The effect of chronic kidney disease on adverse in-hospital outcomes after radical cystectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion.

Michele Nicolazzini, Natali Rodriguez Pe��aranda, Fabian Falkenbach, Mattia Longoni, Andrea Marmiroli, Quynh Chi Le, Calogero Catanzaro, Zhe Tian, Jordan A Goyal, Salvatore Micali, Markus Graefen, Alberto Briganti, Gennaro Musi, Felix K H Chun, Riccardo Schiavina, Fred Saad, Shahrokh F Shariat, Carlotta Palumbo, Alessandro Volpe, Pierre I Karakiewicz
Author Information
  1. Michele Nicolazzini: Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montr��al Health Center, Montr��al, Qu��bec, Canada. michelenicolazzini@yahoo.it.
  2. Natali Rodriguez Pe��aranda: Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montr��al Health Center, Montr��al, Qu��bec, Canada.
  3. Fabian Falkenbach: Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montr��al Health Center, Montr��al, Qu��bec, Canada.
  4. Mattia Longoni: Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montr��al Health Center, Montr��al, Qu��bec, Canada.
  5. Andrea Marmiroli: Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montr��al Health Center, Montr��al, Qu��bec, Canada.
  6. Quynh Chi Le: Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montr��al Health Center, Montr��al, Qu��bec, Canada.
  7. Calogero Catanzaro: Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montr��al Health Center, Montr��al, Qu��bec, Canada.
  8. Zhe Tian: Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montr��al Health Center, Montr��al, Qu��bec, Canada.
  9. Jordan A Goyal: Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montr��al Health Center, Montr��al, Qu��bec, Canada.
  10. Salvatore Micali: Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
  11. Markus Graefen: Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  12. Alberto Briganti: 6. Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
  13. Gennaro Musi: Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  14. Felix K H Chun: Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  15. Riccardo Schiavina: Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
  16. Fred Saad: Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montr��al Health Center, Montr��al, Qu��bec, Canada.
  17. Shahrokh F Shariat: Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  18. Carlotta Palumbo: Division of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carit�� Hospital, Novara, Italy.
  19. Alessandro Volpe: Division of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carit�� Hospital, Novara, Italy.
  20. Pierre I Karakiewicz: Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montr��al Health Center, Montr��al, Qu��bec, Canada.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is frequent in bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) with ileal conduit. However, the effect of CKD on adverse in-hospital outcomes after ileal conduit RC is not well known.
METHODS: Descriptive analyses, propensity score matching (PSM), and multivariable logistic and Poisson regression models were used to address National Inpatient Sample patients treated with ileal conduit RC between 2006 and 2019. CKD severity was stratified as mild (stage II) vs. moderate (stage III) vs. severe (stage IV/V).
RESULTS: Of 13,359 patients treated with RC with ileal conduit, 1973 (14.8%) had CKD. Of those, 956 (48.5%), 802 (40.6%), and 215 (10.9%) were classified as mild, moderate, or severe CKD, respectively. CKD rate increased from 4.1 to 21.9% (2006-2019, EAPC: +8.9%, p���<���0.001). CKD RC patients exhibited higher rates of adverse in-hospital outcomes in 11 of 15 categories. The absolute differences were largest for overall complications (+���13.2%), prolonged length of stay (+���7.0%), blood transfusions (+���6.0%, all p���<���0.001). After detailed multivariable adjustment, CKD was an independent predictor of 11 of 15 adverse in-hospital outcomes' categories. The detrimental effect of CKD was most pronounced for dialysis (OR 7.09), overall complications (OR 1.84), and neurological complications (OR 1.61, all p���<���0.001). Finally, a dose-response effect according to CKD severity on adverse in-hospital outcomes was observed in eight of 15 categories.
CONCLUSIONS: CKD RC patients invariably exhibited higher rates of adverse in-hospital outcomes after RC with ileal conduit. In consequence this patient group should receive particularly strong consideration for preoperative optimization.

