Effectiveness of Titanium Occlusive Barriers in Guided Bone Regeneration: A Prospective Analysis of Vertical and Horizontal Bone Augmentation.

Luis Leiva-Gea, Paulino Sánchez-Palomino, Alfonso Lendínez-Jurado, María Daniela Corte-Torres, Isabel Leiva-Gea, Antonio Leiva-Gea
Author Information
  1. Luis Leiva-Gea: Clínicas ClearDent, 23006 Jaén, Spain.
  2. Paulino Sánchez-Palomino: Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain.
  3. Alfonso Lendínez-Jurado: Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, 29011 Málaga, Spain. ORCID
  4. María Daniela Corte-Torres: Biobanco del Principado de Asturias, FINBA-ISPA, 33011 Oviedo, Spain. ORCID
  5. Isabel Leiva-Gea: Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, 29011 Málaga, Spain.
  6. Antonio Leiva-Gea: Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA)-Plataforma BIONAND, 29010 Málaga, Spain.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a widely used technique in oral and maxillofacial surgery to restore lost bone. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of titanium occlusive barriers in GBR for increasing bone volume in both vertical and horizontal dimensions.
METHODS: A prospective analysis was conducted on 11 patients (15 cases) undergoing bone augmentation with titanium barriers combined with bone graft biomaterials for dental implant placement. Bone gain was assessed using pre- and postoperative low-dose cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements in vertical and horizontal planes. Histological analyses evaluated the quality and vascularization of the regenerated bone.
RESULTS: Significant bone volume increases were observed, with a mean vertical gain of 7.60 mm (SD 0.23) and a horizontal gain of 5.44 mm (SD 0.39). Histological examination confirmed well-vascularized regenerated bone with minimal residual graft material, effective integration, and the formation of keratinized gingiva.
CONCLUSIONS: Titanium occlusive barriers in GBR provide a reliable and minimally invasive method for substantial bone regeneration, showing advantages such as ease of handling and reduced invasiveness. Additional studies are recommended to validate these findings and evaluate long-term outcomes.

Keywords

References

  1. Periodontol 2000. 2022 Feb;88(1):86-102 [PMID: 35103322]
  2. Implant Dent. 2006 Mar;15(1):8-17 [PMID: 16569956]
  3. Periodontol 2000. 2023 Oct;93(1):277-288 [PMID: 37533162]
  4. J Clin Periodontol. 2013 May;40(5):527-41 [PMID: 23461721]
  5. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Dec;43(10):2183-8 [PMID: 26603108]
  6. Biomimetics (Basel). 2023 Mar 06;8(1): [PMID: 36975336]
  7. Periodontol 2000. 2015 Jun;68(1):122-34 [PMID: 25867983]
  8. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Dec 18;21(1):282 [PMID: 34922454]
  9. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Feb;14(1):63-71 [PMID: 12562367]
  10. Periodontol 2000. 2023 Feb;91(1):126-144 [PMID: 36700299]
  11. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Sep 22;33(1):41–50 [PMID: 28938030]
  12. J Oral Implantol. 2018 Jun;44(3):219-224 [PMID: 29457935]
  13. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2019 Sep 05;10(3):e2 [PMID: 31620264]
  14. Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):141-158 [PMID: 34826029]
  15. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Nov;30(9):1323-41 [PMID: 22770690]
  16. J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jun;46 Suppl 21:195-223 [PMID: 30623987]
  17. Ann Anat. 2022 Aug;243:151950 [PMID: 35504519]
  18. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Feb;46(2):261-266 [PMID: 27865631]
  19. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Jun 28;10:916967 [PMID: 35837554]
  20. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Mar;29 Suppl 15:32-49 [PMID: 29498129]
  21. Materials (Basel). 2021 Nov 04;14(21): [PMID: 34772167]
  22. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Mar;24(3):312-9 [PMID: 22092958]
  23. Int J Oral Sci. 2020 Dec 30;12(1):37 [PMID: 33380722]
  24. J Clin Periodontol. 2023 Jun;50(6):784-795 [PMID: 36872046]
  25. Periodontol 2000. 2023 Oct;93(1):9-25 [PMID: 38194351]
  26. Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Feb 23;7(1):15 [PMID: 33619644]
  27. Periodontol 2000. 2023 Oct;93(1):153-182 [PMID: 36721380]
  28. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Oct;21(5):853-861 [PMID: 31456345]
  29. J Oral Implantol. 2018 Aug;44(4):293-299 [PMID: 29498903]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0bonebarriersregenerationGBRtitaniumverticalhorizontalBonegainGuidedevaluateocclusivevolumeaugmentationgraftdentalHistologicalregeneratedmmSD0TitaniumBACKGROUND:widelyusedtechniqueoralmaxillofacialsurgeryrestorelostaimstudyeffectivenessincreasingdimensionsMETHODS:prospectiveanalysisconducted11patients15casesundergoingcombinedbiomaterialsimplantplacementassessedusingpre-postoperativelow-doseconebeamcomputedtomographyCBCTmeasurementsplanesanalysesevaluatedqualityvascularizationRESULTS:Significantincreasesobservedmean7602354439examinationconfirmedwell-vascularizedminimalresidualmaterialeffectiveintegrationformationkeratinizedgingivaCONCLUSIONS:providereliableminimallyinvasivemethodsubstantialshowingadvantageseasehandlingreducedinvasivenessAdditionalstudiesrecommendedvalidatefindingslong-termoutcomesEffectivenessOcclusiveBarriersRegeneration:ProspectiveAnalysisVerticalHorizontalAugmentationimplantsguided

Similar Articles

Cited By