Evaluation of Growth, Physiological, and Biochemical Responses of Different L. Varieties Under Drought Stress.

Yang Wang, Sisi Long, Jiyuan Zhang, Puchang Wang, Lili Zhao
Author Information
  1. Yang Wang: College of Animal Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
  2. Sisi Long: College of Animal Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
  3. Jiyuan Zhang: College of Animal Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
  4. Puchang Wang: School of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China. ORCID
  5. Lili Zhao: College of Animal Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China. ORCID

Abstract

Alfalfa (), an important leguminous forage crop, is valued for its high nutritional content, substantial yield, palatability, and broad adaptability. Drought is among the most significant environmental constraints on alfalfa growth, particularly in the karst regions of southwestern China. In this study, we conducted pot experiments to investigate the growth and physiological responses of seven alfalfa varieties introduced into the karst region of Guizhou under drought conditions. The results revealed that drought stress markedly reduced both plant height and aboveground biomass accumulation. Moreover, under drought stress, these alfalfa varieties exhibited increased root length, root surface area, and root tip number; elevated protective enzyme activities; and decreased levels of hydrogen peroxide (HO) and malondialdehyde (MDA), thereby maintaining relatively higher water content. Each of the seven varieties displayed distinct growth and physiological adaptation mechanisms under drought stress. Integrating principal component analysis and membership function analysis, we ranked the drought resistance of these alfalfa varieties from highest to lowest as follows: Crown > WL525 > Colosseo > Victoria > PANGO > Giant 801 > Dimitra. These findings provide valuable insights for introducing drought-resistant alfalfa varieties into karst regions of southwestern China and offer guidance for breeding and cultivation strategies across various environmental conditions.

Keywords

References

  1. Plant J. 2022 Oct;112(2):429-450 [PMID: 36006043]
  2. Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 15;13(1):19963 [PMID: 37968307]
  3. J Plant Physiol. 2014 Jun 15;171(10):842-51 [PMID: 24877676]
  4. Plants (Basel). 2021 Jan 28;10(2): [PMID: 33525688]
  5. Front Plant Sci. 2024 Sep 26;15:1442618 [PMID: 39391771]
  6. Front Plant Sci. 2022 Mar 02;13:785702 [PMID: 35310664]
  7. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 May 23;20(10): [PMID: 31126133]
  8. Plant Physiol. 1987 Jun;84(2):450-5 [PMID: 16665461]
  9. Microorganisms. 2023 Nov 24;11(12): [PMID: 38137995]
  10. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jun 29;23(13): [PMID: 35806246]
  11. Heliyon. 2022 May 19;8(5):e09493 [PMID: 35647359]
  12. Plants (Basel). 2023 May 19;12(10): [PMID: 37653953]
  13. Environ Int. 2005 Aug;31(6):891-5 [PMID: 16023207]
  14. Microsc Res Tech. 2022 Apr;85(4):1267-1281 [PMID: 34813127]
  15. Front Plant Sci. 2022 Sep 08;13:985574 [PMID: 36161026]
  16. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2019 Apr 29;70:407-433 [PMID: 30822114]
  17. Funct Plant Biol. 2023 Jan;50(1):46-57 [PMID: 36031596]
  18. Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 3;9(1):9613 [PMID: 31270427]
  19. Plant Physiol. 1989 Jun;90(2):742-8 [PMID: 16666837]
  20. Plants (Basel). 2021 Oct 06;10(10): [PMID: 34685923]
  21. Plants (Basel). 2021 Apr 24;10(5): [PMID: 33923365]
  22. Front Plant Sci. 2022 Sep 07;13:847166 [PMID: 36160994]
  23. Plant J. 2011 Dec;68(5):871-89 [PMID: 21838776]
  24. J Exp Bot. 2016 Aug;67(15):4545-57 [PMID: 27401910]
  25. Plants (Basel). 2023 Nov 20;12(22): [PMID: 38005804]
  26. Front Plant Sci. 2022 May 03;13:795011 [PMID: 35599860]

Grants

  1. 31560664, 32260340/National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. QJJ[2022]076/Guizhou Provincial Department of Education Natural Science

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0alfalfadrought>varietiesstressanalysisgrowthkarstphysiologicalrootcontentDroughtenvironmentalregionssouthwesternChinasevenconditionsprincipalcomponentmembershipfunctionAlfalfaimportantleguminousforagecropvaluedhighnutritionalsubstantialyieldpalatabilitybroadadaptabilityamongsignificantconstraintsparticularlystudyconductedpotexperimentsinvestigateresponsesintroducedregionGuizhouresultsrevealedmarkedlyreducedplantheightabovegroundbiomassaccumulationMoreoverexhibitedincreasedlengthsurfaceareatipnumberelevatedprotectiveenzymeactivitiesdecreasedlevelshydrogenperoxideHOmalondialdehydeMDAtherebymaintainingrelativelyhigherwaterdisplayeddistinctadaptationmechanismsIntegratingrankedresistancehighestlowestfollows:CrownWL525ColosseoVictoriaPANGOGiant801Dimitrafindingsprovidevaluableinsightsintroducingdrought-resistantofferguidancebreedingcultivationstrategiesacrossvariousEvaluationGrowthPhysiologicalBiochemicalResponsesDifferentLVarietiesStressbiochemicalindicators

Similar Articles

Cited By