Democratising clinical trials research to strengthen primary health care.

Christopher C Butler, Robert Mash, Nina Gobat, Paul Little, Mpundu Makasa, Martha Makwero, Edward J Mills, Regina Wing-Shan Sit, Max O Bachmann
Author Information
  1. Christopher C Butler: Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: christopher.butler@phc.ox.ac.uk.
  2. Robert Mash: Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
  3. Nina Gobat: Community Readiness and Resilience Unit, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
  4. Paul Little: Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  5. Mpundu Makasa: Department of Community and Family Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
  6. Martha Makwero: Department of Family Medicine, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
  7. Edward J Mills: Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
  8. Regina Wing-Shan Sit: The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
  9. Max O Bachmann: Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Abstract

The World Health Assembly has called for clinical trials to be strengthened, with broader demographic and geographical inclusion of populations. The objective of this paper is to highlight the importance of rigorous evidence to maximise the health gains of primary health care, and to identify strategies for strengthening clinical trials in primary care. Clinical trials should evaluate interventions of all kinds, including preventive manoeuvres, diagnostics, health service research questions, behavioural and educational interventions, vaccines, therapeutics, and policies. Single question trials can be inefficient and seldom strengthen health systems. New approaches that develop or strengthen health research infrastructure and embed research in primary care will identify effective interventions faster, how to deliver them better, and more accurately determine to whom they should be applied. When patients and community members, together with researchers, contribute to conception, design, and delivery, research will result in more useful, relevant evidence. Traditional site-based recruitment (where the participant comes to the trial) can be complemented by approaches that give people the opportunity to contribute regardless of where they live and receive their health care (taking the trials to the people). However, this cannot be done until regulation is modernised to make it easier for health-care professionals, researchers, and research participants to co-design, deliver, and implement such trials, and to develop processes to coordinate and monitor progress against goals for budget shifts, delivery, engagement, trials activity, and impact. Strengthening primary care trials is especially important in those regions where primary care is most under-resourced and is key to pandemic preparedness. Not doing so risks widening inequities further.

References

  1. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2024 Jul 23;16(1):e1-e2 [PMID: 39099265]
  2. Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457-502 [PMID: 16202000]
  3. Lancet. 2020 Jan 4;395(10217):42-52 [PMID: 31839279]
  4. JAMA. 2005 Jun 22;293(24):3029-35 [PMID: 15972565]
  5. Eur J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec;30(1):2293702 [PMID: 38180050]
  6. BMJ. 2012 Feb 07;344:e55 [PMID: 22315246]
  7. Lancet. 2018 Oct 20;392(10156):1371-1372 [PMID: 30343843]
  8. Wellcome Open Res. 2023 May 2;8:194 [PMID: 37654739]
  9. N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4;375(5):454-63 [PMID: 27518663]
  10. BMC Womens Health. 2023 Dec 13;23(1):667 [PMID: 38093242]
  11. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022 Apr 29;10(2): [PMID: 35487542]
  12. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 May;22(5):e153-e158 [PMID: 34951954]
  13. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Sep 14;3(9):e0002341 [PMID: 37708149]
  14. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 19;6:CD000245 [PMID: 28626858]
  15. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2018 Nov 29;10(1):e1-e2 [PMID: 30551714]
  16. J Intensive Care. 2021 Apr 14;9(1):34 [PMID: 33853684]
  17. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2011 Jun;25(2):359-67 [PMID: 21628051]
  18. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):464-75 [PMID: 19348971]
  19. Trials. 2022 Jan 28;23(1):81 [PMID: 35090533]
  20. Fam Med Community Health. 2024 Aug 3;12(3): [PMID: 39097405]
  21. BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Aug 16;4(Suppl 8):e001482 [PMID: 31497316]
  22. Trials. 2024 Apr 25;25(1):278 [PMID: 38659031]
  23. F1000Res. 2019 Jan 3;8:5 [PMID: 31354941]
  24. J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Jan;177:111610 [PMID: 39528004]
  25. BMJ. 1991 Jun 8;302(6789):1380-2 [PMID: 2059720]
  26. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2024 Feb 13;16(1):e1-e8 [PMID: 38426783]
  27. BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Jul 27;12:78 [PMID: 21794112]
  28. Lancet. 1971 Feb 27;1(7696):405-12 [PMID: 4100731]
  29. Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 23;15(1):1652 [PMID: 38396069]
  30. Lancet. 2023 Jan 28;401(10373):281-293 [PMID: 36566761]
  31. Fam Community Health. 2016 Jan-Mar;39(1):53-61 [PMID: 26605955]
  32. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 25;16(1):67 [PMID: 30045731]
  33. Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Jul 25;74(745):e570-e579 [PMID: 38228357]
  34. Lancet. 2012 Sep 8;380(9845):889-98 [PMID: 22901955]
  35. S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2020 Nov 05;62(1):e1-e4 [PMID: 33179955]
  36. BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 7;13(8):e069176 [PMID: 37550022]
  37. Med Care Res Rev. 2012 Apr;69(2):123-57 [PMID: 22203646]
  38. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019 Oct;18(10):797-807 [PMID: 31462747]
  39. Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Nov 1;98(11):812-814 [PMID: 33177779]
  40. Lancet. 2021 Jun 12;397(10291):2251-2252 [PMID: 34119064]
  41. Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Jun;68(671):294-295 [PMID: 29853596]
  42. BMC Med. 2020 May 18;18(1):133 [PMID: 32418543]
  43. BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 18;11(6):e046799 [PMID: 34145016]
  44. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Aug;88:7-13 [PMID: 28549929]
  45. Lancet Glob Health. 2021 May;9(5):e701-e710 [PMID: 33865475]
  46. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Sep;125:1-8 [PMID: 32416336]
  47. N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 5;383(19):e108 [PMID: 32966715]
  48. Clin Trials. 2016 Jun;13(3):358-66 [PMID: 26908536]
  49. Adv Biol Regul. 2022 Dec;86:100901 [PMID: 35915043]
  50. Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Jul;47(420):449-52 [PMID: 9281875]
  51. Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Dec 28;74(738):e9-e16 [PMID: 38154946]
  52. BMJ. 2020 Jan 21;368:l6228 [PMID: 31964628]

MeSH Term

Humans
Primary Health Care
Clinical Trials as Topic
Biomedical Research

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0trialshealthcareprimaryresearchclinicalinterventionsstrengthenevidenceidentifycanapproachesdevelopwilldeliverresearcherscontributedeliverypeopleWorldHealthAssemblycalledstrengthenedbroaderdemographicgeographicalinclusionpopulationsobjectivepaperhighlightimportancerigorousmaximisegainsstrategiesstrengtheningClinicalevaluatekindsincludingpreventivemanoeuvresdiagnosticsservicequestionsbehaviouraleducationalvaccinestherapeuticspoliciesSinglequestioninefficientseldomsystemsNewinfrastructureembedeffectivefasterbetteraccuratelydetermineappliedpatientscommunitymemberstogetherconceptiondesignresultusefulrelevantTraditionalsite-basedrecruitmentparticipantcomestrialcomplementedgiveopportunityregardlesslivereceivetakingHoweverdoneregulationmodernisedmakeeasierhealth-careprofessionalsparticipantsco-designimplementprocessescoordinatemonitorprogressgoalsbudgetshiftsengagementactivityimpactStrengtheningespeciallyimportantregionsunder-resourcedkeypandemicpreparednessriskswideninginequitiesfurtherDemocratising

Similar Articles

Cited By