Water Quality Criteria of Dieldrin for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms and Wildlife Using a Tissue Residue Approach.

Li Xie, Xuemei Li, Liangwen Bao, Yuexin Zhang, Hailei Su, Xuesong Liu, Fanfan Wang, Yuan Wei, Ningning Ji, Min Zhou
Author Information
  1. Li Xie: State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China. ORCID
  2. Xuemei Li: State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.
  3. Liangwen Bao: State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.
  4. Yuexin Zhang: State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China. ORCID
  5. Hailei Su: State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.
  6. Xuesong Liu: State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.
  7. Fanfan Wang: State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.
  8. Yuan Wei: State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.
  9. Ningning Ji: State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.
  10. Min Zhou: State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.

Abstract

Dieldrin is legacy organochlorine insecticide, which was listed in the Stockholm Convention because of its persistence, bioaccumulation and toxicity. However, it is still present in the environment and in organisms two decades after its ban. The current criteria used for risk assessment in China are based on acute toxicity data in water columns without considering the bioavailability and bioaccumulation, which accordingly lead to the under-protection of aquatic organisms and wildlife. In this study, the water quality criteria (WQC) for dieldrin were derived from a combination of tissue-based toxicity data and the bioaccumulation factor (BAF) to better protect aquatic ecosystems. The dieldrin residue data in surface water in China were obtained by literature review and the ecological risk was assessed using the quotient method. Combined with a BAF of 58,884.37 L/kg estimated by the model, the WQC were calculated as needing to be 3.86 and 1.4 ng/L to protect aquatic life and aquatic-dependent wildlife, respectively. The results of the risk assessment revealed the potential high risk posed by dieldrin bioaccumulation. This study provides scientific guidance for the determination of the water quality standard for dieldrin and to ensure the risk management of the aquatic environment in China.

Keywords

References

  1. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2013 Dec;32(12):2786-91 [PMID: 23983078]
  2. Poult Sci. 1976 Jan;55(1):212-9 [PMID: 934984]
  3. J Anim Sci. 1970 Sep;31(3):567-75 [PMID: 5520348]
  4. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1999 Jan;42(1):22-9 [PMID: 9931234]
  5. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1997 Feb;58(2):334-40 [PMID: 8975813]
  6. Water Res. 2022 Jan 1;208:117848 [PMID: 34781190]
  7. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2005 Aug;24(8):2094-105 [PMID: 16152984]
  8. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1975 Jan;13(1):108-16 [PMID: 1131431]
  9. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1979 Jan;21(1-2):93-7 [PMID: 444716]
  10. Environ Health Perspect. 1996 Apr;104 Suppl 2:353-60 [PMID: 9182042]
  11. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2021 Jun;106(6):1071-1076 [PMID: 33811510]
  12. Sci Total Environ. 2023 Dec 15;904:166709 [PMID: 37659555]
  13. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1977 Jun;17(6):637-44 [PMID: 880379]
  14. Environ Monit Assess. 2013 Nov;185(11):9265-77 [PMID: 23729160]
  15. J Health Pollut. 2018 Mar 12;8(17):1-5 [PMID: 30524843]
  16. Environ Geochem Health. 2018 Dec;40(6):2525-2538 [PMID: 29748733]
  17. Environ Pollut. 2000 Dec;110(3):375-91 [PMID: 15092817]
  18. J Environ Sci Health B. 2020;55(6):530-538 [PMID: 32525731]
  19. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1976;4(3):349-60 [PMID: 9913]
  20. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2005 Apr;1(2):142-51 [PMID: 16639896]
  21. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 Jul;28(7):3741-3744 [PMID: 34220226]
  22. Toxicology. 1993 Aug 27;81(3):165-71 [PMID: 8212022]
  23. Environ Pollut. 2016 Dec;219:315-322 [PMID: 27814548]
  24. Sci Total Environ. 2023 Feb 1;858(Pt 1):159734 [PMID: 36349626]
  25. Environ Res. 2014 May;131:188-214 [PMID: 24727642]
  26. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2014 Jan;21(1):28-32 [PMID: 23608985]
  27. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1969 Sep;15(2):345-73 [PMID: 5804749]
  28. Sci Total Environ. 2023 Oct 27;:168158 [PMID: 39491187]
  29. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jun 20;774:145749 [PMID: 33610981]
  30. Am J Vet Res. 1972 Mar;33(3):579-83 [PMID: 5014466]
  31. Mar Pollut Bull. 2002;45(1-12):192-202 [PMID: 12398385]
  32. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2021 Sep;40(9):2394-2405 [PMID: 34062012]
  33. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2007 May;26(5):927-34 [PMID: 17521139]
  34. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1977;6(2-3):213-9 [PMID: 901002]
  35. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1974;2(3):222-32 [PMID: 4424599]
  36. Chemosphere. 2019 Sep;231:546-561 [PMID: 31151015]
  37. Chemosphere. 2007 Jan;66(7):1175-82 [PMID: 16979696]
  38. Food Cosmet Toxicol. 1973 Jun;11(3):415-32 [PMID: 4353861]
  39. Water Res. 2020 Oct 1;184:116141 [PMID: 32784075]
  40. Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Apr 17;190(5):289 [PMID: 29667072]
  41. Toxicol Res. 2021 Mar 20;38(2):149-157 [PMID: 35419272]
  42. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 1973 Mar;40(1):31-9 [PMID: 4717635]
  43. Sci Total Environ. 2024 May 20;926:171800 [PMID: 38508255]
  44. J Agric Food Chem. 2012 Mar 28;60(12):2982-8 [PMID: 22404818]
  45. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1980 Mar 30;53(1):75-82 [PMID: 6770493]
  46. Mar Pollut Bull. 2002 Aug;44(8):752-60 [PMID: 12269478]
  47. Aquat Toxicol. 2002 Apr;57(1-2):85-100 [PMID: 11879940]
  48. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2021 Feb;40(2):293-308 [PMID: 33170526]
  49. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2020 May 1;507:110764 [PMID: 32112812]
  50. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Sep 1;785:147287 [PMID: 33933771]

Grants

  1. 2022YFC3702403/National Key Research and Development Program of China
  2. 42394154/National Natural Science Foundation of China

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0riskbioaccumulationwaterdieldrincriteriaaquatictoxicityChinadatawildlifequalityDieldrinenvironmentorganismsassessmentstudyWQCBAFprotectecologicallegacyorganochlorineinsecticidelistedStockholmConventionpersistenceHoweverstillpresenttwodecadesbancurrentusedbasedacutecolumnswithoutconsideringbioavailabilityaccordinglyleadunder-protectionderivedcombinationtissue-basedfactorbetterecosystemsresiduesurfaceobtainedliteraturereviewassessedusingquotientmethodCombined5888437L/kgestimatedmodelcalculatedneeding38614ng/Llifeaquatic-dependentrespectivelyresultsrevealedpotentialhighposedprovidesscientificguidancedeterminationstandardensuremanagementWaterQualityCriteriaProtectionAquaticOrganismsWildlifeUsingTissueResidueApproach

Similar Articles

Cited By