A method for phenotyping lettuce volume and structure from 3D images.

Victor Bloch, Alexey Shapiguzov, Titta Kotilainen, Matti Pastell
Author Information
  1. Victor Bloch: Production Systems Unit, Natural Resources, Institute Luke (Finland), 00790, Helsinki, Finland. victor.bloch@volcani.agri.gov.il.
  2. Alexey Shapiguzov: Production Systems Unit, Natural Resources, Institute Luke (Finland), 00790, Helsinki, Finland.
  3. Titta Kotilainen: Production Systems Unit, Natural Resources, Institute Luke (Finland), 00790, Helsinki, Finland.
  4. Matti Pastell: Production Systems Unit, Natural Resources, Institute Luke (Finland), 00790, Helsinki, Finland.

Abstract

Monitoring plant growth is crucial for effective crop management, and using color and depth (RGBD) cameras to model lettuce has emerged as one of the most convenient and non-invasive methods. In recent years, deep learning techniques, particularly neural networks, have become popular for estimating lettuce fresh weight. However, these models are typically specific to particular datasets, lack domain adaptation, and are often limited by the availability of open-access datasets. In this study, we propose a method based on plant geometric features for estimating the rosette structure and volume of lettuce. This new approach was compared to existing methods that reconstruct surfaces from point clouds, such as Ball Pivoting and Alpha Shapes. The proposed method creates a tight hull around the plant's point cloud, preserving high detail of the rosette structure while filling in surface holes in areas not visible to 3D cameras. Using a linear regression model, we estimated fresh weight for this dataset, achieving a root mean square error (RMSE) of 18.2 g when using only the estimated plant volume, and 17.3 g when both volume and geometric features were included. Additionally, we introduced new geometric features that characterize leaf density, which could be useful for breeding applications. A dataset of 402 point clouds of lettuce plants, captured before harvest, was compiled using one top-down and three side-view 3D cameras.

Keywords

References

  1. Hortic Res. 2020 Aug 1;7:124 [PMID: 32821407]
  2. Front Plant Sci. 2022 Aug 31;13:982562 [PMID: 36119576]
  3. Breed Sci. 2022 Mar;72(1):75-84 [PMID: 36045893]
  4. Front Plant Sci. 2022 Sep 29;13:947690 [PMID: 36247622]
  5. Front Plant Sci. 2022 Apr 13;13:758818 [PMID: 35498682]
  6. Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jun 25;12:611940 [PMID: 34249028]
  7. Sensors (Basel). 2021 May 24;21(11): [PMID: 34073867]
  8. Plant Methods. 2021 Sep 16;17(1):95 [PMID: 34530876]
  9. Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jul 23;22(15): [PMID: 35898004]
  10. Front Plant Sci. 2022 Aug 25;13:980581 [PMID: 36092436]
  11. Sensors (Basel). 2018 Apr 03;18(4): [PMID: 29614039]
  12. Plants (Basel). 2021 Dec 02;10(12): [PMID: 34961123]
  13. Sensors (Basel). 2023 Mar 08;23(6): [PMID: 36991638]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0lettucestructurevolume3DplantusingcamerasfreshweightmethodgeometricfeaturesrosettepointmodelonemethodsestimatingdatasetsnewcloudsestimateddatasetgLettuceMonitoringgrowthcrucialeffectivecropmanagementcolordepthRGBDemergedconvenientnon-invasiverecentyearsdeeplearningtechniquesparticularlyneuralnetworksbecomepopularHowevermodelstypicallyspecificparticularlackdomainadaptationoftenlimitedavailabilityopen-accessstudyproposebasedapproachcomparedexistingreconstructsurfacesBallPivotingAlphaShapesproposedcreatestighthullaroundplant'scloudpreservinghighdetailfillingsurfaceholesareasvisibleUsinglinearregressionachievingrootmeansquareerrorRMSE182173includedAdditionallyintroducedcharacterizeleafdensityusefulbreedingapplications402plantscapturedharvestcompiledtop-downthreeside-viewphenotypingimagesmodellingPlant

Similar Articles

Cited By