Development of the Leisure Activity Scale for young adults: Reliability and validity.

Rumiko Kinkawa, Miki Ono, Satoshi Horiuchi, Masayuki Kikkawa, Shunichiro Ito, Akifumi Shimasaki, Yu Tamada, Jiro Masuya, Mina Honyashiki, Takeshi Inoue
Author Information
  1. Rumiko Kinkawa: Department of Psychiatry Tokyo Medical University Tokyo Japan.
  2. Miki Ono: Department of Psychiatry Tokyo Medical University Tokyo Japan. ORCID
  3. Satoshi Horiuchi: Department of Social and Clinical Psychology Hijiyama University Hiroshima Japan.
  4. Masayuki Kikkawa: Department of Psychiatry Tokyo Medical University Tokyo Japan.
  5. Shunichiro Ito: Department of Psychiatry Tokyo Medical University Tokyo Japan.
  6. Akifumi Shimasaki: Department of Psychiatry Tokyo Medical University Tokyo Japan.
  7. Yu Tamada: Department of Psychiatry Tokyo Medical University Tokyo Japan.
  8. Jiro Masuya: Department of Psychiatry Tokyo Medical University Tokyo Japan.
  9. Mina Honyashiki: Department of Psychiatry Tokyo Medical University Tokyo Japan.
  10. Takeshi Inoue: Department of Psychiatry Tokyo Medical University Tokyo Japan. ORCID

Abstract

Aim: Previous studies have documented the beneficial effects of leisure activities on mental health. However, limited methods or scales are available to measure leisure activities for the evaluation of mental health or the intervention of mental disorders, and data on the therapeutic benefits of leisure activities for mental health are scarce. Furthermore, few studies have investigated the effects of leisure activities on the mental health of young individuals. Therefore, we developed the Leisure Activity Scale (LAS; a 7-item, 5-point scale) to assess the leisure activities of young adults, and aimed to confirm its reliability and validity.
Methods: This study involved 551 Japanese participants aged 18-25 years and was conducted through an online survey from September to November 2022. Reliability of the LAS was assessed through internal consistency analysis. To determine convergent and discriminant validity, the LAS was compared with various scales measuring psychometric properties, including depression, anxiety, work fatigue recovery, resilience, neuroticism, emotion regulation, well-being, and ill-being.
Results: Factor analysis indicated that the 7-item LAS was the most appropriate measure for use in mental health (Cronbach's �� coefficient���=���0.756). Total LAS7 scores positively correlated with recovery experience, resilience, emotion regulation, and well-being, and negatively correlated with state anxiety. These were all weak correlations, with correlation coefficients of less than 0.3. Total LAS7 scores did not correlate with trait anxiety, neuroticism, or ill-being.
Conclusions: Our results demonstrated the reliability of the LAS, but its convergent validity was insufficient. The LAS can comprehensively assess leisure activities, although further improvement regarding its validity is needed.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychol Assess. 2010 Mar;22(1):108-20 [PMID: 20230157]
  2. J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Mar;47(3):391-400 [PMID: 23260171]
  3. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2019 May - Jun;58:45-50 [PMID: 30884441]
  4. JAMA. 1999 Nov 10;282(18):1737-44 [PMID: 10568646]
  5. J Clin Psychol. 2016 Jan;72(1):70-8 [PMID: 26443982]
  6. J Trauma Stress. 2007 Dec;20(6):1019-28 [PMID: 18157881]
  7. J Occup Health Psychol. 2007 Jul;12(3):204-21 [PMID: 17638488]
  8. Front Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 07;13:1052275 [PMID: 36569620]
  9. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;62(6):593-602 [PMID: 15939837]
  10. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2023 Feb;15(1):133-151 [PMID: 35971651]
  11. J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 04;9(9): [PMID: 32899622]
  12. World Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;19(3):360-380 [PMID: 32931092]
  13. Rev Bras Enferm. 2015 May-Jun;68(3):444-9, 504-9 [PMID: 26312523]
  14. Behav Modif. 2011 Mar;35(2):111-61 [PMID: 21324944]
  15. J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Jun;101:50-56 [PMID: 29550608]
  16. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Dec 1;71(12):1400-8 [PMID: 25354080]
  17. BMJ. 2009 Aug 11;339:b2880 [PMID: 19671933]
  18. Psychol Health Med. 2019 Jul;24(6):654-666 [PMID: 30540200]
  19. Lancet Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;1(7):569-76 [PMID: 26361316]
  20. Psychol Rep. 2007 Dec;101(3 Pt 1):952-60 [PMID: 18232454]
  21. Neurology. 2006 Mar 28;66(6):821-7 [PMID: 16467493]
  22. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;85(2):348-62 [PMID: 12916575]
  23. Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76-82 [PMID: 12964174]
  24. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2019;66(10):617-628 [PMID: 31708562]
  25. Psychosom Med. 2009 Sep;71(7):725-32 [PMID: 19592515]
  26. J Occup Health. 2012;54(3):196-205 [PMID: 22790522]
  27. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2018 Jun 13;4:2333721418781677 [PMID: 29977981]
  28. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2021 Mar 31;7(1):e12134 [PMID: 33816759]
  29. Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Nov;197(5):357-64 [PMID: 21037212]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0leisureactivitiesmentalLAShealthvalidityanxietyyoungrecoveryresiliencestudieseffectsscalesmeasureLeisureActivityScale7-itemassessreliabilityReliabilityanalysisconvergentneuroticismemotionregulationwell-beingill-beingTotalLAS7scorescorrelatedexperienceAim:PreviousdocumentedbeneficialHoweverlimitedmethodsavailableevaluationinterventiondisordersdatatherapeuticbenefitsscarceFurthermoreinvestigatedindividualsThereforedeveloped5-pointscaleadultsaimedconfirmMethods:studyinvolved551Japaneseparticipantsaged18-25yearsconductedonlinesurveySeptemberNovember2022assessedinternalconsistencydeterminediscriminantcomparedvariousmeasuringpsychometricpropertiesincludingdepressionworkfatigueResults:FactorindicatedappropriateuseCronbach's��coefficient���=���0756positivelynegativelystateweakcorrelationscorrelationcoefficientsless03correlatetraitConclusions:resultsdemonstratedinsufficientcancomprehensivelyalthoughimprovementregardingneededDevelopmentadults:activitywell���being

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.