Phages as potential life-saving therapeutic option in the treatment of multidrug-resistant urinary tract infections.

Beata Zalewska-Pi��tek, Michalina Nag��rka
Author Information
  1. Beata Zalewska-Pi��tek: Department of Biotechnology and Microbiology, Chemical Faculty, Gda��sk University of Technology, Gda��sk, Poland.
  2. Michalina Nag��rka: Department of Biotechnology and Microbiology, Chemical Faculty, Gda��sk University of Technology, Gda��sk, Poland.

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common bacterial infections worldwide and increasing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) challenges conventional antibiotic treatments. Phage therapy (PT) has emerged as a promising alternative due to its specificity, safety and efficacy against multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens causing infectious diseases. PT demonstrates significant potential in treating chronic and recurrent UTIs, also including catheter-associated infection by reducing bacterial biofilms, delaying catheter blockage, and enhancing antibiotic efficacy when used in combination. Clinical trials and case studies have reported high rates of bacterial eradication and symptom improvement with minimal side effects. Although endotoxin release and immune activation during treatment should continue to be investigated. The aim of this review is to present issues related to the use of phages in the treatment of UTIs of various etiological origins in selected patients, including those with comorbidities, taking into account the legal regulations, safety and effectiveness of this experimental therapy. The growing prevalence of MDR uropathogens highlights the urgent need for alternative therapies, such as those based on phages in order to treat antibiotic-resistant infections and improve patient outcomes. Despite the great potential of PT, its clinical implementation and use of phages as a routine treatment for bacterial infections requires rigorous trials, standardized production protocols and regulatory advancements.

