What can be learned from the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on work participation among people with work disabilities? A qualitative practice & policy perspective approach.

Mara de Visser, Trees Juurlink, Astrid Bosma, Marloes Zijl, Johannes R Anema, Maaike A Huysmans
Author Information
  1. Mara de Visser: Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Van Der Boechorstraat 7, Amsterdam, 1081 BT, the Netherlands. m.devisser1@amsterdamumc.nl.
  2. Trees Juurlink: Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Van Der Boechorstraat 7, Amsterdam, 1081 BT, the Netherlands.
  3. Astrid Bosma: Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Van Der Boechorstraat 7, Amsterdam, 1081 BT, the Netherlands.
  4. Marloes Zijl: Social Security Institute Netherlands (UWV), La Guardiaweg 94-114, 1043 DL, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  5. Johannes R Anema: Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Van Der Boechorstraat 7, Amsterdam, 1081 BT, the Netherlands.
  6. Maaike A Huysmans: Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Van Der Boechorstraat 7, Amsterdam, 1081 BT, the Netherlands.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies among people with work disabilities (WD) showed that during the COVID-19 pandemic they were at risk for negative outcomes on work participation and health. These studies focused on people's own accounts of their difficulties to work and did not include the policy and practice perspective. The aim of the present study was to explore the policy and practice perspective on what can be learned from the impact of the COVID-19 crisis, and what is needed to enhance work participation among people with WD, in times of crisis and beyond.
METHODS: We used a multi-stakeholder perspective qualitative approach. Between March 2021 and September 2022, twenty-five semi-structured in-depth online interviews were conducted with occupational health professionals (13), employers (7) and policymakers (5). Participants were asked to share their experiences about employees or job seekers with work disabilities on (re)gaining and maintaining paid employment, barriers and facilitators for work participation during the Covid-19 crisis and what is needed to enhance work participation among people with WD in times of crisis and beyond. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis.
RESULTS: The results indicated that, although employers rapidly implemented new working arrangements, people with WD had a vulnerable labour market position during the COVID-19 crisis, especially those with temporary contracts. Job loss and detrimental effects on mental health were identified. Other barriers to work participation included hampered collaboration between stakeholders during lockdowns and fewer job opportunities due to workplace shutdowns. Nevertheless, employers and occupational health professionals noticed that some employees were surprisingly flexible and capable with regard to performing alternative work tasks. We also identified ways to improve work participation for people with WD, including simplifying legislation and establishing sustainable policies on employment, investing in career development, creating an inclusive organizational culture and increasing accessibility to information and support assistance.
CONCLUSIONS: People with WD had a vulnerable labour market position during the COVID-19 crisis. The introduction of new working arrangements became widespread during the COVID-19 crisis, which had both positive and negative consequences for people with WD. Our results showed that improving work participation for people with WD requires a multifaceted approach, which can be achieved by the practical and policy recommendations offered by this study.

Keywords

References

  1. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:229-53 [PMID: 24641559]
  2. Work. 2023;74(2):381-406 [PMID: 36314186]
  3. Occup Environ Med. 2014 Oct;71(10):730-6 [PMID: 24556535]
  4. Economist (Leiden). 2022;170(2):279-303 [PMID: 35529244]
  5. Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 May 31;3:861561 [PMID: 36189072]
  6. J Occup Rehabil. 2012 Jun;22(2):182-95 [PMID: 22038297]
  7. J Occup Rehabil. 2022 Sep;32(3):464-472 [PMID: 35037157]
  8. Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Dec;46(26):6376-6383 [PMID: 38515281]
  9. J Occup Rehabil. 2017 Sep;27(3):393-404 [PMID: 27654622]
  10. J Occup Rehabil. 2020 Dec;30(4):521-536 [PMID: 33156435]
  11. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Apr 1;48(3):173-189 [PMID: 34878557]
  12. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Jul;102(7):1420-1423 [PMID: 33839102]
  13. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57 [PMID: 17872937]
  14. Disabil Health J. 2021 Jul;14(3):101090 [PMID: 33715986]
  15. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 12;12:709732 [PMID: 34712153]
  16. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 27;16(10): [PMID: 31137817]
  17. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;56(7):1147-1160 [PMID: 33866384]
  18. Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Oct;39(21):2134-2147 [PMID: 27936968]
  19. Eur J Public Health. 2021 Nov 9;31(Supplement_4):iv40-iv49 [PMID: 34751369]
  20. Int J Health Serv. 2021 Apr;51(2):226-228 [PMID: 33430684]
  21. J Public Health (Oxf). 2021 Sep 22;43(3):472-478 [PMID: 33429436]
  22. J Occup Rehabil. 2021 Jun;31(2):444-453 [PMID: 33118130]
  23. J Occup Rehabil. 2024 Jul 2;: [PMID: 38954248]
  24. J Occup Rehabil. 2018 Mar;28(1):1-15 [PMID: 28224415]
  25. J Occup Rehabil. 2021 Dec;31(4):916-949 [PMID: 33978875]
  26. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 Nov;75(11):1078-1083 [PMID: 33980720]
  27. Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 10;10(5): [PMID: 35628020]
  28. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Sep - Oct;14(5):965-967 [PMID: 32604016]
  29. Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Aug;44(16):4303-4310 [PMID: 33789067]
  30. J Occup Rehabil. 2005 Sep;15(3):435-45 [PMID: 16124123]
  31. BMC Public Health. 2023 May 26;23(1):966 [PMID: 37237345]

MeSH Term

Humans
COVID-19
Qualitative Research
Persons with Disabilities
Employment
Male
Female
Adult
Work Engagement
Pandemics
Middle Aged
SARS-CoV-2

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0workpeopleWDparticipationcrisisCOVID-19healthamongpolicyperspectivepracticestudycanapproachemployersstudiesdisabilitiesshowedpandemicnegativelearnedimpactneededenhancetimesbeyondqualitativeoccupationalprofessionalsemployeesjobemploymentbarriersresultsnewworkingarrangementsvulnerablelabourmarketpositionidentifiedBACKGROUND:Previousriskoutcomesfocusedpeople'saccountsdifficultiesincludeaimpresentexploreMETHODS:usedmulti-stakeholderMarch2021September2022twenty-fivesemi-structuredin-depthonlineinterviewsconducted137policymakers5ParticipantsaskedshareexperiencesseekersregainingmaintainingpaidfacilitatorsCovid-19DataanalysedusingthematiccontentanalysisRESULTS:indicatedalthoughrapidlyimplementedespeciallytemporarycontractsJoblossdetrimentaleffectsmentalincludedhamperedcollaborationstakeholderslockdownsfeweropportunitiesdueworkplaceshutdownsNeverthelessnoticedsurprisinglyflexiblecapableregardperformingalternativetasksalsowaysimproveincludingsimplifyinglegislationestablishingsustainablepoliciesinvestingcareerdevelopmentcreatinginclusiveorganizationalcultureincreasingaccessibilityinformationsupportassistanceCONCLUSIONS:Peopleintroductionbecamewidespreadpositiveconsequencesimprovingrequiresmultifacetedachievedpracticalrecommendationsoffereddisabilities?&DisabilityEmploymentNeedsOccupationalservicesQualitative

Similar Articles

Cited By