Keywords

References

  1. Cao J, Zhao X, Zhong Z et al (2016) Prognostic value of pre-operative renal insufficiency in Urothelial Carcinoma: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Sci Rep 6:35214. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35214 [DOI: 10.1038/srep35214]
  2. Schmid M, Ravi P, Abd-El-Barr AERM et al (2014) Chronic kidney disease and perioperative outcomes in urological oncological surgery. Int J Urol 21:1245���1252. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.12563 [DOI: 10.1111/iju.12563]
  3. Siech C, Baudo A, de Angelis M et al (2024) Perioperative complications and in-hospital mortality in radical cystectomy patients with heart-valve replacement. Eur J Surg Oncol 50:108297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108297 [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108297]
  4. Falkenbach F, Di Bello F, Rodriguez Pe��aranda N et al (2024) Adverse In-Hospital outcomes after radical prostatectomy in Leukemia History patients. Cancers (Basel) 16:2764. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16152764 [DOI: 10.3390/cancers16152764]
  5. Di Bello F, Siech C, de Angelis M et al (2024) Perioperative complications and In-Hospital mortality in Paraplegic Radical Cystectomy patients. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16332-3 . Ann Surg Oncol
  6. Kim H, Jeong BC, Lee S et al (2022) Predicting factor analysis of postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: Multicenter KORARC database study. Int J Urol 29:939���946. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14815 [DOI: 10.1111/iju.14815]
  7. Nguyen C, Ghodoussipour S, Winter M et al (2022) Chronic kidney disease and radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and oncologic outcomes in 1,214 patients. Urologic Oncology: Seminars Original Investigations 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.04.010 .:381.e9-381.e16
  8. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville MD, HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). 2008���2019. Accessed: Sep. 02, 2023. [Online]. Available: www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp
  9. Hanna N, Sun M, Trinh Q-D et al (2012) Propensity-score-matched comparison of Perioperative outcomes between Open and Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy: a National Series. Eur Urol 61:715���721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.026 [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.026]
  10. Nazzani S, Mazzone E, Preisser F et al (2018) Comparison of Perioperative outcomes between Open and Robotic Radical Cystectomy: a Population-based analysis. J Endourol 32:701���709. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0313 [DOI: 10.1089/end.2018.0313]
  11. Lyon TD, Faraj KS, Brennan E et al (2022) Defining radical cystectomy using the ICD-10 procedure coding system. Urologic Oncology: Seminars Original Investigations 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.09.013 .:165.e17-165.e22
  12. Siech C, Jannello LMI, de Angelis M et al (2024) Critical care therapy use after radical cystectomy in patients with non-metastatic bladder cancer. Curr Probl Surg 61:101526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpsurg.2024.101526 [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2024.101526]
  13. Mazzone E, Preisser F, Nazzani S et al (2019) The effect of age and comorbidities on early postoperative complications after radical cystectomy: a contemporary population-based analysis. J Geriatr Oncol 10:623���631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2019.04.011 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.04.011]
  14. Palumbo C, Knipper S, Pecoraro A et al (2020) Patient frailty predicts worse perioperative outcomes and higher cost after radical cystectomy. Surg Oncol 32:8���13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2019.10.014 [DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.10.014]
  15. Lee RK, Abol-Enein H, Artibani W et al (2014) Urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: options, patient selection, and outcomes. BJU Int 113:11���23. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12121 [DOI: 10.1111/bju.12121]
  16. Loh KP, Abdallah M, Shieh M-S et al (2018) Use of Inpatient Palliative Care services in patients with Advanced Cancer receiving critical care therapies. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 16:1055���1064. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2018.7039 [DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7039]
  17. Mazzone E, Mistretta FA, Knipper S et al (2020) Temporal trends and social barriers for inpatient palliative care delivery in metastatic prostate cancer patients receiving critical care therapies. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 23:260���268. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-019-0183-9 [DOI: 10.1038/s41391-019-0183-9]
  18. CPI Home: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024) CPI Home. Bureau of Labor Statistics n.d. https://www.bls.gov/cpi/
  19. Deyo R, Cherkin D, Ciol M (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45:613���619. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8 [DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8]
  20. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P et al (2005) Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 43:1130���1139. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83 [DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83]
  21. Official JOurnal Of the internatiOnal SOciety Of nephrOlOgy KDIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease
  22. Desai RJ, Franklin JM (2019) Alternative approaches for confounding adjustment in observational studies using weighting based on the propensity score: a primer for practitioners. BMJ 367. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l5657
  23. Schulz KF, Grimes DA (2002) Case-control studies: research in reverse. Lancet 359:431���434 [DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07605-5]
  24. Sountoulides P, Pyrgidis N, Brookman-May S et al (2021) Does Ureteral stenting increase the risk of Metachronous Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma in patients with bladder tumors? A systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Urol 205:956���965 [DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001548]
  25. Bahrainwala JZ, Gelfand SL, Shah A et al (2020) Preoperative risk Assessment and management in adults receiving maintenance Dialysis and those with earlier stages of CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 75:245���255. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.07.008 [DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.07.008]
  26. Grams ME, Waikar SS, MacMahon B et al (2014) Performance and Limitations of Administrative Data in the identification of AKI. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 9:682���689. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.07650713 [DOI: 10.2215/CJN.07650713]
  27. Pellegrino F, Leni R, Basile G et al (2024) Peri- and post-operative outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy after the implementation of the EAU guidelines recommendations for collecting and reporting complications at a high-volume referral center. World J Urol 42:270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-04970-x [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04970-x]
  28. Longoni M, Scilipoti P, Re C et al (2024) Use of 18F-fluoro���2���deoxy��� ���d ���glucose���<���scp>(18F���FDG) PET / ���CT���for lymph node assessment before radical cystectomy in bladder cancer patients. BJU Int 134:636���643. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16363 [DOI: 10.1111/bju.16363]
  29. Bacchiani M, Salamone V, Massaro E et al (2023) Assessing the performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in bladder Cancer: a narrative review of current evidence. Cancers (Basel) 15:2951. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15112951 [DOI: 10.3390/cancers15112951]

MeSH Term

Humans
Cystectomy
Urinary Diversion
Male
Female
Aged
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
Retrospective Studies

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CKDRCilealconduitadversein-hospitalpatientsoutcomeseffectcystectomystage9%1p���<���000115categoriescomplicationsORkidneydiseasebladderradicalmultivariabletreatedseveritymildvsmoderatesevereexhibitedhigherrates11overall0%chronicPURPOSE:ChronicfrequentcancerundergoingHoweverwellknownMETHODS:DescriptiveanalysespropensityscorematchingPSMlogisticPoissonregressionmodelsusedaddressNationalInpatientSample20062019stratifiedIIIIIIV/VRESULTS:133591973148%956485%802406%21510classifiedrespectivelyrateincreased4212006-2019EAPC:+8absolutedifferenceslargest+���132%prolongedlengthstay+���7bloodtransfusions+���6detailedadjustmentindependentpredictoroutcomes'detrimentalpronounceddialysis70984neurological61Finallydose-responseaccordingobservedeightCONCLUSIONS:invariablyconsequencepatientgroupreceiveparticularlystrongconsiderationpreoperativeoptimizationurinarydiversionComplicationsNISRadicalRenalinsufficiencyUrinaryneoplasms

Similar Articles

Cited By