Physical-intellectual badminton teaching intervention for children with intellectual disabilities.

Yu Wang, Delai Zhou, Chuang Liu, Lingyu Long, Gong Cheng
Author Information
  1. Yu Wang: Department of Theory and Methodology of Sport and Physical Education, Moscow State University of Sport and Tourism, Moscow, Russia.
  2. Delai Zhou: Department of Physical Education, Harbin Far East Institute of Technology, Limin Development Zone, Harbin, China.
  3. Chuang Liu: Department of Theory and Methodology of Sport and Physical Education, Moscow State University of Sport and Tourism, Moscow, Russia.
  4. Lingyu Long: Department of Physical Education, Harbin Far East Institute of Technology, Limin Development Zone, Harbin, China.
  5. Gong Cheng: Department of Theory and Methodology of Sport and Physical Education, Moscow State University of Sport and Tourism, Moscow, Russia.

Abstract

Objective: To promote the healthy development of adolescents with intellectual disabilities, this study uses badminton to combine sports intervention with cognitive intervention to explore the content of sports teaching and cognitive intervention programs suitable for the learning of students with intellectual disabilities.
Methods: This research selected 26 mildly mentally disabled students in special education schools (age: 14.5��������0.8���years old), the subjects were randomly assigned to three groups by the digital randomization method, which badminton physical intelligence group (BSI), badminton group (BS) and control group (CON), with BSI conducting "physical intelligence" integration badminton intervention, and BS conducting badminton intervention, the intervention cycle was 12���weeks, with 3 teaching sessions per week, each session lasted for 40���min. The subjects' cognitive abilities and basic motor skills were analyzed.
Results: The results showed that BSI had highly significant differences in all cognitive ability test items (���<���0.01); BS had significant differences only in visual attention, visual memory, and motor imitation (���<���0.05). The results of incremental changes between groups before and after the intervention showed that BSI compared with CON had significant differences in all aspects except in object constancy (���<���0.05); BS compared with CON had higher incremental means than CON in visual attention, visual memory, and movement imitation, with significant differences (���<���0.05); BSI compared with BS had significant differences in all aspects except in object constancy and visual memory aspects, there is a significant difference (���<���0.05).
Conclusion: The "Body-Smart Integration" badminton intervention can improve the cognitive ability of students with intellectual disabilities in visual, auditory, imitation, concept learning, object permanence, etc., and the effect of improving the cognitive ability of students with intellectual disabilities is better than that of the badminton group and the control group.

Keywords

References

  1. Evol Appl. 2010 Jan;3(1):52-63 [PMID: 25567903]
  2. Percept Mot Skills. 2014 Aug;119(1):1-5 [PMID: 25153733]
  3. Psychol Bull. 2018 Jun;144(6):557-583 [PMID: 29517261]
  4. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019 Oct;29(10):1546-1562 [PMID: 31125468]
  5. Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Nov 08;9(11): [PMID: 34828567]
  6. Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Nov;23(11):913-926 [PMID: 31606386]
  7. BMC Public Health. 2024 May 10;24(1):1283 [PMID: 38730396]
  8. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2012 Jul;25(4):319-28 [PMID: 22711480]
  9. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018 Apr 27;67(6):1-23 [PMID: 29701730]
  10. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2021 Dec 03;70(11):1-16 [PMID: 34855725]
  11. PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0144691 [PMID: 26717409]
  12. Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Mar;26(3):191-203 [PMID: 35031211]
  13. PLoS One. 2021 Dec 21;16(12):e0261298 [PMID: 34932566]
  14. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2022;122(4):36-43 [PMID: 35485063]
  15. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Apr;63:106-23 [PMID: 26877104]
  16. Lancet. 2021 Jul 31;398(10298):443-455 [PMID: 34302764]
  17. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2023 Apr 5;17(5):632-638 [PMID: 37711351]
  18. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 21;19(9): [PMID: 35564459]
  19. Neuroimage. 2016 Jul 1;134:113-121 [PMID: 27063068]
  20. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2022 Mar 31;16(1):27 [PMID: 35361232]
  21. Psychophysiology. 2016 Nov;53(11):1611-1626 [PMID: 27556572]
  22. Front Psychol. 2015 Dec 11;6:1893 [PMID: 26696946]
  23. Biol Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 1;95(5):453-464 [PMID: 37393046]
  24. PeerJ Comput Sci. 2023 May 30;9:e1400 [PMID: 37346665]
  25. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;58(4):474-503 [PMID: 27943285]
  26. Neuroscience. 2018 Apr 15;376:94-107 [PMID: 29462703]
  27. J Phys Act Health. 2018 Apr 1;15(4):247-254 [PMID: 29183261]
  28. Res Dev Disabil. 2019 Feb;85:1-7 [PMID: 30388506]
  29. Educ Res. 2015 Jun-Jul;44(5):278-292 [PMID: 27445414]
  30. Annu Rev Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;74:137-165 [PMID: 35961038]
  31. Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 17;8(1):12382 [PMID: 30120283]
  32. Cortex. 2015 Oct;71:49-57 [PMID: 26159323]
  33. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2024 Jun;25(3):541-553 [PMID: 38060062]
  34. Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Oct;69:48-52 [PMID: 30007147]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0interventionbadmintoncognitiveintellectualsignificantvisualdisabilitiesgroupBSIBSdifferences���<���0studentsCONability05teachingmemoryimitationcomparedaspectsobjectsportslearninggroupsphysicalcontrolconductingbasicmotorskillsresultsshowedattentionincrementalexceptconstancymovementObjective:promotehealthydevelopmentadolescentsstudyusescombineexplorecontentprogramssuitableMethods:researchselected26mildlymentallydisabledspecialeducationschoolsage:145��������08���yearsoldsubjectsrandomlyassignedthreedigitalrandomizationmethodintelligence"physicalintelligence"integrationcycle12���weeks3sessionsperweeksessionlasted40���minsubjects'abilitiesanalyzedResults:highlytestitems01changeshighermeansdifferenceConclusion:"Body-SmartIntegration"canimproveauditoryconceptpermanenceetceffectimprovingbetterPhysical-intellectualchildrendisabilityquality���physicalintelligence���fusion

Similar Articles

Cited By