Efficacy and safety of cone-beam computed tomography-guided bronchoscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ziling Li, Shuyun Xu, Yong Zhang, Jing Shi
Author Information
  1. Ziling Li: Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. ORCID
  2. Shuyun Xu: Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. ORCID
  3. Yong Zhang: Department of Pediatrics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. ORCID
  4. Jing Shi: Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. ORCID

Abstract

Background: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided bronchoscopy is increasingly utilized for diagnosing peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). We carried out the meta-analysis for assessing the efficacy and safety of CBCT-guided bronchoscopy for PPLs.
Methods: An extensive search in several databases was conducted to identify relevant articles. We evaluated the quality of studies with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. The pooled diagnostic yield (DY) and adverse event rate with the 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed. Subgroup analyses were performed according to additional use of navigation, use of radial endobronchial ultrasound (rEBUS), use of fixed or mobile CBCT, whether computed tomography (CT) spin was performed before biopsy to affirm tool-in-lesion, use of rapid onsite cytologic examination (ROSE), strictness of the definition of DY, and study design. Further analysis was performed to explore the association between odds of diagnosis with CBCT guided bronchoscopy and PPLs characteristics (>20 ≤20 mm, non-upper lobe upper lobe, with bronchus sign without bronchus sign, and solid non-solid) as well as sampling methods (forceps fine needle aspiration, forceps cryoprobe sampling). The pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI were calculated. The significance level was set at 0.05. All analyses were performed by using meta package in R version 4.3.2.
Results: We included 23 studies involving 1,769 patients and 1,863 PPLs in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled DY of CBCT-guided bronchoscopy was 80.2% (95% CI: 76.0-84.1%). Subgroup analysis showed that the DY was highest when CBCT was used with robotic-assisted navigation bronchoscopy (pooled DY 87.5%; 95% CI: 81.5-92.4%), the DY was 78.9% (95% CI: 70.8-85.9%) when CBCT was used alone without other navigation techniques. Lesion size >20 mm, presence of bronchus sign and solid lesions were associated with significant increase in the odds of diagnosis with CBCT-guided bronchoscopy. Pooled adverse event rate was 2.3% (95% CI: 1.2-3.6%).
Conclusions: CBCT-guided bronchoscopy is a safe technique with high DY in diagnosing PPLs.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Mar 15;209(6):634-646 [PMID: 38394646]
  2. Respirology. 2017 Apr;22(3):443-453 [PMID: 28177181]
  3. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2024 Apr 01;31(2):105-116 [PMID: 37459049]
  4. Chest. 2023 Jun;163(6):1589-1598 [PMID: 36640994]
  5. J Thorac Dis. 2021 Jul;13(7):4396-4406 [PMID: 34422366]
  6. Chest. 2022 May;161(5):1426-1428 [PMID: 34506792]
  7. Respiration. 2021;100(6):538-546 [PMID: 33845482]
  8. Respiration. 2023;102(12):1007-1015 [PMID: 38035570]
  9. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2018 Oct;25(4):274-282 [PMID: 30179922]
  10. Respirology. 2021 May;26(5):477-484 [PMID: 33615626]
  11. J Thorac Dis. 2018 Oct;10(10):5953-5959 [PMID: 30505506]
  12. Respir Res. 2024 Feb 5;25(1):65 [PMID: 38317222]
  13. Respiration. 2021;100(1):44-51 [PMID: 33401270]
  14. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):529-36 [PMID: 22007046]
  15. J Thorac Dis. 2018 Dec;10(12):6950-6959 [PMID: 30746241]
  16. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2024 Apr 01;31(2):117-125 [PMID: 37450607]
  17. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249 [PMID: 33538338]
  18. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2022 Apr 23;6(3):177-185 [PMID: 35509435]
  19. J Thorac Dis. 2020 Jun;12(6):3272-3278 [PMID: 32642250]
  20. Respiration. 2019;98(4):321-328 [PMID: 31121593]
  21. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Aug;104(2):443-449 [PMID: 28527967]
  22. JAMA. 2022 Jan 18;327(3):264-273 [PMID: 35040882]
  23. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2021 Apr 1;28(2):107-115 [PMID: 32732491]
  24. J Thorac Dis. 2020 Dec;12(12):7416-7428 [PMID: 33447430]
  25. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022 May;20(5):497-530 [PMID: 35545176]
  26. Ann Transl Med. 2023 Aug 30;11(10):361 [PMID: 37675336]
  27. J Thorac Dis. 2023 Feb 28;15(2):579-588 [PMID: 36910050]
  28. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Feb 12;14(4): [PMID: 38396438]
  29. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 21;13(5): [PMID: 36899971]
  30. Eur Respir Rev. 2024 Sep 18;33(173): [PMID: 39293856]
  31. Lung. 2021 Apr;199(2):177-186 [PMID: 33547938]
  32. Lung Cancer. 2023 Jun;180:107196 [PMID: 37130440]
  33. BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Mar 20;24(1):146 [PMID: 38509516]
  34. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2024 Apr 01;31(2):175-182 [PMID: 37759354]
  35. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Dec 25;12(1): [PMID: 35054208]
  36. BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60 [PMID: 12958120]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0bronchoscopyDYCBCTPPLs95%computedCBCT-guidedpooledperformeduseCI:tomographyperipheralpulmonarylesionsmeta-analysisnavigationoddsbronchussign1Cone-beamdiagnosingsafetystudiesdiagnosticyieldadverseeventrateCISubgroupanalysesanalysisdiagnosis>20mmlobewithoutsolidsamplingforceps2used9%Background:-guidedincreasinglyutilizedcarriedassessingefficacyMethods:extensivesearchseveraldatabasesconductedidentifyrelevantarticlesevaluatedqualityQualityAssessmentDiagnosticAccuracyStudiesQUADAS-2toolconfidenceintervalaccordingadditionalradialendobronchialultrasoundrEBUSfixedmobilewhetherCTspinbiopsyaffirmtool-in-lesionrapidonsitecytologicexaminationROSEstrictnessdefinitionstudydesignexploreassociationguidedcharacteristics≤20non-upperuppernon-solidwellmethodsfineneedleaspirationcryoproberatioORcalculatedsignificancelevelset005usingmetapackageRversion43Results:included23involving769patients863overall802%760-841%showedhighestrobotic-assisted875%815-924%78708-85alonetechniquesLesionsizepresenceassociatedsignificantincreasePooled3%2-36%Conclusions:safetechniquehighEfficacycone-beamtomography-guidedlesions:systematicreview

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.