Decision making in surgery: honoring patient autonomy despite high mortality risk in a 36-year-old woman with endocarditis.

Renata Sonnenfeld, Gianmarco Balestra, Sandra Eckstein
Author Information
  1. Renata Sonnenfeld: Department of Palliative Care, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
  2. Gianmarco Balestra: Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
  3. Sandra Eckstein: Department of Palliative Care, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.

Abstract

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a common complication in patients who inject drugs. We present the case of a 36-year-old woman with IE affecting both the aortic and tricuspid valves, along with a cardiac implantable electronic device infection, 11 weeks after combined aortic valve replacement, tricuspid valve replacement, and pacemaker implantation. The patient declined the medically indicated cardiac surgery due to her recent taxing surgical and rehabilitation experiences. Clear preoperative communication was crucial to align the patient's goals with available treatment options. Decision making was achieved through multiple interdisciplinary discussions, fostering openness, and dialog. This case highlights the challenges of surgical decision making and provides a valuable example of a patient-centered approach to informed consent within a multidisciplinary team. Moreover, it demonstrates the successful integration of palliative care into surgical management.

Keywords

References

  1. Eur Heart J. 2023 Dec 1;44(45):4780 [PMID: 37738322]
  2. Palliat Med. 1998 Jan;12(1):41-9 [PMID: 9616458]
  3. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Mar 1;79(8):772-785 [PMID: 35210032]
  4. Ann Palliat Med. 2022 Nov;11(11):3530-3541 [PMID: 36366901]
  5. Ann Surg. 2018 Jan;267(1):66-72 [PMID: 28471764]
  6. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Oct;44(4):508-19 [PMID: 22765967]
  7. JAMA Surg. 2016 Feb;151(2):172-83 [PMID: 26606747]
  8. Ann Thorac Surg. 2024 Jun;117(6):1087-1094 [PMID: 38242340]
  9. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2020 Sep;34(3):479-493 [PMID: 32782097]
  10. Am Surg. 2023 May;89(5):1352-1354 [PMID: 36797660]
  11. Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):31-40 [PMID: 30508432]
  12. J Surg Case Rep. 2020 Aug 24;2020(8):rjaa079 [PMID: 32855784]
  13. Circulation. 2022 Oct 4;146(14):e187-e201 [PMID: 36043414]
  14. Eur Heart J. 2015 Nov 21;36(44):3075-3128 [PMID: 26320109]
  15. J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Oct;197(4):661-86 [PMID: 14562800]
  16. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2314660 [PMID: 37256623]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0makingsurgicalendocarditisdecisionpalliativecareIEcase36-year-oldwomanaortictricuspidcardiacvalvereplacementpatientsurgerycommunicationDecisionInfectivecommoncomplicationpatientsinjectdrugspresentaffectingvalvesalongimplantableelectronicdeviceinfection11 weekscombinedpacemakerimplantationdeclinedmedicallyindicatedduerecenttaxingrehabilitationexperiencesClearpreoperativecrucialalignpatient'sgoalsavailabletreatmentoptionsachievedmultipleinterdisciplinarydiscussionsfosteringopennessdialoghighlightschallengesprovidesvaluableexamplepatient-centeredapproachinformedconsentwithinmultidisciplinaryteamMoreoverdemonstratessuccessfulintegrationmanagementsurgery:honoringautonomydespitehighmortalityriskstrategiesend-of-lifeinfectiveinformed-consenteducation

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.