Consumer attitudes and perceptions on consumption of edible insects among communities in western Kenya.

Emmah Owidi, Gilbert Asoka, Eric Waga, Alfred Ochieng', Fanuel Kawaka
Author Information
  1. Emmah Owidi: Department of Environmental Education, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya.
  2. Gilbert Asoka: IPSOS Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
  3. Eric Waga: Independent Research Consultant, Nairobi, Kenya.
  4. Alfred Ochieng': Department of Biological Sciences, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology (JOOUST), Bondo, Kenya.
  5. Fanuel Kawaka: Department of Biological Sciences, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology (JOOUST), Bondo, Kenya. ORCID

Abstract

Edible insects are a highly sustainable and nutritional food source despite their low consumption in many communities. This study evaluated consumer attitudes and perceptions on consumption of edible insects in western Kenya. Eight focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted in four rural and four urban markets in Kisumu and Vihiga counties. The FGDs were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic content analysis. A total of 59 respondents consisting of 27 male and 32 females participated in the FGDs. The results showed higher acceptability and consumption of edible insects in rural areas compared to urban centers. The most popular edible insects were flying termites, grasshoppers, soldier termites and locusts. Consumption of these insects was mostly determined by their perceived high nutritional value, pleasant taste and familiarity as food sources. Seasonal capturing of the insects, especially during off-season also contributed to their low consumption. Respondents' willingness to taste insect-based products was based on curiosity, packaging and familiarity with the product forms. These results suggest that there is need for interventions that promote public awareness and enhance the availability of edible insects and insect-based products, to support wider acceptability and consumption.

References

  1. Foods. 2024 Aug 22;13(16): [PMID: 39200567]
  2. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017 Nov 22;57(17):3747-3759 [PMID: 27008043]
  3. Appetite. 2022 Jan 1;168:105790 [PMID: 34742771]
  4. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 28;10(8):e0136458 [PMID: 26317772]
  5. Front Nutr. 2021 Jun 30;8:687712 [PMID: 34277684]
  6. J Food Sci Technol. 2023 Aug;60(8):2105-2120 [PMID: 37273559]
  7. Front Nutr. 2023 Jun 14;10:1113219 [PMID: 37388630]
  8. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 15;19(18): [PMID: 36141915]
  9. Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;43(4):1097-104 [PMID: 25009309]
  10. Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 29;14(1):5045 [PMID: 38424443]
  11. Foods. 2021 Mar 26;10(4): [PMID: 33810486]
  12. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 26;19(23): [PMID: 36497830]
  13. Appetite. 2016 Dec 1;107:47-58 [PMID: 27444958]
  14. Anim Front. 2023 Aug 14;13(4):26-40 [PMID: 37583795]
  15. Afr J Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):93-99 [PMID: 30456117]
  16. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 11;19(22): [PMID: 36429542]
  17. Insects. 2021 May 19;12(5): [PMID: 34069495]
  18. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2023 Nov 22;19(1):54 [PMID: 37993955]
  19. Insects. 2020 Dec 31;12(1): [PMID: 33396313]
  20. Food Res Int. 2024 Apr;182:114174 [PMID: 38519187]
  21. Proc Nutr Soc. 2021 May;80(2):186-194 [PMID: 33494845]
  22. Curr Dev Nutr. 2024 Jul 02;8(8):104410 [PMID: 39157009]
  23. J Insect Sci. 2021 Mar 1;21(2): [PMID: 33822126]
  24. Front Nutr. 2022 Feb 21;8:759885 [PMID: 35265649]

MeSH Term

Kenya
Humans
Female
Male
Edible Insects
Consumer Behavior
Adult
Animals
Middle Aged
Young Adult
Focus Groups
Rural Population
Attitude
Adolescent
Perception
Nutritive Value

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0insectsconsumptionedibleFGDsnutritionalfoodlowcommunitiesattitudesperceptionswesternKenyafourruralurbanresultsacceptabilitytermitestastefamiliarityinsect-basedproductsEdiblehighlysustainablesourcedespitemanystudyevaluatedconsumerEightfocusgroupdiscussionsconductedmarketsKisumuVihigacountiesaudio-recordedtranscribedanalyzedusingthematiccontentanalysistotal59respondentsconsisting27male32femalesparticipatedshowedhigherareascomparedcenterspopularflyinggrasshopperssoldierlocustsConsumptionmostlydeterminedperceivedhighvaluepleasantsourcesSeasonalcapturingespeciallyoff-seasonalsocontributedRespondents'willingnessbasedcuriositypackagingproductformssuggestneedinterventionspromotepublicawarenessenhanceavailabilitysupportwiderConsumeramong

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.