Plast Surg. 2017;6(2):220–4. [PMID: 28713714]
  21. Karadag D, Ozdol NC, Beriat K, Akinci T. CT evaluation of the bony nasal pyramid dimensions in Anatolian people. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40(3):160–4. [DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/35578628]
  22. Vail TP, Urbaniak JR. Donor-site morbidity with use of vascularized autogenous fibular grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(2):204–11. [DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199602000-00006]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0nasalgraftbonydorsumbonesnosereconstructiontotalshapeliketissuefibularappearancebonepatientsimprovementReconstructionuniqueanatomyangulationcontouruppersituationscoredfullthicknesscontourednormalunderlyingusingscrew2045mmfixationsignificantminimalnaturalNasalBoneBACKGROUND:challengeduevirtuesizeprovideaestheticpleasingcangetdeformedmanycongenitalanomaliesiatrogenicpost-traumaticleadingdeformityManyoptionsavailableincludingsoftmaterialalwaysdesirablereconstructpaperdescribesusetentshapedMETHODS:defect-appropriatesegmentfibulaharvestedmimicbilateralarticulatedextendsradixpartlateralcartilageinsertedpocketcreatedrecreateslopeneededmayfixedRESULTS:destructionvaultoperatedtechnique20172021averagedimensionslengthcmwidth123requiredreportedprofilesurgeryvisualanaloguescalerevealedGaussiandistributioncurverange010pvalue<005meannasofrontalnasofacialanglespostoperativelycomplicationstemporaryCONCLUSION:speciallycloselymimicshencegivessatisfactoryresultsintraoperativemanoeuvringsculpturingstabilityowingoftenobviatesneedskeletontypesuitablecasesdesiredLEVELOFEVIDENCEIII:journalrequiresauthorsassignlevelevidencearticledescriptionEvidence-BasedMedicineratingspleasereferTableContentsonlineInstructionsAuthorswwwspringercom/00266TotalAnatomicalSkeletalUsingNewAutologousGraft:TentShapedFibularContouredGraftAestheticFibulaRhinoplasty

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.