Sinicization and validation of occupational burnout scale for nurses in operating room.

Yufang Li, Qiaoyan Liu, Yun Jiang, Deyun Cheng, Wei Yin
Author Information
  1. Yufang Li: Department of Nursing, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
  2. Qiaoyan Liu: Department of Nursing, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
  3. Yun Jiang: Nursing Department, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing, Anhui, China.
  4. Deyun Cheng: Nursing Department, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing, Anhui, China.
  5. Wei Yin: Department of Nursing, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate a burnout scale specifically developed for operating room nurses.
Methods: The Brislin translation model was utilized to translate and back-translate the scale. Following cultural adaptation and a preliminary investigation, the Chinese version of the Operating Room Nurse Burnout Scale was finalized. A convenience sampling method was employed to select 445 operating room nurses in Anhui Province as research participants to evaluate the scale's reliability and validity.
Results: The Chinese version of the Operating Room Nurse Burnout Scale consists of 33 items, categorized into four dimensions: personal factors, occupational nature factors, interpersonal relationship factors, and organizational factors. The item-level content validity index (I-CVI) was 0.849, and the scale-level content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) indicated good content validity. Exploratory factor analysis yielded a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value of 0.968, while Bartlett's test of sphericity demonstrated a chi-square value of 11,288 ( < 0.01). Four common factors were extracted, accounting for a cumulative variance contribution of 65.9%. The overall Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.968, the split-half Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.925, and the test-retest Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.974.
Conclusion: The Chinese version of the Nurse Burnout Scale demonstrates robust reliability and validity, making it suitable for assessing burnout levels among operating room nurses.

Keywords

References

  1. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2012 Feb;37(2):152-5 [PMID: 22561427]
  2. Hum Resour Health. 2020 Jun 5;18(1):41 [PMID: 32503559]
  3. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Oct;67(10):2065-2071 [PMID: 31334567]
  4. Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 11;13:947189 [PMID: 36033007]
  5. Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 8;14(1):8216 [PMID: 38589442]
  6. Med Teach. 2017 Feb;39(2):160-163 [PMID: 27841065]
  7. J Psychiatr Res. 2020 Apr;123:9-20 [PMID: 32007680]
  8. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2443059 [PMID: 39499515]
  9. Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 30;11:1133484 [PMID: 37064688]
  10. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 04;19(3): [PMID: 35162802]

MeSH Term

Humans
Burnout, Professional
Female
Adult
Reproducibility of Results
Male
Surveys and Questionnaires
China
Operating Rooms
Psychometrics
Middle Aged
Operating Room Nursing
Nursing Staff, Hospital
Translations

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0validity0operatingroomfactorsburnoutscalenursesChineseversionNurseBurnoutScalereliabilitycontentCronbach'sαcoefficientevaluateOperatingRoomoccupationalindexvalue968Objective:studyaimsspecificallydevelopedMethods:Brislintranslationmodelutilizedtranslateback-translateFollowingculturaladaptationpreliminaryinvestigationfinalizedconveniencesamplingmethodemployedselect445AnhuiProvinceresearchparticipantsscale'sResults:consists33itemscategorizedfourdimensions:personalnatureinterpersonalrelationshiporganizationalitem-levelI-CVI849scale-levelS-CVI/AveindicatedgoodExploratoryfactoranalysisyieldedKaiser-Meyer-OlkinKMOBartlett'stestsphericitydemonstratedchi-square11288<01Fourcommonextractedaccountingcumulativevariancecontribution659%overallsplit-half925test-retest974Conclusion:demonstratesrobustmakingsuitableassessinglevelsamongSinicizationvalidationjobnurse

Similar Articles

Cited By