Global review of consumer preferences and willingness to pay for edible insects and derived products.

Zewdu Abro, Kibrom T Sibhatu, Gebeyehu Manie Fetene, Mohammed Hussen Alemu, Chrysantus M Tanga, Subramanian Sevgan, Menale Kassie
Author Information
  1. Zewdu Abro: International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
  2. Kibrom T Sibhatu: International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
  3. Gebeyehu Manie Fetene: Department of Economics & Institute of Development and Policy Research (IDPR), Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  4. Mohammed Hussen Alemu: Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
  5. Chrysantus M Tanga: International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
  6. Subramanian Sevgan: International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
  7. Menale Kassie: International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.

Abstract

The rising global demand for protein, driven by population growth, urbanization, economic development, and climate change, underscores the need for sustainable alternative protein sources. Edible insects have emerged as a viable solution to enhance foodfeed and nutritional security while contributing to waste management. This study reviews 128 peer-reviewed publications to assess consumer preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for edible insects and their derivatives. Findings reveal that studies predominantly focus on Europe and insect-based foods, with limited research on insect-based feeds and derived products. Consumers in Africa, Asia, and Latin America show higher acceptance of insect-based food compared to those in Western nations, where psychological barriers such as neophobia, disgust, and limited awareness hinder adoption. WTP for insect-based foods varies, with some consumers willing to pay a premium while others expect lower prices than conventional options. Integrating edible insects into sustainable food and feed ssytems requires public education, innovative marketing, and scaling up production.

Keywords

References

  1. Annu Rev Entomol. 2013;58:563-83 [PMID: 23020616]
  2. PLoS One. 2020 Mar 25;15(3):e0230552 [PMID: 32210461]
  3. J Econ Entomol. 2018 Aug 3;111(4):1966-1973 [PMID: 29757415]
  4. Open Med. 2009;3(3):e123-30 [PMID: 21603045]
  5. Sci Rep. 2022 May 3;12(1):7182 [PMID: 35505193]
  6. Appetite. 2021 Apr 1;159:105058 [PMID: 33276014]
  7. Foods. 2021 Feb 14;10(2): [PMID: 33672950]
  8. Appetite. 2016 Nov 1;106:30-6 [PMID: 26855371]
  9. Front Nutr. 2022 Feb 21;8:759885 [PMID: 35265649]
  10. Appetite. 2016 Dec 1;107:47-58 [PMID: 27444958]
  11. Curr Dev Nutr. 2024 Feb 01;8(Suppl 1):102035 [PMID: 38476721]
  12. PLoS One. 2010 Dec 29;5(12):e14445 [PMID: 21206900]
  13. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Nov;81(5):1071 [PMID: 31279032]
  14. Foods. 2020 Jun 18;9(6): [PMID: 32570724]
  15. Anim Front. 2023 Aug 14;13(4):26-40 [PMID: 37583795]
  16. Curr Dev Nutr. 2023 Oct 11;8(Suppl 1):102014 [PMID: 38476724]
  17. Foods. 2023 May 26;12(11): [PMID: 37297407]
  18. PLoS One. 2020 Apr 30;15(4):e0224059 [PMID: 32352963]
  19. Global Health. 2022 Mar 12;18(1):31 [PMID: 35279165]
  20. Front Insect Sci. 2022 Nov 10;2:968042 [PMID: 38646070]
  21. Waste Manag. 2022 Mar 1;140:1-13 [PMID: 35030456]
  22. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2019 Nov;112(6):518-528 [PMID: 31741488]
  23. J Food Sci. 2020 Jun;85(6):1621-1628 [PMID: 32460354]
  24. Curr Dev Nutr. 2023 Sep 01;8(Suppl 1):101996 [PMID: 38476723]
  25. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143 [PMID: 30453902]
  26. Insect Sci. 2020 Jun;27(3):500-509 [PMID: 30801963]
  27. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2021 Dec;48:64-71 [PMID: 34649017]
  28. Food Chem. 2016 Feb 15;193:39-46 [PMID: 26433285]
  29. Eur J Nutr. 2024 Aug;63(5):1425-1433 [PMID: 38430450]
  30. Animals (Basel). 2019 May 24;9(5): [PMID: 31137732]
  31. Science. 2018 Jul 20;361(6399): [PMID: 30026199]
  32. Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 29;14(1):5045 [PMID: 38424443]
  33. Curr Dev Nutr. 2023 Sep 01;8(Suppl 1):101994 [PMID: 38476727]
  34. Food Res Int. 2025 Jan;200:115355 [PMID: 39779158]
  35. Annu Rev Nutr. 2021 Oct 11;41:551-576 [PMID: 34186013]
  36. Science. 2018 Jun 1;360(6392):987-992 [PMID: 29853680]
  37. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2013 May;57(5):802-23 [PMID: 23471778]
  38. Waste Manag. 2020 Dec;118:600-609 [PMID: 33010691]
  39. Nutrients. 2020 Sep 11;12(9): [PMID: 32933038]
  40. J Environ Manage. 2020 Apr 15;260:110066 [PMID: 31941627]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0insectsinsect-basedproteinpayediblefoodsustainablesourcesconsumerpreferenceswillingnessWTPfoodslimitedderivedproductsfeedInsect-basedrisingglobaldemanddrivenpopulationgrowthurbanizationeconomicdevelopmentclimatechangeunderscoresneedalternativeEdibleemergedviablesolutionenhancefoodfeednutritionalsecuritycontributingwastemanagementstudyreviews128peer-reviewedpublicationsassessderivativesFindingsrevealstudiespredominantlyfocusEuroperesearchfeedsConsumersAfricaAsiaLatinAmericashowhigheracceptancecomparedWesternnationspsychologicalbarriersneophobiadisgustawarenesshinderadoptionvariesconsumerswillingpremiumothersexpectlowerpricesconventionaloptionsIntegratingssytemsrequirespubliceducationinnovativemarketingscalingproductionGlobalreviewAlternativeCirculareconomyEntomophagySustainability

Similar Articles

Cited By