Edible Insect Meals as Bioactive Ingredients in Sustainable Snack Bars.

Francesca Coppola, Silvia Jane Lombardi, Patrizio Tremonte
Author Information
  1. Francesca Coppola: Institute of Food Science, Italian National Research Council, Via Roma 64, 83100 Avellino, Italy.
  2. Silvia Jane Lombardi: Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences (DiAAA), University of Molise, Via De Sanctis snc, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
  3. Patrizio Tremonte: Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences (DiAAA), University of Molise, Via De Sanctis snc, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.

Abstract

Insect metabolites are known for their preservative potential, but the time-consuming and unsustainable extraction process compromises their transferability. This study aimed to identify user-friendly solutions based on the use of insect meals that could improve microbiological safety as well as consumer acceptability. In this regard, the antimicrobial activity of and meals against surrogate strains of Gram-positive () and Gram-negative () pathogenic bacteria and mycotoxin-producing fungi () was evaluated. Minimum inhibitory concentration values of between 3.12 mg/mL vs. and 12.50 mg/mL vs. were found. Based on this finding, a model food was developed also considering consumer acceptance. Statistical analysis of food preferences showed that nutritional and sustainability claims were the independent variables of greatest interest. Therefore, waste or by-products from other food chains were selected as co-ingredients for sustainability, nutritional, and sensory claims. Analysis of the chemical composition showed that the insect bar-style snack qualifies as a "high-protein" food, as protein provides more than 20% of the energy value. Based on the moisture (30%) and water activity (0.77) values, the bar could be classified as an intermediate-moisture food. The challenge test showed that the insect meal prevented the proliferation of intentionally added undesirable microorganisms. Conclusively, the findings complement the knowledge on the antimicrobial activities of insect meals, offering new possibilities for their use as natural preservative ingredients with nutritionally relevant properties.

Keywords

References

  1. Nat Food. 2020 Jun;1(6):343-350 [PMID: 37128090]
  2. Carbohydr Polym. 2022 Jul 1;287:119349 [PMID: 35422296]
  3. J Food Sci. 2024 Feb;89(2):793-810 [PMID: 38221802]
  4. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025 Mar;295:139668 [PMID: 39793808]
  5. J Appl Microbiol. 2007 Sep;103(3):743-51 [PMID: 17714408]
  6. Foods. 2024 Feb 06;13(4): [PMID: 38397483]
  7. Insects. 2022 Jun 14;13(6): [PMID: 35735883]
  8. Curr Res Food Sci. 2023 Dec 28;8:100672 [PMID: 38261860]
  9. Foods. 2015 Oct 12;4(4):565-580 [PMID: 28231222]
  10. Foods. 2024 Jun 12;13(12): [PMID: 38928788]
  11. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019 Mar;103(5):1989-2006 [PMID: 30637497]
  12. Heliyon. 2024 Jan 05;10(2):e24045 [PMID: 38293460]
  13. Foods. 2024 May 15;13(10): [PMID: 38790835]
  14. Food Chem. 2025 Feb 1;464(Pt 2):141726 [PMID: 39471559]
  15. Insects. 2018 Apr 19;9(2): [PMID: 29671798]
  16. Foods. 2024 Aug 24;13(17): [PMID: 39272437]
  17. J Food Sci. 2016 Jan;81(1):M97-105 [PMID: 26556435]
  18. Foods. 2024 Aug 22;13(16): [PMID: 39200567]
  19. Int J Food Microbiol. 1994 Nov;23(3-4):277-94 [PMID: 7873331]
  20. Microorganisms. 2024 Jun 10;12(6): [PMID: 38930557]
  21. Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Mar 29;25(7): [PMID: 38612644]
  22. Anim Biosci. 2022 Feb;35(2):332-346 [PMID: 34991217]
  23. Microorganisms. 2020 Jul 10;8(7): [PMID: 32664371]
  24. Molecules. 2021 Feb 04;26(4): [PMID: 33557306]
  25. Front Microbiol. 2018 Jun 26;9:1373 [PMID: 29997593]
  26. Foods. 2025 Jan 10;14(2): [PMID: 39856872]
  27. Food Chem. 2022 Nov 1;393:133409 [PMID: 35751205]
  28. Food Microbiol. 2024 Sep;122:104544 [PMID: 38839230]
  29. Nutr Rev. 2024 Jun 10;82(7):892-912 [PMID: 37634146]
  30. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2000 Sep;6(9):509-15 [PMID: 11168187]
  31. Infect Immun. 1974 Jul;10(1):136-45 [PMID: 4210336]
  32. Foods. 2024 Jul 27;13(15): [PMID: 39123571]
  33. Heliyon. 2022 Oct 19;8(10):e11168 [PMID: 36303907]
  34. Foods. 2024 Oct 25;13(21): [PMID: 39517192]
  35. Food Chem. 2017 Mar 1;218:335-340 [PMID: 27719918]
  36. Heliyon. 2025 Jan 11;11(2):e41790 [PMID: 39897848]
  37. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019 Mar 15;125:72-77 [PMID: 30500507]
  38. Pathogens. 2023 Jun 20;12(6): [PMID: 37375544]
  39. Pharmaceutics. 2020 Nov 13;12(11): [PMID: 33202757]
  40. Appetite. 2022 Feb 1;169:105832 [PMID: 34896167]
  41. Front Microbiol. 2016 Dec 20;7:1998 [PMID: 28066336]
  42. Front Microbiol. 2022 Apr 26;13:900876 [PMID: 35558107]
  43. Food Res Int. 2019 Feb;116:90-102 [PMID: 30717022]
  44. Foods. 2024 Oct 11;13(20): [PMID: 39456291]
  45. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024 Jan 23;108(1):167 [PMID: 38261012]
  46. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2022 Jan;21(1):148-197 [PMID: 34773434]
  47. Food Chem Toxicol. 2025 Mar;197:115249 [PMID: 39855617]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0foodinsectmealsantimicrobialactivityshowedInsectpreservativeuseconsumervalues12mg/mLvsBasednutritionalsustainabilityclaimsmetabolitesknownpotentialtime-consumingunsustainableextractionprocesscompromisestransferabilitystudyaimedidentifyuser-friendlysolutionsbasedimprovemicrobiologicalsafetywellacceptabilityregardsurrogatestrainsGram-positiveGram-negativepathogenicbacteriamycotoxin-producingfungievaluatedMinimuminhibitoryconcentration350foundfindingmodeldevelopedalsoconsideringacceptanceStatisticalanalysispreferencesindependentvariablesgreatestinterestThereforewasteby-productschainsselectedco-ingredientssensoryAnalysischemicalcompositionbar-stylesnackqualifies"high-protein"proteinprovides20%energyvaluemoisture30%water077barclassifiedintermediate-moisturechallengetestmealpreventedproliferationintentionallyaddedundesirablemicroorganismsConclusivelyfindingscomplementknowledgeactivitiesofferingnewpossibilitiesnaturalingredientsnutritionallyrelevantpropertiesEdibleMealsBioactiveIngredientsSustainableSnackBarsAlphitobiusdiaperinusEscherichiacoliListeriaPenicilliumexpansumTenebriomolitorbiopreservation

Similar Articles

Cited By