Exploring the role of self-led debriefings within simulation-based education: time to challenge the status quo?

Prashant Kumar, Neil Malcolm Harrison, Katy McAleer, Ibraaheem Khan, Susan Geraldine Somerville
Author Information
  1. Prashant Kumar: Department of Medical Education, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Scotland, UK. prashant.kumar916@gmail.com.
  2. Neil Malcolm Harrison: Centre for Medical Education & Dundee Institute for Healthcare Simulation, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK.
  3. Katy McAleer: Department of Anaesthesia, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Scotland, UK.
  4. Ibraaheem Khan: Department of Anaesthesia, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Scotland, UK.
  5. Susan Geraldine Somerville: Centre for Medical Education & Dundee Institute for Healthcare Simulation, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The notion that debriefing quality is highly reliant on the skills and expertise of the facilitator is being increasingly challenged. There is therefore emerging interest in self-led debriefings (SLDs), whereby following a simulated learning event, individuals or groups of learners conduct a debriefing amongst themselves, without the immediate presence of a trained facilitator. The interest in this approach to debriefing is multifactorial but is, in part, driven by a desire to reduce costs associated with resource-intensive faculty presence. The debate regarding the role of SLDs in simulation-based education (SBE) therefore has important implications for the simulation community.
MAIN BODY: We comprehensively explore the role of SLDs by contextualising their application across the spectrum of SBE, both in terms of contrasting simulation factors, namely (i) simulation modality, (ii) debriefing forum, and (iii) debriefing adjuncts, as well as different learner characteristics, namely (i) learners' previous simulation experience, (ii) learner numbers, and (iii) learners' professional and cultural backgrounds. These factors inherently shape the conduct and format of SLDs, and thus impact their effectiveness in influencing learning. We have synthesised and critically analysed the available literature to illuminate this discussion.
CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence suggests that SLDs can, in the right circumstances, form part of an effective debriefing strategy and support learners to reach appropriate levels of critical self-reflection and learning. Careful consideration and due diligence must go into the design and implementation of SLDs to augment the advantages of this debriefing format, such as enhancing flexibility and learner autonomy, whilst mitigating potential risks, such as reinforcing errors and biases or causing psychological harm. In situations where resources for facilitator-led debriefings (FLDs) are limited, simulation educators should recognise SLDs as a potential avenue to explore in their local contexts. By leveraging the strengths of both formats, balancing learner autonomy and expert guidance, a combined SLD and FLD approach may yet prove to be the optimal debriefing strategy to maximise learning. Whilst more research is needed to deepen our understanding of the nuances of SLDs to assess their true applicability across the spectrum of SBE, the time may now have arrived to consider challenging the status quo.

