Genomic and Proteomic Analyses of Bacterial Communities of Ticks from Broome County, New York.

Michel Shamoon-Pour, Emily H Canessa, John Macher, Amaan Fruitwala, Emma Draper, Benjamin Policriti, Matthew Chin, Matthew Nunez, Paul Puccio, Yuan Fang, Xin-Ru Wang, Yetrib Hathout
Author Information
  1. Michel Shamoon-Pour: First-year Research Immersion, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902, USA. ORCID
  2. Emily H Canessa: Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902, USA. ORCID
  3. John Macher: Department of Anthropology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902, USA.
  4. Amaan Fruitwala: Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902, USA.
  5. Emma Draper: Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902, USA.
  6. Benjamin Policriti: Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902, USA.
  7. Matthew Chin: Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902, USA.
  8. Matthew Nunez: Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902, USA.
  9. Paul Puccio: Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902, USA.
  10. Yuan Fang: Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902, USA. ORCID
  11. Xin-Ru Wang: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.
  12. Yetrib Hathout: Tick-borne Disease Center, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902, USA.

Abstract

The microbial communities of , the primary vector of Lyme disease in North America, exhibit regional variations that may affect pathogen transmission and vector competence. We analyzed bacterial communities in ticks collected from Broome County, New York, using 16S rRNA gene sequencing (18 ticks) as well as mass spectrometry-based proteomics (36 ticks). According to the 16S rRNA analysis, the endosymbiont was the most abundant species, with significantly higher ( = 0.0011) abundance in females (54.76%) compared to males (31.15%). We detected in 44.44% of ticks and in two nymphs but in high relative abundances (12.73% and 46.46%). Male ticks exhibited higher bacterial diversity, although the community composition showed no significant clustering by sex or life stage. Co-occurrence analysis revealed negative associations between and ( = 0.0245), but no associations with . Proteomic analysis identified 12 -specific proteins, additionally detecting the protozoan pathogen in 18.18% of females. These findings provide the first comprehensive characterization of microbiomes in the Southern Tier region of New York and suggest broader distribution of across tick life stages than previously recognized, with potential implications for pathogen transmission dynamics.

