Feasibility and Safety of Virtual Reality-Based Online Group Discussions Among Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Hiroki Funao, Motomu Shimaoka, Jun Kako
Author Information
  1. Hiroki Funao: Department of Nursing, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, JPN.
  2. Motomu Shimaoka: Department of Molecular Pathobiology and Cell Adhesion Biology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, JPN.
  3. Jun Kako: Department of Nursing, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, JPN.

Abstract

Objective Virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a potential tool for enhancing learning experiences in various fields, including nursing education. However, its feasibility, safety, and impact on online group discussions remain underexplored. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of VR conferencing in basic education courses for nursing students. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted with third-year nursing students at Mie University, Tsu, Japan. Participants were assigned non-randomly to either a VR discussion group using MetaQuest 3 and Horizon Workrooms or a video discussion group using Zoom meetings. The groups discussed challenges in the daily lives of patients with chronic shoulder pain and completed tasks, such as listing and ranking challenges. After the discussions, data on discussion drop rates, levels of understanding, teamwork, psychological safety, cybersickness, cognitive load, and impressions of VR and avatar usage were collected. All variables are summarized by the group as means and standard deviations, medians and interquartile ranges, or frequencies and percentages, as appropriate. Results A total of 36 nursing students participated in this study (VR group: n=17; video group: n=19). All Participants completed the discussions without dropping out or experiencing cybersickness. The average discussion time was comparable between the groups (approximately 10 minutes). Both groups demonstrated an equivalent understanding of the topic. Both discussion methods had positive effects on teamwork and psychological safety. Cognitive load differences were mixed, with VR reducing some elements of task-related stress (e.g., understanding the overall discussion) but showing higher demands in others (e.g., the design for learning tasks). Participants in the VR group reported a high intention to continue using VR and noted that avatar customization (e.g., clothing and hairstyles) influenced the discussions. Conclusions Both VR and video groups engaged in discussions of similar quality and completed the discussion. As none of the Participants had cybersickness or dropped out of the discussions, it was thought that the VR discussions were feasible. Carefully selecting discussion themes, evaluation items, and avatar conditions, as well as verifying the effectiveness of online discussion methods, are necessary.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 08;12:693543 [PMID: 34690859]
  2. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Sep 15;15(9):1616-1625 [PMID: 37746642]
  3. Mater Sociomed. 2014 Feb;26(1):65-7 [PMID: 24757408]
  4. GMS J Med Educ. 2023 Apr 17;40(2):Doc19 [PMID: 37361246]
  5. Nurse Educ Today. 2024 Jul;138:106189 [PMID: 38603830]
  6. J Pain Res. 2019 Aug 21;12:2563-2576 [PMID: 31686898]
  7. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2020 Dec;23(12):846-853 [PMID: 32856952]
  8. Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 04;12:705448 [PMID: 34671291]
  9. Lancet. 2007 Oct 20;370(9596):1453-7 [PMID: 18064739]
  10. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 12;19(4): [PMID: 35206250]
  11. Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 15;12:705574 [PMID: 34721153]
  12. Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 16;8:1997 [PMID: 29201011]
  13. Appl Ergon. 2001 Feb;32(1):1-14 [PMID: 11209825]
  14. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023 Jun 22;304:62-66 [PMID: 37347570]
  15. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Mar 31;14:96 [PMID: 32300295]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0VRdiscussiondiscussionsgroupnursingsafetyvideogroupsavatareducationstudyconferencingstudentsusingcompletedunderstandingteamworkpsychologicalcybersicknessloadegVirtualrealitylearningfeasibilityonlineParticipantschallengestaskscognitivegroup:participantsmethodsvrObjectiveemergedpotentialtoolenhancingexperiencesvariousfieldsincludingHoweverimpactremainunderexploredaimedassessbasiccoursesMethodscross-sectionalconductedthird-yearMieUniversityTsuJapanassignednon-randomlyeitherMetaQuest3HorizonWorkroomsZoommeetingsdiscusseddailylivespatientschronicshoulderpainlistingrankingdatadroprateslevelsimpressionsusagecollectedvariablessummarizedmeansstandarddeviationsmediansinterquartilerangesfrequenciespercentagesappropriateResultstotal36participatedn=17n=19withoutdroppingexperiencingaveragetimecomparableapproximately10minutesdemonstratedequivalenttopicpositiveeffectsCognitivedifferencesmixedreducingelementstask-relatedstressoverallshowinghigherdemandsothersdesignreportedhighintentioncontinuenotedcustomizationclothinghairstylesinfluencedConclusionsengagedsimilarqualitynonedroppedthoughtfeasibleCarefullyselectingthemesevaluationitemsconditionswellverifyingeffectivenessnecessaryFeasibilitySafetyReality-BasedOnlineGroupDiscussionsAmongNursingStudents:Cross-SectionalStudyvirtual

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.