Understanding Cancer Screening Behavior in South Korea: A Biopsychosocial Approach to Regional Differences.

Yoon-Hee Cho, Joohyun Lee
Author Information
  1. Yoon-Hee Cho: Department of Nursing, College of Nursing, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Republic of Korea. ORCID
  2. Joohyun Lee: Department of Nursing, College of Nursing, Eulji University, Seongnam 13135, Republic of Korea. ORCID

Abstract

This study aimed to examine regional cancer screening participation rates among South Korean adults aged 40 and over and to identify biological, psychological, and sociocultural factors associated with cancer screening behavior using the biopsychosocial model. This research was a secondary analysis study. Data were obtained from the 2023 Korean Community Health Survey, focusing on adults residing in cities that exhibited the highest and lowest rates of cancer screening. Differences in cancer screening rates by city were visualized using a location-based open service platform. Variables were categorized into biological, psychological, and sociocultural factors, and logistic regression analysis was conducted to ascertain the factors associated with screening participation. The cancer screening rate for adults aged 40 or older in 17 metropolitan cities in Korea ranged from 64.9% to 76.0%, and the national average was 70.9%. In the city with the highest screening rate, participation was positively associated with oral health, physical activity, breakfast-eating habits, and past smoking. In the city with the lowest screening rate, higher screening participation correlated with family cohabitation and satisfaction with the social environment. Our results suggest that cancer screening participation rates vary across regions and that the factors associated with cancer screening participation differ between regions with the highest and lowest participation rates. These results provide evidence for targeted interventions that take into account regional factors to improve cancer screening rates in South Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. Ann Fam Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;2(5):481-7 [PMID: 15506585]
  2. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):229-263 [PMID: 38572751]
  3. Brain Behav. 2025 Jan;15(1):e70230 [PMID: 39740784]
  4. J Occup Health. 2012;54(6):452-8 [PMID: 23060030]
  5. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 14;17(4): [PMID: 32075173]
  6. J Korean Med Sci. 2013 Mar;28(3):348-56 [PMID: 23487573]
  7. JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Jun 1;184(6):671-679 [PMID: 38683574]
  8. Lung Cancer. 2020 Aug;146:134-144 [PMID: 32535225]
  9. Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;195(1):3-4 [PMID: 19567886]
  10. Popul Health Manag. 2013 Jun;16(3):178-89 [PMID: 23405879]
  11. Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241285492 [PMID: 39318023]
  12. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 16;16(22): [PMID: 31744058]
  13. Prev Med Rep. 2015 Jun 24;2:559-62 [PMID: 26844118]
  14. J Cancer Res Ther. 2017 Apr-Jun;13(2):318-323 [PMID: 28643754]
  15. Am J Health Promot. 2009 Jan-Feb;23(3):168-75 [PMID: 19149421]
  16. Cancer. 2022 Dec 1;128(23):4041-4046 [PMID: 36239011]
  17. Epidemiol Health. 2018 Mar 29;40:e2018011 [PMID: 29642655]
  18. Am J Psychiatry. 1980 May;137(5):535-44 [PMID: 7369396]
  19. Cancer Med. 2012 Dec;1(3):350-6 [PMID: 23342284]
  20. Ethn Dis. 2003 Summer;13(3):376-86 [PMID: 12894963]
  21. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Feb;91(13 Suppl 1):S173-80 [PMID: 22193327]
  22. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008 Jan-Feb;37(1):51-7 [PMID: 18226157]
  23. Eur J Cancer. 2023 Sep;190:112942 [PMID: 37406529]
  24. Am J Prev Med. 1999 Jul;17(1):8-17 [PMID: 10429747]
  25. Gut. 2019 Aug;68(8):1450-1457 [PMID: 30377193]
  26. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Aug;32(8):1117-1124 [PMID: 28501944]
  27. Health Policy. 2019 Apr;123(4):360-366 [PMID: 30691696]
  28. J Prev Med Public Health. 2022 Mar;55(2):153-163 [PMID: 35391527]
  29. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2009 May-Jun;15(3):200-9 [PMID: 19363399]
  30. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2015;:57-65 [PMID: 25993143]
  31. Cancer. 2021 Aug 15;127(16):3029-3030 [PMID: 34086348]
  32. Am J Mens Health. 2018 Jul;12(4):837-843 [PMID: 27118456]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0screeningcancerparticipationratesfactorsassociatedSouthadultshighestlowestcityratestudyregionalKoreanaged40biologicalpsychologicalsocioculturalusingbiopsychosocialmodelanalysiscitiesDifferencesKorea9%resultsregionsaimedexamineamongidentifybehaviorresearchsecondaryDataobtained2023CommunityHealthSurveyfocusingresidingexhibitedvisualizedlocation-basedopenserviceplatformVariablescategorizedlogisticregressionconductedascertainolder17metropolitanranged64760%nationalaverage70positivelyoralhealthphysicalactivitybreakfast-eatinghabitspastsmokinghighercorrelatedfamilycohabitationsatisfactionsocialenvironmentsuggestvaryacrossdifferprovideevidencetargetedinterventionstakeaccountimproveUnderstandingCancerScreeningBehaviorKorea:BiopsychosocialApproachRegionalKCHSdatapredictors

Similar Articles

Cited By