Keywords

References

  1. Med Educ. 2014 Jul;48(7):657-66 [PMID: 24909527]
  2. Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Jan;84:104249 [PMID: 31683133]
  3. Crit Care Med. 2011 Jun;39(6):1574-5 [PMID: 21610631]
  4. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Mar 2;6(2):81-86 [PMID: 35516080]
  5. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Nov - Dec;24(7):1184-1189 [PMID: 28757439]
  6. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Feb;97:104675 [PMID: 33302184]
  7. Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):504-516 [PMID: 29792464]
  8. PEC Innov. 2023 Nov 20;3:100233 [PMID: 38033419]
  9. Crit Care Med. 2011 Jun;39(6):1377-81 [PMID: 21317645]
  10. Simul Healthc. 2017 Oct;12(5):319-325 [PMID: 28538446]
  11. Simul Healthc. 2021 Dec 1;16(6):407-413 [PMID: 34009910]
  12. Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3787-3795 [PMID: 32804266]
  13. Surgery. 2021 Dec;170(6):1659-1664 [PMID: 34330538]
  14. Simul Healthc. 2024 Jan 1;19(1S):S90-S97 [PMID: 37651101]
  15. Simul Healthc. 2024 Jan 1;19(1S):S112-S121 [PMID: 38240623]
  16. Simul Healthc. 2022 Oct 1;17(5):283-292 [PMID: 34839303]
  17. Nurse Educ Today. 2020 May 07;91:104468 [PMID: 32454316]
  18. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2016 May;75(5):127-32 [PMID: 27239391]
  19. AEM Educ Train. 2019 Aug 12;4(1):36-42 [PMID: 31989069]
  20. Simul Healthc. 2020 Feb;15(1):55-60 [PMID: 31743312]
  21. Korean J Med Educ. 2012 Dec;24(4):319-27 [PMID: 25813328]
  22. Simul Healthc. 2022 Feb 1;17(1):e20-e27 [PMID: 34009907]
  23. Hum Factors. 2013 Feb;55(1):231-45 [PMID: 23516804]
  24. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 Mar;29(1):9-25 [PMID: 37245197]
  25. BMC Med Educ. 2005 Jul 19;5:28 [PMID: 16029509]
  26. J Interprof Care. 2014 Mar;28(2):110-5 [PMID: 24372044]
  27. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Dec;107:105113 [PMID: 34492539]
  28. Acad Med. 2015 Nov;90(11):1501-8 [PMID: 26375272]
  29. Simul Healthc. 2014 Dec;9(6):339-49 [PMID: 25188485]
  30. Nurse Educ Pract. 2020 Jan 13;43:102698 [PMID: 32004851]
  31. Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 Jun 18;7(1):18 [PMID: 35717254]
  32. Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 Oct 12;9(1):43 [PMID: 39394595]
  33. J Surg Educ. 2018 Nov;75(6):1463-1470 [PMID: 29748142]
  34. Simul Healthc. 2007 Summer;2(2):115-25 [PMID: 19088616]
  35. J Nurs Educ. 2016 Sep 1;55(9):522-7 [PMID: 27560120]
  36. Nurse Educ. 2019 May/Jun;44(3):E1-E6 [PMID: 30015683]
  37. Acad Med. 2014 Jan;89(1):136-43 [PMID: 24280843]
  38. BMC Med Educ. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):314 [PMID: 31438936]
  39. Simul Healthc. 2021 Dec 1;16(6):e168-e175 [PMID: 33370083]
  40. Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Jun;65:67-73 [PMID: 29533836]
  41. Simul Healthc. 2016 Jun;11(3):209-17 [PMID: 27254527]
  42. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015 May;43(3):300-8 [PMID: 25943601]
  43. Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 Jan 16;9(1):5 [PMID: 38229166]
  44. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Oct;105:105018 [PMID: 34175564]
  45. Simul Healthc. 2016 Feb;11(1):32-40 [PMID: 26836466]
  46. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Jul;102:104907 [PMID: 33901867]
  47. Ann Surg. 2013 Jul;258(1):53-8 [PMID: 23728281]
  48. Nurse Educ Today. 2020 May 11;91:104470 [PMID: 32454315]
  49. J Interprof Care. 2016 Nov;30(6):717-725 [PMID: 27309589]
  50. Nurse Educ Pract. 2015 Nov;15(6):543-8 [PMID: 26299701]
  51. J Interprof Care. 2023 Mar-Apr;37(2):187-202 [PMID: 35403551]
  52. Am J Surg. 2015 Jan;209(1):126-31 [PMID: 25497438]
  53. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2022 Jul 01;34(7):901-908 [PMID: 35452028]
