The prognostic significance of semi-quantitative metabolic parameters and tumoral metabolic activity based on I-MIBG SPECT/CT in pretreatment neuroblastoma patients.

Ziang Zhou, Xu Yang, Guanyun Wang, Xiaoya Wang, Jun Liu, Yanfeng Xu, Kan Ying, Wei Wang, Jigang Yang
Author Information
  1. Ziang Zhou: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong An Road, Xi Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
  2. Xu Yang: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong An Road, Xi Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
  3. Guanyun Wang: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong An Road, Xi Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
  4. Xiaoya Wang: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong An Road, Xi Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
  5. Jun Liu: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong An Road, Xi Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
  6. Yanfeng Xu: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong An Road, Xi Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
  7. Kan Ying: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong An Road, Xi Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
  8. Wei Wang: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong An Road, Xi Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
  9. Jigang Yang: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong An Road, Xi Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China. yangjigang@ccmu.edu.cn.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the prognosis predictive value of semi-quantitative metabolic parameters and tumoral metabolic activity based on I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) SPECT/CT in pretreatment neuroblastoma (NB) patients.
METHODS: A total of 50 children (25 girls, 25 boys, median age 37 months, range 1-102 months) with newly diagnosed NB, consecutively examined with pretherapeutic I-MIBG SPECT/CT between 2018 and 2024, were included in this retrospective study. The semi-quantitative metabolic parameters and activity of primary tumor were measured, including Tmax/Lmax, Tmean/Lmean, Tmax/Lmean, Tmax/Mmax, Tmean/Mmean and asphericity (ASP). The ratio was maximum or mean count of primary tumor, liver and muscle. Clinical data and image-related factors was recorded as well. The outcome endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Independent predictors were identified through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Kaplan Meier analysis with log-rank test for EFS were performed.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 42 months (range 2.5-74 months; 4 patients showed disease progression/relapse, 7 patients died). The univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that bone/bone marrow metastasis [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.051, 18.570, p = 0.043], Tmax/Lmax (95% CI: 1.074, 1.459, p = 0.004) and ASP (95% CI: 2.618, 273.477, p = 0.006) were independent predictors of EFS. The Kaplan Meier survival analyses demonstrated that Tmax/Lmax undefined[Formula: see text]]]>6 and ASP [Formula: see text]undefined]]>34% and with bone/bone marrow metastasis had worse outcomes.
CONCLUSION: In this exploratory study, pretherapeutic I-MIBG image-derived semi-quantitative metabolic parameters and tumor asphericity provided prognostic value for EFS in NB patients. Tmax/Lmax [Formula: see text]undefined]]>6 and ASP [Formula: see text]undefined]]>34%, along with the presence of bone/bone marrow metastasis, could be considered as supplementary factors alongside existing ones.

Keywords

References

  1. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1999 May-Jun;21(3):181-9 [PMID: 10363850]
  2. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Oct;45(11):2009-2024 [PMID: 29938300]
  3. Eur J Pediatr. 2023 May;182(5):2189-2196 [PMID: 36856889]
  4. BMC Cancer. 2014 Dec 01;14:896 [PMID: 25444154]
  5. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2024 Aug;22(6):413-433 [PMID: 39151455]
  6. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Dec;44(13):2203-2212 [PMID: 28808732]
  7. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Nov 20;29(33):4358-64 [PMID: 21969516]
  8. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006 Dec;47(7):865-74 [PMID: 16444675]
  9. Eur Radiol. 2014 Sep;24(9):2077-87 [PMID: 24965509]
  10. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022 Nov;69(11):e29849 [PMID: 35727712]
  11. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Mar;42(3):429-37 [PMID: 25416633]
  12. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Oct 10;39(29):3229-3241 [PMID: 34319759]
  13. Br J Cancer. 2010 Apr 27;102(9):1319-26 [PMID: 20424613]
  14. Mol Imaging Biol. 2017 Jun;19(3):437-445 [PMID: 27743210]
  15. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2024 Aug;22(6): [PMID: 39151453]
  16. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Feb;44(2):234-241 [PMID: 27663238]
  17. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Mar 11;41(1):92 [PMID: 35277192]
  18. Med Image Anal. 2016 Oct;33:176-180 [PMID: 27498015]
  19. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar 1;31(7):944-51 [PMID: 23341514]
  20. Ann Nucl Med. 2021 May;35(5):549-556 [PMID: 33586098]
  21. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010 Dec;37(12):2436-46 [PMID: 20644928]
  22. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Oct 1;22(19):3909-15 [PMID: 15459212]
  23. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Oct;40(11):1701-10 [PMID: 23857458]
  24. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003 May;30(5):B45-50 [PMID: 12658506]
  25. Cancer Imaging. 2022 Jul 5;22(1):32 [PMID: 35791003]
  26. Eur J Cancer. 1995;31A(2):256-61 [PMID: 7718334]
  27. Nat Genet. 2023 Jun;55(6):1022-1033 [PMID: 37169874]
  28. Nat Genet. 2023 Apr;55(4):619-630 [PMID: 36973454]
  29. World J Pediatr. 2019 Dec;15(6):572-579 [PMID: 31342464]
  30. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug;19(8):515-533 [PMID: 35614230]
  31. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Aug;44(8):1251-1253 [PMID: 28258443]

