Developments in Chinese Attitudes to Animal Welfare.

Clive J C Phillips
Author Information
  1. Clive J C Phillips: Sustainability Policy (CUSP) Institute, Curtin University, Kent St., Bentley, Perth 6102, Australia. ORCID

Abstract

China has strong traditions of respect for animals, but momentous changes in recent history have changed society dramatically, and it cannot be assumed that animal welfare is always good. Farm animal production is being intensified rapidly, which can reduce resources offered to animals, in particular space for comfortable living. However, amongst workers in the animal industries, there is little optimism about their ability or need to improve animal welfare. Nevertheless, there is growing attention to animal welfare science in China, which is focused on remote sensing and technological approaches. The Chinese government currently has relatively little involvement in supporting good animal welfare standards, although legislation is in place. Attitudes are influenced by many factors, including the law, age, experience, occupation, and gender. The relatively strong involvement of women in caring for farm animals is encouraging as they tend to have more empathetic attitudes toward animals. It is concluded that attitudes are changing rapidly, but so are animal production systems, which make the development and improvement of animal welfare on farms especially important.

Keywords

References

  1. Altern Lab Anim. 2013 Nov;41(5):351-7 [PMID: 24329743]
  2. Animals (Basel). 2021 Sep 13;11(9): [PMID: 34573646]
  3. Animals (Basel). 2019 Mar 28;9(4): [PMID: 30925747]
  4. Animals (Basel). 2022 Nov 14;12(22): [PMID: 36428368]
  5. Animals (Basel). 2017 Jan 25;7(2): [PMID: 28125058]
  6. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2015 Mar;54(2):181-91 [PMID: 25836965]
  7. Animals (Basel). 2020 Mar 24;10(3): [PMID: 32213957]
  8. Biodivers Conserv. 2008;17(6):1493-1516 [PMID: 32214694]
  9. Animals (Basel). 2019 Oct 24;9(11): [PMID: 31652966]
  10. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2017 Jul-Sep;20(3):205-218 [PMID: 28541779]
  11. Animals (Basel). 2023 Oct 08;13(19): [PMID: 37835750]
  12. PLoS One. 2014 Oct 14;9(10):e109177 [PMID: 25314159]
  13. Animals (Basel). 2019 Mar 19;9(3): [PMID: 30893917]
  14. Animals (Basel). 2022 Nov 06;12(21): [PMID: 36359175]
  15. Animals (Basel). 2010 Dec 09;1(1):7-26 [PMID: 26486211]
  16. Animals (Basel). 2024 May 30;14(11): [PMID: 38891672]
  17. Animals (Basel). 2022 May 26;12(11): [PMID: 35681831]
  18. Animals (Basel). 2021 Jul 10;11(7): [PMID: 34359187]
  19. Animals (Basel). 2022 Jan 10;12(2): [PMID: 35049779]
  20. Meat Sci. 2022 Dec;194:108982 [PMID: 36137353]
  21. Animals (Basel). 2021 Apr 27;11(5): [PMID: 33925746]
  22. Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 04;11:1824 [PMID: 32849075]
  23. Animals (Basel). 2021 Mar 17;11(3): [PMID: 33803067]
  24. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2022 Jul-Sep;25(3):275-286 [PMID: 33843378]
  25. Anim Welf. 2023 Oct 27;32:e72 [PMID: 38487417]
  26. Animals (Basel). 2020 Oct 06;10(10): [PMID: 33036300]
  27. Front Vet Sci. 2022 Feb 08;8:808767 [PMID: 35211535]
  28. Animals (Basel). 2022 Oct 20;12(20): [PMID: 36290252]
  29. PLoS One. 2024 Jul 18;19(7):e0307061 [PMID: 39024229]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0animalwelfareanimalsChinastronggoodproductionrapidlylittleChineserelativelyinvolvementlegislationAttitudesgenderattitudestraditionsrespectmomentouschangesrecenthistorychangedsocietydramaticallyassumedalwaysFarmintensifiedcanreduceresourcesofferedparticularspacecomfortablelivingHoweveramongstworkersindustriesoptimismabilityneedimproveNeverthelessgrowingattentionsciencefocusedremotesensingtechnologicalapproachesgovernmentcurrentlysupportingstandardsalthoughplaceinfluencedmanyfactorsincludinglawageexperienceoccupationwomencaringfarmencouragingtendempathetictowardconcludedchangingsystemsmakedevelopmentimprovementfarmsespeciallyimportantDevelopmentsAnimalWelfarereligion

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.