Kinetic Study of Release of Neem from Chitosan Biopolymer and Assessment of Its Biological Effectiveness.

Yasodani Nishshanka, Charitha Thambiliyagodage, Madara Jayanetti
Author Information
  1. Yasodani Nishshanka: Faculty of Humanities and Sciences, Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology, New Kandy Road, Malabe, Colombo 10115, Sri Lanka.
  2. Charitha Thambiliyagodage: Faculty of Humanities and Sciences, Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology, New Kandy Road, Malabe, Colombo 10115, Sri Lanka. ORCID
  3. Madara Jayanetti: Faculty of Humanities and Sciences, Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology, New Kandy Road, Malabe, Colombo 10115, Sri Lanka.

Abstract

The study examined the sustained release of neem from the polymeric carrier system chitosan by varying the drug content, ionic strength of the release medium, and pH. Six different kinetic models, i.e., Korsmeyer-Peppas (KP), Peppas-Sahlin (PS), Higuchi, Hixson-Crowell, Zero order, and First order were used to investigate the drug release kinetics. Based on the R values, the KP and PS models were chosen from the examined models to study the drug release mechanism from the chitosan biopolymer. The values found for model parameters and in the KP and PS models differ noticeably, suggesting that Fickian diffusion and Case II relaxation are important components of the neem release mechanism from chitosan. At lower ionic strengths and lower pH values, neem is released from the composite mostly by Fickian diffusion. The diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl assay served to assess the composite's antioxidant properties. The composite's antioxidant properties ranged from 3.56 �� 1.89% at 10 ��g/mL to 51.28 �� 1.14% at 70 ��g/mL. The ability of the composite to inhibit the denaturation of egg albumin was also tested and it ranged from 59.68 �� 0.93% at 25 ��g/mL to 187.63 �� 3.53% at 1600 ��g/mL. The drug composite has exhibited antibacterial activity against , , , and , and proved to be highly effective against at lower concentrations and against at higher concentrations. The resulting inhibition zones for at 5 and 10 mg/mL concentrations were 16.5 �� 2.25 mm, and 14.83 �� 0.6 mm, respectively, whereas for it was 16.67 �� 0.33 mm at 20 mg/mL. The neem-chitosan composite's minimum inhibitory concentration/minimum bactericidal concentration ratio for , , and was greater than 4, suggesting that they trigger bacteriostatic outcomes, whereas for it was 4, which means that bactericidal effects were evident.

Keywords

References

  1. Heliyon. 2021 Dec 24;8(1):e08674 [PMID: 35028457]
  2. Cureus. 2023 Sep 26;15(9):e46003 [PMID: 37900405]
  3. Pharm Biol. 2015 May;53(5):642-52 [PMID: 25489634]
  4. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014 Jul;4(4):532-6 [PMID: 25221699]
  5. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jul 12;22(14): [PMID: 34299068]
  6. J Food Drug Anal. 2015 Dec;23(4):619-629 [PMID: 28911477]
  7. Molecules. 2023 Apr 01;28(7): [PMID: 37049917]
  8. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2021 Jul 2;21(1):186 [PMID: 34215240]
  9. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018 Jan;106:579-586 [PMID: 28807690]
  10. Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 14;14(1):1293 [PMID: 38221550]
  11. Cureus. 2024 Sep 24;16(9):e70103 [PMID: 39449928]
  12. Phytother Res. 2018 Jul;32(7):1241-1272 [PMID: 29671907]
  13. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2016;2016:7382506 [PMID: 27034694]
  14. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2019 Jan;263:131-194 [PMID: 30530176]
  15. Front Plant Sci. 2012 Sep 28;3:222 [PMID: 23060891]
  16. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019 Apr 1;126:1234-1243 [PMID: 30584938]
  17. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018 Sep 15;122:214-229 [PMID: 29966737]
  18. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020 Jul 15;155:1236-1244 [PMID: 31730964]
  19. Pharmacogn Mag. 2016 Oct-Dec;12(48):313-318 [PMID: 27867275]
  20. Neurochem Int. 2021 Jun;146:105023 [PMID: 33753160]
  21. Cancer Lett. 2013 Jun 28;334(1):133-41 [PMID: 23435377]
  22. RSC Adv. 2022 Oct 12;12(45):29197-29213 [PMID: 36320733]
  23. Materials (Basel). 2023 Mar 03;16(5): [PMID: 36903188]
  24. Genes Nutr. 2011 May;6(2):149-60 [PMID: 21484152]
  25. Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 24;13(1):10274 [PMID: 37355723]
  26. AAPS J. 2015 Nov;17(6):1327-40 [PMID: 26276218]
  27. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024 Mar 14;24(1):122 [PMID: 38486187]
  28. Drug Deliv. 2005 Jan-Feb;12(1):41-57 [PMID: 15801720]
  29. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018 Mar 1;114:199-209 [PMID: 29269322]
  30. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2022 May 4;22(1):122 [PMID: 35509076]
  31. ACS Omega. 2022 Jul 15;7(29):25403-25421 [PMID: 35910103]
  32. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016 Dec;104(12):2992-3003 [PMID: 27449255]
  33. Curr Med Chem Anticancer Agents. 2005 Mar;5(2):149-6 [PMID: 15777222]
  34. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021 Oct 15;16:6983-7022 [PMID: 34703224]
  35. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021 Feb 1;169:85-94 [PMID: 33279563]
  36. Plants (Basel). 2021 Jun 18;10(6): [PMID: 34207139]
  37. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019 Oct 15;139:867-878 [PMID: 31376446]
  38. Polymers (Basel). 2021 Sep 24;13(19): [PMID: 34641071]
  39. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020 Jan 27;2020:4501261 [PMID: 32047524]
  40. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2022 Jun 30;12(13): [PMID: 35808096]
  41. Biomacromolecules. 2016 Apr 11;17(4):1253-60 [PMID: 26908114]
  42. Front Pharmacol. 2022 May 30;13:891535 [PMID: 35712721]

Grants

  1. PVC (R and I) 10/Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0��releasedrugchitosanmodels��g/mLneemKPPSvalueslowercompositecomposite'santioxidant0concentrationsmmstudyexaminedsustainedionicpHordermechanismsuggestingFickiandiffusionpropertiesranged311025antibacterial5mg/mL16whereasbactericidal4polymericcarriersystemvaryingcontentstrengthmediumSixdifferentkineticieKorsmeyer-PeppasPeppas-SahlinHiguchiHixson-CrowellZeroFirstusedinvestigatekineticsBasedRchosenbiopolymerfoundmodelparametersdiffernoticeablyCaseIIrelaxationimportantcomponentsstrengthsreleasedmostlydiphenyl-2-picrylhydrazylassayservedassess5689%512814%70abilityinhibitdenaturationeggalbuminalsotested596893%1876353%1600exhibitedactivityprovedhighlyeffectivehigherresultinginhibitionzones214836respectively673320neem-chitosanminimuminhibitoryconcentration/minimumconcentrationratiogreatertriggerbacteriostaticoutcomesmeanseffectsevidentKineticStudyReleaseNeemChitosanBiopolymerAssessmentBiologicalEffectivenessAzadirachtaindicaanti-inflammatory

Similar Articles

Cited By