Artificial Vision Systems for Fruit Inspection and Classification: Systematic Literature Review.

Ignacio Rojas Santelices, Sandra Cano, Fernando Moreira, ��lvaro Pe��a Fritz
Author Information
  1. Ignacio Rojas Santelices: Doctorate in Smart Industry, Pontificia Universidad Cat��lica de Valpara��so, Avenida Brasil 2141, Valparaiso 2370688, Chile.
  2. Sandra Cano: School of Informatics Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Cat��lica de Valpara��so, Avenida Brasil 2241, Valparaiso 2370688, Chile. ORCID
  3. Fernando Moreira: REMIT (Research on Economics, Management and Information Technologies), IJP (Instituto Jur��dico Portucalense), Universidade Portucalense, Rua Dr. Ant��nio Bernardino de Almeida, 541-619, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal. ORCID
  4. ��lvaro Pe��a Fritz: School of Construction and Transportation Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Cat��lica de Valpara��so, Avenida Brasil 2147, Valparaiso 2370688, Chile. ORCID

Abstract

Fruit sorting and quality inspection using computer vision is a key tool to ensure quality and safety in the fruit industry. This study presents a systematic literature review, following the PRISMA methodology, with the aim of identifying different fields of application, typical hardware configurations, and the techniques and algorithms used for fruit sorting. In this study, 56 articles published between 2015 and 2024 were analyzed, selected from relevant databases such as Web of Science and Scopus. The results indicate that the main fields of application include orchards, industrial processing lines, and final consumption points, such as supermarkets and homes, each with specific technical requirements. Regarding hardware, RGB cameras and LED lighting systems predominate in controlled applications, although multispectral cameras are also important in complex applications such as foreign material detection. Processing techniques include traditional algorithms such as Otsu and Sobel for segmentation and deep learning models such as ResNet and VGG, often optimized with transfer learning for classification. This systematic review could provide a basic guide for the development of fruit quality inspection and classification systems in different environments.

Keywords

References

  1. Sensors (Basel). 2022 Oct 26;22(21): [PMID: 36365888]
  2. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71 [PMID: 33782057]
  3. Micromachines (Basel). 2023 Feb 27;14(3): [PMID: 36984977]
  4. Data Brief. 2021 Dec 07;40:107686 [PMID: 34917715]
  5. Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 13;23(2): [PMID: 36679749]
  6. Data Brief. 2023 Nov 30;52:109876 [PMID: 38161658]
  7. Sensors (Basel). 2016 Jun 30;16(7): [PMID: 27376292]
  8. Plant Phenomics. 2021 Oct 8;2021:9874597 [PMID: 34708214]
  9. Sensors (Basel). 2023 Nov 30;23(23): [PMID: 38067916]
  10. PLoS One. 2024 Jul 30;19(7):e0305292 [PMID: 39078864]
  11. Sensors (Basel). 2018 Sep 03;18(9): [PMID: 30177667]
  12. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 Oct;28(10):5765-5772 [PMID: 34588889]

MeSH Term

Fruit
Algorithms
Artificial Intelligence
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0qualityfruitinspectionvisionlearningclassificationFruitsortingcomputerstudysystematicreviewdifferentfieldsapplicationhardwaretechniquesalgorithmsincludeprocessingcamerassystemsapplicationsdeepartificialusingkeytoolensuresafetyindustrypresentsliteraturefollowingPRISMAmethodologyaimidentifyingtypicalconfigurationsused56articlespublished20152024analyzedselectedrelevantdatabasesWebScienceScopusresultsindicatemainorchardsindustriallinesfinalconsumptionpointssupermarketshomesspecifictechnicalrequirementsRegardingRGBLEDlightingpredominatecontrolledalthoughmultispectralalsoimportantcomplexforeignmaterialdetectionProcessingtraditionalOtsuSobelsegmentationmodelsResNetVGGoftenoptimizedtransferprovidebasicguidedevelopmentenvironmentsArtificialVisionSystemsInspectionClassification:SystematicLiteratureReviewintelligenceimagecontrol

Similar Articles

Cited By