Study on the application and evaluation method of Zen aesthetic style in furniture design under the background of sustainability.

Tao Wang, Basyarah Hamat, Liming Zhang, Yanxiao Zhao, Leah Ling Li Pang
Author Information
  1. Tao Wang: Anyang Institute of Technology, Anyang, 455000, Henan, China. 260695815@qq.com.
  2. Basyarah Hamat: Faculty of Artificial Intelligence, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, 54100, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  3. Liming Zhang: GongQing Institute of Science and Technology, Gongqing, 332000, Jiangxi, China.
  4. Yanxiao Zhao: Faculty of Artificial Intelligence, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, 54100, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 2361712363@qq.com.
  5. Leah Ling Li Pang: Faculty of Artificial Intelligence, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, 54100, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Abstract

This study aims to explore the application of Zen aesthetics in contemporary furniture design within a sustainable context through rational data analysis, providing innovative insights and a reference framework for modern furniture design. First, grounded theory was employed to collect and evaluate design principles and elements through expert interviews, leading to the establishment of a hierarchical model. Next, the analytic hierarchy process was used to analyze and prioritize the elements of cultural and creative product design by calculating their weights. Finally, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was applied for scheme selection and optimization. This study utilized Zen aesthetic-style tea table as a case study, the design was analyzed from the perspectives of aesthetic, functionality, emotionality and safety. The design scheme was optimized by incorporating Zen aesthetic principles, achieving an organic integration of Zen cultural elements with modern furniture design. The feasibility of this approach was validated through the design of a tea table. This comprehensive method addresses the gap in applying Zen aesthetics to modern furniture design, providing a scientific and systematic tool for the design and evaluation of contemporary furniture.

Keywords

References

  1. Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 4;14(1):20550 [PMID: 39232124]
  2. Chin Med. 2022 Feb 22;17(1):27 [PMID: 35193642]
  3. PLoS One. 2023 Nov 21;18(11):e0286682 [PMID: 37988342]
  4. J Med Ethics. 2022 Nov;48(11):937-938 [PMID: 35105700]
  5. Sci Total Environ. 2020 Feb 20;704:135275 [PMID: 31796272]
  6. PLoS One. 2024 May 13;19(5):e0301678 [PMID: 38739577]
  7. Am J Psychother. 2001;55(1):1-21 [PMID: 11291186]
  8. PLoS One. 2024 Oct 29;19(10):e0311297 [PMID: 39471190]
  9. PLoS One. 2023 Apr 27;18(4):e0282956 [PMID: 37104487]
  10. Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 05;13:986627 [PMID: 36687973]
  11. J Relig Health. 2017 Oct;56(5):1720-1739 [PMID: 28718052]
  12. Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 19;11:1203830 [PMID: 37404280]
  13. PLoS One. 2024 Apr 11;19(4):e0302005 [PMID: 38603676]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0designZenfurnitureevaluationaestheticstudymodernelementscomprehensivemethodapplicationaestheticscontemporaryprovidingtheoryprincipleshierarchyprocessculturalschemeteatablestyleaimsexplorewithinsustainablecontextrationaldataanalysisinnovativeinsightsreferenceframeworkFirstgroundedemployedcollectevaluateexpertinterviewsleadingestablishmenthierarchicalmodelNextanalyticusedanalyzeprioritizecreativeproductcalculatingweightsFinallyfuzzyappliedselectionoptimizationutilizedaesthetic-stylecaseanalyzedperspectivesfunctionalityemotionalitysafetyoptimizedincorporatingachievingorganicintegrationfeasibilityapproachvalidatedaddressesgapapplyingscientificsystematictoolStudybackgroundsustainabilityAnalyticAHPFuzzyFCEGroundedGTSustainable

Similar Articles

Cited By