Critical Thinking and Metacognition: Pathways to Empathy and Psychological Well-Being.

Miguel H Guamanga, Carlos Saiz, Silvia F Rivas, Patricia Morales Bueno
Author Information
  1. Miguel H Guamanga: Faculty of Human Sciences, Universidad Icesi, Cali 760000, Colombia. ORCID
  2. Carlos Saiz: Department of Basic Psychology, Psychobiology and Methodology of Behavioral Sciences, University of Salamanca, 37005 Salamanca, Spain. ORCID
  3. Silvia F Rivas: Department of Basic Psychology, Psychobiology and Methodology of Behavioral Sciences, University of Salamanca, 37005 Salamanca, Spain. ORCID
  4. Patricia Morales Bueno: Academic Department of Sciences, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Campus PUCP, 1801 Lima, Peru. ORCID

Abstract

This study examines the relationships between critical thinking, metacognition, psychological well-being, and empathy using structural equation modeling. The study sample consists of 155 university students from a higher education institution in Spain, who completed the PENCRISAL, the metacognitive abilities inventory, the Ryff psychological well-being scale, and the empathy quotient, which assess these psychological constructs. The results indicate that critical thinking has a direct positive effect on metacognition, which, in turn, is significantly associated with higher levels of psychological well-being and empathy. These findings reinforce the essential role of critical thinking in fostering cognitive self-regulation and socioemotional competencies. Furthermore, this study provides empirical evidence supporting the integration of critical thinking into educational programs, emphasizing its potential to enhance reflective thinking, emotional awareness, and interpersonal understanding.

Keywords

References

  1. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Feb 28;358(1430):361-74 [PMID: 12639333]
  2. Psychother Psychosom. 2014;83(1):10-28 [PMID: 24281296]
  3. J Autism Dev Disord. 2004 Apr;34(2):163-75 [PMID: 15162935]
  4. Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 13;15:1425929 [PMID: 39606197]
  5. Psicothema. 2006 Aug;18(3):572-7 [PMID: 17296089]
  6. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Oct;69(4):719-27 [PMID: 7473027]
  7. J Intell. 2021 Apr 07;9(2): [PMID: 33916939]
  8. J Intell. 2022 Aug 04;10(3): [PMID: 35997409]
  9. J Intell. 2023 Dec 16;11(12): [PMID: 38132844]
  10. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. 2004 Jun;3(2):71-100 [PMID: 15537986]
  11. J Soc Psychol. 2022 Jan 2;162(1):143-160 [PMID: 35083952]
  12. Soc Indic Res. 2010 Jul;97(3):357-373 [PMID: 20543875]
  13. Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 26;10:1455 [PMID: 31293487]
  14. J Nurs Educ. 2019 Mar 1;58(3):169-172 [PMID: 30835805]
  15. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 16;16(10): [PMID: 31100799]
  16. Psychol Med. 2004 Jul;34(5):911-9 [PMID: 15500311]
  17. Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31 [PMID: 17835457]
  18. J Intell. 2023 Nov 28;11(12): [PMID: 38132837]
  19. Am Psychol. 1998 Apr;53(4):449-55 [PMID: 9572008]
  20. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2012 Jul;4(2):151-66 [PMID: 26286975]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0thinkingcriticalpsychologicalwell-beingempathystudymetacognitionhigherexaminesrelationshipsusingstructuralequationmodelingsampleconsists155universitystudentseducationinstitutionSpaincompletedPENCRISALmetacognitiveabilitiesinventoryRyffscalequotientassessconstructsresultsindicatedirectpositiveeffectturnsignificantlyassociatedlevelsfindingsreinforceessentialrolefosteringcognitiveself-regulationsocioemotionalcompetenciesFurthermoreprovidesempiricalevidencesupportingintegrationeducationalprogramsemphasizingpotentialenhancereflectiveemotionalawarenessinterpersonalunderstandingCriticalThinkingMetacognition:PathwaysEmpathyPsychologicalWell-Being

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.