Keywords

References

  1. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1156:53-66 [PMID: 24791981]
  2. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jul 21;163(2):91-8 [PMID: 26053877]
  3. Trends Biochem Sci. 2017 Dec;42(12):936-945 [PMID: 29037863]
  4. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 06;24(2): [PMID: 36674613]
  5. Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis. 2021 Jun 06;1:100036 [PMID: 35284884]
  6. Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis. 2024 Jul 03;6:100199 [PMID: 39070229]
  7. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 18;5(4): [PMID: 33218113]
  8. J Med Entomol. 2021 Jul 16;58(4):1546-1564 [PMID: 33095859]
  9. Insects. 2020 Oct 20;11(10): [PMID: 33092135]
  10. OMICS. 2018 Apr;22(4):248-254 [PMID: 29652573]
  11. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015 Feb;65(Pt 2):424-431 [PMID: 25385990]
  12. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2021 Mar 18;28(1):49-55 [PMID: 33775067]
  13. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2022 Nov;13(6):102025 [PMID: 35973261]
  14. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2023 Nov;14(6):102233 [PMID: 37494882]
  15. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2023 Sep;14(5):102202 [PMID: 37244157]
  16. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Jan;80(1):354-9 [PMID: 24162580]
  17. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):86-91 [PMID: 33316206]
  18. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Sep;68(9):4559-66 [PMID: 12200314]
  19. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015 Mar;65(Pt 3):965-970 [PMID: 25563918]
  20. Nat Methods. 2016 Jul;13(7):581-3 [PMID: 27214047]
  21. ISME J. 2017 Mar;11(3):813-816 [PMID: 27858931]
  22. Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Dec 12;11(6):e0215623 [PMID: 37800912]
  23. Mol Ecol. 2015 May;24(10):2566-79 [PMID: 25847197]
  24. Cell Host Microbe. 2014 Jan 15;15(1):58-71 [PMID: 24439898]
  25. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 09;15(3): [PMID: 29522469]
  26. Curr Opin Hematol. 2020 Nov;27(6):399-405 [PMID: 32889826]
  27. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Jun;990:131-3 [PMID: 12860614]
  28. J Med Entomol. 2008 Mar;45(2):289-97 [PMID: 18402145]
  29. BMC Microbiol. 2019 Jun 24;19(1):138 [PMID: 31234774]
  30. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Jun 27;2(6):e0000215 [PMID: 36962313]
  31. Parasitology. 2023 Sep;150(10):859-865 [PMID: 37722758]
  32. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2024 Jan;15(1):102286 [PMID: 38016209]
  33. Int J Microbiol. 2013;2013:805456 [PMID: 24282414]
  34. BMC Microbiol. 2021 Jun 11;21(1):178 [PMID: 34116633]
  35. Viruses. 2018 Jul 22;10(7): [PMID: 30037148]
  36. Materials (Basel). 2022 Aug 24;15(17): [PMID: 36079205]
  37. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 May;16(5):556-564 [PMID: 26856777]
  38. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2017 Jun;8(4):554-563 [PMID: 28359751]
  39. J Med Entomol. 2021 Nov 9;58(6):2453-2466 [PMID: 34289040]
  40. Microorganisms. 2020 Nov 20;8(11): [PMID: 33233565]
  41. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 31;114(5):E781-E790 [PMID: 28096373]
  42. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2020 Jan;11(1):101299 [PMID: 31542229]
  43. J Microbiol Methods. 2007 May;69(2):330-9 [PMID: 17391789]
  44. Genome Biol Evol. 2018 Dec 1;10(12):3218-3229 [PMID: 30398619]
  45. PLoS One. 2019 Mar 19;14(3):e0213384 [PMID: 30889229]
  46. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2023 Oct 01;49(10):446-456 [PMID: 38481649]
  47. J Clin Invest. 2010 Sep;120(9):3179-90 [PMID: 20739755]
  48. Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jan 11;12(1):e0108623 [PMID: 38038450]
  49. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Feb 06;9(2):e0003473 [PMID: 25659152]
  50. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Sep;81(18):6200-9 [PMID: 26150449]
  51. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005 Mar;11(3):476-8 [PMID: 15757571]
  52. Front Microbiol. 2012 Jun 25;3:230 [PMID: 22737150]
  53. Parasit Vectors. 2021 Jan 14;14(1):49 [PMID: 33446262]
  54. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2019 Dec 1;95(12): [PMID: 31722384]
  55. PLoS One. 2020 May 15;15(5):e0232398 [PMID: 32413031]
  56. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2022 May;414(13):3791-3802 [PMID: 35416505]
  57. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2023 Dec 14;12(12):e0084323 [PMID: 37962344]
  58. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2019 Aug;10(5):1028-1032 [PMID: 31151922]
  59. Front Vet Sci. 2022 Jan 06;8:748427 [PMID: 35071375]
  60. Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0140423 [PMID: 37184407]
  61. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2023 Jun;23(6):311-315 [PMID: 37126383]
  62. Curr Biol. 2018 Jun 18;28(12):1896-1902.e5 [PMID: 29861133]
  63. Nat Methods. 2010 May;7(5):335-6 [PMID: 20383131]
  64. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Jul 24;8(7):e2984 [PMID: 25058611]
  65. Pathogens. 2022 Jan 21;11(2): [PMID: 35215074]
  66. Mol Ecol. 2023 Jul;32(14):4078-4092 [PMID: 37173817]
  67. Microorganisms. 2023 Dec 27;12(1): [PMID: 38257877]
  68. J Med Entomol. 2024 Jan 12;61(1):257-260 [PMID: 37738127]
  69. Pathogens. 2023 Nov 20;12(11): [PMID: 38003835]
  70. Front Microbiol. 2022 Mar 17;13:854803 [PMID: 35369485]
  71. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017 Jun 08;7:236 [PMID: 28642842]
  72. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2022 Sep;36(3):671-688 [PMID: 36116842]
  73. ISME J. 2018 Nov;12(11):2596-2607 [PMID: 29946195]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0tickspathogenNewYorkanalysiscommunitiesvectorLymediseasetransmissionbacterialBroomeCounty16SrRNA18proteomicsendosymbionthigher=0females12lifeassociationsProteomicmicrobialprimaryNorthAmericaexhibitregionalvariationsmayaffectcompetenceanalyzedcollectedusinggenesequencingwellmassspectrometry-based36Accordingabundantspeciessignificantly0011abundance5476%comparedmales3115%detected4444%twonymphshighrelativeabundances73%4646%MaleexhibiteddiversityalthoughcommunitycompositionshowedsignificantclusteringsexstageCo-occurrencerevealednegative0245identified-specificproteinsadditionallydetectingprotozoan18%findingsprovidefirstcomprehensivecharacterizationmicrobiomesSouthernTierregionsuggestbroaderdistributionacrosstickstagespreviouslyrecognizedpotentialimplicationsdynamicsGenomicAnalysesBacterialCommunitiesTicksBorreliellaburgdorferiIxodesscapularisRickettsiabuchnerimicrobiometick-bornediseases

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.