Cold hearts and dark minds: a systematic review and meta-analysis of empathy across dark triad personalities.

Meenakshi Shukla, Niti Upadhyay
Author Information
  1. Meenakshi Shukla: Department of Psychology, University of Allahabad, Prayagraj, India.
  2. Niti Upadhyay: Department of Psychology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.

Abstract

Introduction: This systematic review and meta-analysis explored cognitive and affective empathy differences across Dark Triad traits-Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy.
Methods: Registered on PROSPERO and following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, ProQuest, and Google Scholar were searched for studies published until June 2024. Risk of bias was evaluated using Egger's test and Rank correlation test, along with risk-of-bias plots (Robvis) for quality assessment.
Results: Fourteen studies (N = 5,328) met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed Narcissism was negatively associated with affective empathy (r= -.134, p<.05) but not significantly linked to cognitive empathy (r= .061, p= .215), while Machiavellianism had a significant negative correlation with both cognitive (r= -.089, p<.05) and affective empathy (r= -.291, p<.0001). Psychopathy demonstrated the strongest negative association with affective empathy (r= -.347, p<.0001). Moderate-to-high heterogeneity was found across all analyses (I range: 40.56% - 94.03%).
Discussion: This review underscores differential empathy profiles across Dark Triad traits, with significant affective empathy deficits in Psychopathy and Machiavellianism and the complex role of cognitive empathy in Narcissism and Machiavellianism. Further research should examine situational and subtype -specific factors influencing empathy in Dark Triad traits to enhance theoretical understanding and inform interventions.
Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024559533, identifier CRD42024559533.

Keywords

References

  1. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(5):523-6 [PMID: 12559146]
  2. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009 May;50(5):599-606 [PMID: 19445007]
  3. Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Dec 24;10(1): [PMID: 35052193]
  4. Psychol Assess. 2019 Aug;31(8):1062-1072 [PMID: 31120296]
  5. PLoS One. 2014 May 08;9(5):e96555 [PMID: 24810604]
  6. J Pers Assess. 1984 Jun;48(3):301-5 [PMID: 16367529]
  7. J Pers Assess. 2011 Jan;93(1):84-95 [PMID: 21184334]
  8. Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 24;12:781346 [PMID: 34899531]
  9. Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 29;14:1082965 [PMID: 37457066]
  10. Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 13;9:2212 [PMID: 30483202]
  11. J Pers. 1972 Dec;40(4):525-43 [PMID: 4642390]
  12. J Soc Psychol. 2019;159(3):225-243 [PMID: 29781776]
  13. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2003 Mar;32(1):139-52 [PMID: 12573939]
  14. Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58 [PMID: 12111919]
  15. Psychol Med. 2004 Aug;34(6):1093-102 [PMID: 15554579]
  16. Scand J Psychol. 2010 Apr 1;51(2):132-8 [PMID: 19614906]
  17. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Jul;57(1):55-66 [PMID: 2754604]
  18. Assessment. 2016 Apr;23(2):135-49 [PMID: 25612628]
  19. Psychol Rep. 2023 May 1;:332941231169665 [PMID: 37127436]
  20. J Autism Dev Disord. 2004 Apr;34(2):163-75 [PMID: 15162935]
  21. Psychol Bull. 2016 Jun;142(6):573-600 [PMID: 26854867]
  22. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(23):e15987 [PMID: 31169736]
  23. Brain. 2009 Mar;132(Pt 3):617-27 [PMID: 18971202]
  24. Psychol Assess. 2010 Jun;22(2):420-32 [PMID: 20528068]
  25. Front Psychol. 2013 Jul 22;4:454 [PMID: 23885245]
  26. J Pers Assess. 2023 Mar-Apr;105(2):143-148 [PMID: 35377780]
  27. Res Synth Methods. 2021 Jan;12(1):55-61 [PMID: 32336025]
  28. Front Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 12;10:95 [PMID: 30930800]
  29. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 May 08;7:160 [PMID: 23658538]
  30. Psychol Sci. 2000 Jan;11(1):86-9 [PMID: 11228851]
  31. Psychol Med. 2004 Jul;34(5):911-9 [PMID: 15500311]
  32. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 May;54(5):890-902 [PMID: 3379585]
  33. BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34 [PMID: 9310563]
  34. Assessment. 2014 Feb;21(1):28-41 [PMID: 24322012]
  35. J Adolesc. 2006 Aug;29(4):589-611 [PMID: 16198409]
  36. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Jan;52(1):11-7 [PMID: 3820065]
  37. Cortex. 2010 May;46(5):668-77 [PMID: 19501818]
  38. J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Jan;24(1):235-45 [PMID: 21878057]
  39. J Pers Assess. 2009 Jan;91(1):62-71 [PMID: 19085285]
  40. Psych J. 2020 Feb;9(1):34-43 [PMID: 31394592]
  41. Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 30;14:1074558 [PMID: 37065887]
  42. J Soc Psychol. 2022 Jan 2;162(1):143-160 [PMID: 35083952]
  43. Brain Sci. 2023 Oct 23;13(10): [PMID: 37891865]
  44. Stat Med. 1997 Apr 15;16(7):753-68 [PMID: 9131763]
  45. Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2011 Jan;16(1):50-70 [PMID: 20737328]
  46. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Jan;68(1):151-8 [PMID: 7861311]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0empathyaffectivereviewcognitiveMachiavellianismr=-acrossDarkp<systematicmeta-analysisTriadPsychopathystudiestestcorrelationNarcissism05significantnegative0001traitsdarktriadIntroduction:exploreddifferencestraits-NarcissismMethods:RegisteredPROSPEROfollowingPRISMAguidelinesPubMedScopusScienceDirectProQuestGoogleScholarsearchedpublishedJune2024RiskbiasevaluatedusingEgger'sRankalongrisk-of-biasplotsRobvisqualityassessmentResults:FourteenN=5328metinclusioncriteriaMeta-analysisshowednegativelyassociated134significantlylinked061p=215089291demonstratedstrongestassociation347Moderate-to-highheterogeneityfoundanalysesrange:4056%9403%Discussion:underscoresdifferentialprofilesdeficitscomplexroleresearchexaminesituationalsubtype-specificfactorsinfluencingenhancetheoreticalunderstandinginforminterventionsSystematicregistration:https://wwwcrdyorkacuk/prospero/display_recordphp?ID=CRD42024559533identifierCRD42024559533Coldheartsminds:personalitiesnarcissismpsychopathy

Similar Articles

Cited By