A scoping review on continuing professional development programs for midwives: optimising management of obstetric emergencies and complications.

Maurine Rofhiwa Musie, Oslinah Buru Tagutanazvo, Nombulelo Veronica Sepeng, Fhumulani Mavis Mulaudzi, Tsakane Hlongwane
Author Information
  1. Maurine Rofhiwa Musie: Department of Nursing Sciences Department, Faculty of Healthcare Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0084, South Africa. maurine.musie@up.ac.za.
  2. Oslinah Buru Tagutanazvo: Department of Midwifery Science, Hhohho Region, University of Eswatini, Kwaluseni Campus, Mbabane, Swaziland.
  3. Nombulelo Veronica Sepeng: Department of Nursing Sciences Department, Faculty of Healthcare Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0084, South Africa.
  4. Fhumulani Mavis Mulaudzi: Department of Nursing Sciences Department, Faculty of Healthcare Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0084, South Africa.
  5. Tsakane Hlongwane: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Midwives play a pivotal role in ensuring safe childbirth, particularly in the management of obstetric emergencies and complications (EmONC). Continuous Professional Development (CPD) programs are essential to keep midwives updated with the latest skills and knowledge, ensuring high-quality maternal care.
AIM: The study aimed to map and synthesize evidence on continuing professional development for midwives optimising management of obstetric emergencies and complications to reveal evidence to address the knowledge gap and implementation of policy.
METHODS: This scoping review was guided by the adapted version of Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework (2005). We searched databases from 2013 to 2023: PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EBSCOhost (CINAHL, MEDLINE and Academic search): and ProQuest central. The studies were appraised using mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) version 2018. Content analysis and synthesis of the findings were conducted using Nvivo 12.
RESULTS: Of the 752 articles identified through database searching, 31 articles met the inclusion criteria and reported according to the Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. After data extraction, content analysis yielded the following 4 major themes: Types of CPD training programs, Effectiveness of CPD on management of obstetric emergencies, Barriers/Challenges with lack of implementation of CPD programs and Suggestion for implementation of CPD programs.
CONCLUSION: The findings revealed the significance of CPD programs in equipping midwives with the necessary skills and knowledge to handle obstetric emergencies effectively. The program can be offered in various approaches including simulation-based training, technology-based simulation, online modules, workshops, and interdisciplinary/interprofessional learning sessions, have shown to be effective. Each method offers unique advantages, such as hands-on practice in simulations and flexibility in online learning with smart applications such as SAFE delivery applications.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Research Ethics reference #322/2023, date of registration: 14/02/2024.

Keywords

References

  1. Midwifery. 2020 Jun;85:102667 [PMID: 32114318]
  2. Matern Child Health J. 2018 Aug;22(8):1200-1207 [PMID: 29470814]
  3. BMC Med Educ. 2022 Oct 31;22(1):749 [PMID: 36316670]
  4. BMC Med Educ. 2014 Sep 24;14:201 [PMID: 25248410]
  5. Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Apr 01;10(4): [PMID: 35455839]
  6. Nurse Educ Pract. 2016 Mar;17:116-22 [PMID: 26750174]
  7. Adv Simul (Lond). 2021 Oct 14;6(1):36 [PMID: 34649628]
  8. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015 Jul-Aug;60(4):343-7 [PMID: 26255797]
  9. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;123(3):722-725 [PMID: 24553170]
  10. Nurse Educ Pract. 2017 May;24:118-122 [PMID: 26391995]
  11. Women Birth. 2021 Feb;34(1):e67-e75 [PMID: 32620381]
  12. Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Feb 05;9(2): [PMID: 33562857]
  13. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;123:177-179 [PMID: 32229248]
  14. Midwifery. 2023 Jul;122:103695 [PMID: 37119672]
  15. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Nov 20;14:367 [PMID: 25409895]
  16. Medicina (Kaunas). 2017;53(6):403-409 [PMID: 29482880]
  17. Afr Health Sci. 2021 May;21(Suppl):51-58 [PMID: 34447424]
  18. BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jul 6;23(1):498 [PMID: 37415150]
  19. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Sep 3;6(5):284-288 [PMID: 35517385]
  20. BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 14;24(1):534 [PMID: 38745243]
  21. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Dec 23;19(1):518 [PMID: 31870325]
  22. Int J Afr Nurs Sci. 2020;13:100258 [PMID: 33101975]
  23. J Perinatol. 2016 Jan;36(1):19-24 [PMID: 26513456]
  24. PLoS One. 2022 Jul 8;17(7):e0271282 [PMID: 35802730]
  25. Hum Resour Health. 2019 Mar 29;17(1):24 [PMID: 30925890]
  26. Health Policy Plan. 2019 May 1;34(4):257-270 [PMID: 31056670]
  27. Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69 [PMID: 20854677]
  28. Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 Jan;34:130-138 [PMID: 30529835]
  29. BMC Nurs. 2022 Jul 4;21(1):176 [PMID: 35787679]
  30. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 29;24(1):394 [PMID: 38553745]
  31. Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 May;69:103612 [PMID: 37087949]
  32. Midwifery. 2023 Aug;123:103698 [PMID: 37187099]
  33. JMIR Med Educ. 2021 Feb 5;7(1):e17277 [PMID: 33544086]
  34. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Nov;29(8):1102-18 [PMID: 26363737]
  35. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jan;99(1):34-41 [PMID: 31370099]
  36. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Jun;189:101-5 [PMID: 25909359]
  37. Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 Aug;39:55-60 [PMID: 31400642]
  38. Tunis Med. 2019 Jun;97(6):771-778 [PMID: 31872407]
  39. Reprod Health. 2019 Feb 27;16(1):24 [PMID: 30813967]
  40. BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 18;9(8):e028670 [PMID: 31427325]

Grants

  1. A1F750/Research development programme (RDP)

MeSH Term

Humans
Midwifery
Female
Pregnancy
Clinical Competence
Obstetric Labor Complications
Emergencies

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CPDemergenciesprogramsobstetricmanagementcomplicationsmidwivesknowledgeprofessionaldevelopmentimplementationscopingreviewensuringskillsevidencecontinuingoptimisingversionusinganalysisfindingsarticlestrainingonlinelearningapplicationsBACKGROUND:MidwivesplaypivotalrolesafechildbirthparticularlyEmONCContinuousProfessionalDevelopmentessentialkeepupdatedlatesthigh-qualitymaternalcareAIM:studyaimedmapsynthesizerevealaddressgappolicyMETHODS:guidedadaptedArkseyO'Malleymethodologicalframework2005searcheddatabases20132023:PubMedSCOPUSWebScienceEBSCOhostCINAHLMEDLINEAcademicsearch:ProQuestcentralstudiesappraisedmixedmethodsappraisaltoolMMAT2018ContentsynthesisconductedNvivo12RESULTS:752identifieddatabasesearching31metinclusioncriteriareportedaccordingPreferredreportingitemssystematicreviewsmeta-analysesextensionPRISMA-ScRchecklistdataextractioncontentyieldedfollowing4majorthemes:TypesEffectivenessBarriers/ChallengeslackSuggestionCONCLUSION:revealedsignificanceequippingnecessaryhandleeffectivelyprogramcanofferedvariousapproachesincludingsimulation-basedtechnology-basedsimulationmodulesworkshopsinterdisciplinary/interprofessionalsessionsshowneffectivemethodoffersuniqueadvantageshands-onpracticesimulationsflexibilitysmartSAFEdeliveryTRIALREGISTRATION:ResearchEthicsreference#322/2023dateregistration:14/02/2024midwives:ContinuingMaternalhealthcareObstetric

Similar Articles

Cited By