Keywords

References

  1. Molecules. 2023 Feb 13;28(4): [PMID: 36838752]
  2. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020 Aug 14;10:414 [PMID: 32923408]
  3. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Aug 6;8(3):162-173 [PMID: 28828194]
  4. Viruses. 2021 Jun 29;13(7): [PMID: 34209836]
  5. Clin Ther. 2020 Sep;42(9):1659-1680 [PMID: 32883528]
  6. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2021 Apr 26;20(1):30 [PMID: 33902597]
  7. Transpl Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;23(1):e13391 [PMID: 32599666]
  8. Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Jun 05;9(6): [PMID: 32517088]
  9. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Nov 22;16(12): [PMID: 38139765]
  10. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2020 Apr;65(2):217-231 [PMID: 31494814]
  11. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2013 Apr;15(2):109-15 [PMID: 23378123]
  12. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Jun 1;73(6):1460-1463 [PMID: 29481657]
  13. J Wound Care. 2009 Jun;18(6):237-8, 240-3 [PMID: 19661847]
  14. Phage (New Rochelle). 2023 Sep 1;4(3):112-127 [PMID: 37771568]
  15. JAMA. 2020 Feb 18;323(7):658-659 [PMID: 31995139]
  16. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015 May;13(5):269-84 [PMID: 25853778]
  17. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Sep 24;16(10): [PMID: 37895818]
  18. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017 Nov;50(5):678-683 [PMID: 28803933]
  19. Virus Genes. 2020 Apr;56(2):136-149 [PMID: 32036540]
  20. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Oct 12;12:996778 [PMID: 36310856]
  21. Lancet. 2022 Feb 12;399(10325):629-655 [PMID: 35065702]
  22. Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 14;7(1):8004 [PMID: 28808331]
  23. Front Microbiol. 2022 May 10;13:796132 [PMID: 35620093]
  24. Virus Res. 2017 Aug 15;240:8-17 [PMID: 28746884]
  25. Viruses. 2021 Oct 12;13(10): [PMID: 34696479]
  26. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2014 Mar;28(1):1-13 [PMID: 24484571]
  27. Front Microbiol. 2018 Aug 07;9:1832 [PMID: 30131795]
  28. Eur Urol. 2024 Jul;86(1):27-41 [PMID: 38714379]
  29. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Sep;26(9):1229-1235 [PMID: 32387436]
  30. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Feb 19;10(2): [PMID: 33669513]
  31. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 23;5(4):ofy064 [PMID: 29687015]
  32. Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Sep;10(5):722-725 [PMID: 39048403]
  33. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;21(3):427-436 [PMID: 32949500]
  34. Infect Drug Resist. 2020 Jan 07;13:45-61 [PMID: 32021319]
  35. Res Rep Urol. 2022 Apr 04;14:109-133 [PMID: 35402319]
  36. Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jun 10;12:692614 [PMID: 34177601]
  37. Microb Biotechnol. 2023 Jul;16(7):1456-1474 [PMID: 37178319]
  38. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2022 Dec;12(12):4348-4364 [PMID: 36561998]
  39. Front Pharmacol. 2019 May 08;10:513 [PMID: 31139086]
  40. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Sep;35 Suppl 2:S32-47 [PMID: 25376068]
  41. Res Microbiol. 2007 Sep;158(7):553-4 [PMID: 17855060]
  42. Adv Virus Res. 2012;83:3-40 [PMID: 22748807]
  43. J Mol Genet Med. 2012;6:279-86 [PMID: 22872803]
  44. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(8):780-90 [PMID: 11545337]
  45. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 4;378(1):48-59 [PMID: 29298155]
  46. Radiology. 2024 Dec;313(3):e241668 [PMID: 39656125]
  47. Virus Evol. 2024 Apr 03;10(1):veae028 [PMID: 38756985]
  48. Arch Razi Inst. 2021 Nov 30;76(5):1229-1236 [PMID: 35355758]
  49. Urologiia. 2024 Mar;(1):114-118 [PMID: 38655779]
  50. Cell. 2023 Jan 5;186(1):17-31 [PMID: 36608652]
  51. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Oct 1;73(10):2901-2903 [PMID: 30060002]
  52. Pol J Microbiol. 2019 Dec;68(4):403-415 [PMID: 31880885]
  53. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 15;366(11):1028-37 [PMID: 22417256]
  54. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008 Jan;21(1):26-59 [PMID: 18202436]
  55. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Aug;22(8):e208-e220 [PMID: 35248167]
  56. Nature. 2015 Jan 22;517(7535):455-9 [PMID: 25561178]
  57. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 15;70(9):1998-2001 [PMID: 31414123]
  58. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023 Jun;29(6):702-709 [PMID: 36736661]
  59. J Hyg (Lond). 1936 Jun;36(2):204-35 [PMID: 20475326]
  60. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2014 Mar;28(1):105-19 [PMID: 24484578]
  61. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Mar;45(3):649-59 [PMID: 11181338]
  62. Biosens Bioelectron. 2016 Jul 15;81:166-172 [PMID: 26945183]
  63. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Mar;30(3):395-401 [PMID: 20882676]

MeSH Term

Humans
Urinary Tract Infections
Phage Therapy
Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Bacteriophages
Catheter-Related Infections
Biofilms
Bacterial Infections

Chemicals

Anti-Bacterial Agents

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0infectionsbacterialtreatmentphagestractUTIstherapyPTmultidrug-resistantpotentialantimicrobialresistanceantibioticalternativesafetyefficacyMDRincludingtrialsuseuropathogensurinaryUrinaryamongcommonworldwideincreasingAMRchallengesconventionaltreatmentsPhageemergedpromisingduespecificitypathogenscausinginfectiousdiseasesdemonstratessignificanttreatingchronicrecurrentalsocatheter-associatedinfectionreducingbiofilmsdelayingcatheterblockageenhancingusedcombinationClinicalcasestudiesreportedhighrateseradicationsymptomimprovementminimalsideeffectsAlthoughendotoxinreleaseimmuneactivationcontinueinvestigatedaimreviewpresentissuesrelatedvariousetiologicaloriginsselectedpatientscomorbiditiestakingaccountlegalregulationseffectivenessexperimentalgrowingprevalencehighlightsurgentneedtherapiesbasedordertreatantibiotic-resistantimprovepatientoutcomesDespitegreatclinicalimplementationroutinerequiresrigorousstandardizedproductionprotocolsregulatoryadvancementsPhageslife-savingtherapeuticoptionphage

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.