Grants

  1. 7232031/Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality
  2. 7232031/Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality
  3. 7232031/Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality
  4. 7232031/Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality
  5. 7232031/Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality
  6. 7232031/Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality
  7. 7232031/Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality
  8. 7232031/Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality
  9. 7232031/Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality
  10. 20230484470/Beijing Nova Program
  11. 20230484470/Beijing Nova Program
  12. 20230484470/Beijing Nova Program
  13. 20230484470/Beijing Nova Program
  14. 20230484470/Beijing Nova Program
  15. 20230484470/Beijing Nova Program
  16. 20230484470/Beijing Nova Program
  17. 20230484470/Beijing Nova Program
  18. 20230484470/Beijing Nova Program
  19. 82272034/National Natural Science Foundation of China
  20. 82272034/National Natural Science Foundation of China
  21. 82272034/National Natural Science Foundation of China
  22. 82272034/National Natural Science Foundation of China
  23. 82272034/National Natural Science Foundation of China
  24. 82272034/National Natural Science Foundation of China
  25. 82272034/National Natural Science Foundation of China
  26. 82272034/National Natural Science Foundation of China
  27. 82272034/National Natural Science Foundation of China

MeSH Term

Humans
Neuroblastoma
Male
Female
3-Iodobenzylguanidine
Prognosis
Child, Preschool
Retrospective Studies
Infant
Child
Radiopharmaceuticals
Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed Tomography

Chemicals

3-Iodobenzylguanidine
Radiopharmaceuticals

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0metabolicpatientssemi-quantitativeparametersmonthsTmax/LmaxASPEFSseeactivitySPECT/CTNBI-MIBGtumorbone/bonemarrowmetastasis1p = 0[Formula:valuetumoralbasedpretreatmentneuroblastoma25rangepretherapeuticstudyprimaryasphericityfactorssurvivalpredictorsunivariatemultivariateregressionanalysesKaplanMeieranalysis2demonstrated95%CI:text]undefined]]>34%prognosticPURPOSE:assessprognosispredictiveI-meta-iodobenzylguanidineMIBGMETHODS:total50childrengirlsboysmedianage371-102newlydiagnosedconsecutivelyexamined20182024includedretrospectivemeasuredincludingTmean/LmeanTmax/LmeanTmax/MmaxTmean/MmeanratiomaximummeancountlivermuscleClinicaldataimage-relatedrecordedwelloutcomeendpointevent-freeIndependentidentifiedlogisticReceiveroperatingcharacteristicROClog-ranktestperformedRESULTS:Medianfollow-up425-744showeddiseaseprogression/relapse7diedCox[95%confidenceintervalCI:05118570043]074459004618273477006independentundefined[Formula:text]]]>6worseoutcomesCONCLUSION:exploratoryimage-derivedprovidedtext]undefined]]>6alongpresenceconsideredsupplementaryalongsideexistingonessignificance123I-MIBGAsphericityNeuroblastomaPrognosisSemi-quantitative

Similar Articles

Cited By