  54. Nurs Health Sci. 2020 Jun;22(2):243-253 [PMID: 31793162]
  55. Simul Healthc. 2024 Oct 22;: [PMID: 39432489]
  56. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2024 Apr;77(2):265-272 [PMID: 38556779]
  57. Nurse Educ. 2019 Nov/Dec;44(6):E6-E8 [PMID: 30585886]
  58. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Mar;34(3):372-6 [PMID: 23890542]
  59. Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Dec;71:34-39 [PMID: 30218850]
  60. Simul Healthc. 2024 Apr 1;19(2):90-104 [PMID: 37335122]
  61. Simul Healthc. 2024 Jan 1;19(1S):S75-S89 [PMID: 38240621]
  62. BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Mar;32(3):160-172 [PMID: 35902231]
  63. Anat Sci Educ. 2017 Nov;10(6):549-559 [PMID: 28419750]
  64. Nurse Educ. 2021 Jan/Feb;46(1):E7-E11 [PMID: 32433378]
  65. Simul Healthc. 2015 Aug;10(4):202-9 [PMID: 26154249]
  66. Nurs Health Sci. 2016 Jun;18(2):238-45 [PMID: 26833934]
  67. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Jun;34(6):978-84 [PMID: 24467864]
  68. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Jun;34(6):e58-63 [PMID: 24169444]
  69. AEM Educ Train. 2021 Aug 01;5(4):e10702 [PMID: 34901686]
  70. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2018 Aug 13;5(2):61-72 [PMID: 35519834]
  71. Simul Healthc. 2013 Jun;8(3):166-70 [PMID: 23702587]
  72. Future Healthc J. 2019 Oct;6(3):181-185 [PMID: 31660522]
  73. J Dent Educ. 2019 May;83(5):536-545 [PMID: 30804169]
  74. J Surg Educ. 2019 Mar - Apr;76(2):362-369 [PMID: 30292454]
  75. Anesth Analg. 2009 Jul;109(1):183-9 [PMID: 19535709]
  76. Simul Healthc. 2018 Aug;13(4):239-246 [PMID: 29672469]
  77. Adv Simul (Lond). 2023 Dec 14;8(1):30 [PMID: 38098131]
  78. Simul Healthc. 2024 Feb 1;19(1):1-10 [PMID: 36598821]
  79. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2014 May;19(2):251-72 [PMID: 23712700]
  80. J Nurs Educ. 2021 Feb 1;60(2):90-95 [PMID: 33528579]
  81. Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Apr;87:104345 [PMID: 32135455]
  82. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016 Dec 26;13:44 [PMID: 28028288]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0debriefingSLDssimulationlearninglearnerdebriefingsroleSBEfacilitatorthereforeinterestself-ledlearnersconductpresenceapproachpartsimulation-basededucationexploreacrossspectrumfactorsnamelyiiiiilearners'formatstrategyautonomypotentialmaytimestatusBACKGROUND:notionqualityhighlyreliantskillsexpertiseincreasinglychallengedemergingwherebyfollowingsimulatedeventindividualsgroupsamongstwithoutimmediatetrainedmultifactorialdrivendesirereducecostsassociatedresource-intensivefacultydebateregardingimportantimplicationscommunityMAINBODY:comprehensivelycontextualisingapplicationtermscontrastingmodalityforumadjunctswelldifferentcharacteristicspreviousexperiencenumbersprofessionalculturalbackgroundsinherentlyshapethusimpacteffectivenessinfluencingsynthesisedcriticallyanalysedavailableliteratureilluminatediscussionCONCLUSIONS:currentevidencesuggestscanrightcircumstancesformeffectivesupportreachappropriatelevelscriticalself-reflectionCarefulconsiderationduediligencemustgodesignimplementationaugmentadvantagesenhancingflexibilitywhilstmitigatingrisksreinforcingerrorsbiasescausingpsychologicalharmsituationsresourcesfacilitator-ledFLDslimitededucatorsrecogniseavenuelocalcontextsleveragingstrengthsformatsbalancingexpertguidancecombinedSLDFLDyetproveoptimalmaximiseWhilstresearchneededdeepenunderstandingnuancesassesstrueapplicabilitynowarrivedconsiderchallengingquoExploringwithineducation:challengequo?DebriefingPeer-debriefingPeer-ledSelf-debriefingSelf-guidedSelf-ledSimulation-basedUnfacilitated

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.