Study on the Current Situation and Influencing Factors of Family Resilience of Patients With Recurrent Cancer and Their Caregivers.

Yaoyao Pei, Zhangying Xu, Xingjuan Luo, Feng Wu, Mei Yu, Wei Xiao, Tingting Hu
Author Information
  1. Yaoyao Pei: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  2. Zhangying Xu: Department of Oncology, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, Hubei, China.
  3. Xingjuan Luo: School of Basic Medicine, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, Hubei, China.
  4. Feng Wu: Office of Academic Research, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, Hubei, China.
  5. Mei Yu: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  6. Wei Xiao: Department of Nursing, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  7. Tingting Hu: Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Occupational Hazard Identificaand Control, School of Medicine, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China. ORCID

Abstract

AIM: Family resilience plays a crucial role in cancer recurrence patients and their caregivers. However, there are few studies that have studied the family resilience of patients with recurrent cancer and their caregivers at the same time. Guided by the framework of family resilience, this study explored the status, influencing factors and interactions of family resilience between patients with recurrent cancer and their caregivers.
DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study.
METHOD: Selecting 204 patients with recurrent tumors and their caregivers from October to November 2023 as the study subjects, and the actor-partner interdependence model of the family resilience of patients with recurrent tumors and their caregivers was established to analyze the current status, influencing factors and interactions of the family resilience of patients and caregivers.
RESULT: There was a significant correlation between the level of family resilience with the level of perceived social support, the level of Herth's hope, the level of patients' self-perceived burden and the level of burden on the caregiver. The actor-partner interdependence model revealed the direct impact of the patients' and caregivers' social support and hope level on their own family resilience. The indirect effect of the caregivers' social support on the patients' family resilience, in which the caregivers' hope level plays a significant mediating role.
CONCLUSION: The family resilience of patients with recurrent cancer and their caregivers is affected by the level of social support and hope. In order to help patients and caregivers better cope with the disease, it is recommended that clinical medical staff pay attention to improving the social support and hope level of disease treatment of patients and caregivers, and regard the two as a community, and explore intervention programs focusing on improving family resilience.

Keywords

References

  1. Curr Opin Psychol. 2023 Feb;49:101506 [PMID: 36493525]
  2. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2020 Jan - Feb;86:103952 [PMID: 31542631]
  3. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76 [PMID: 8433390]
  4. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Mar;28(2):e12984 [PMID: 30628124]
  5. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):1509 [PMID: 39702208]
  6. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 May;25(5):1329-1339 [PMID: 29468606]
  7. Nat Commun. 2022 Aug 25;13(1):4975 [PMID: 36008376]
  8. Chin Med J (Engl). 2022 Feb 9;135(5):584-590 [PMID: 35143424]
  9. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Sep;110(3):998-1005 [PMID: 32353436]
  10. Med Care. 2003 Jan;41(1):110-8 [PMID: 12544548]
  11. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012 Jan-Feb;54(1):140-5 [PMID: 21555158]
  12. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022 Jun 2;21(4):366-373 [PMID: 34661635]
  13. J Child Fam Stud. 2023 Jun;32(6):1789-1804 [PMID: 39371601]
  14. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2020 Aug;37(8):648-658 [PMID: 31830813]
  15. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Nov;14(12):1208-15 [PMID: 24120480]
  16. J Fam Psychol. 2010 Jun;24(3):359-66 [PMID: 20545409]
  17. Eur J Cancer. 1995 Dec;31A(13-14):2260-3 [PMID: 8652253]
  18. Palliat Support Care. 2018 Jun;16(3):269-277 [PMID: 28464972]
  19. Aggress Behav. 2017 Jul;43(4):329-341 [PMID: 27918082]
  20. J Adv Nurs. 1992 Oct;17(10):1251-9 [PMID: 1430629]
  21. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2018 Mar;20(1):13-22 [PMID: 29946207]
  22. Heliyon. 2024 Feb 29;10(5):e27351 [PMID: 38463805]
  23. Front Psychol. 2018 May 08;9:666 [PMID: 29867644]
  24. Multivariate Behav Res. 1990 Apr 1;25(2):173-80 [PMID: 26794479]
  25. Am J Occup Ther. 2025 Jan 1;79(1): [PMID: 39661631]
  26. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249 [PMID: 33538338]
  27. Support Care Cancer. 2023 Feb 21;31(3):177 [PMID: 36802242]
  28. Struct Equ Modeling. 2020;27(2):318-329 [PMID: 32774078]
  29. Palliat Med. 2006 Dec;20(8):755-67 [PMID: 17148530]
  30. Psychooncology. 2018 Apr;27(4):1284-1290 [PMID: 29441696]
  31. Cancer Nurs. 2007 Sep-Oct;30(5):405-11 [PMID: 17876187]
  32. PLoS One. 2022 Nov 16;17(11):e0274756 [PMID: 36383518]
  33. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 20;20(3): [PMID: 36767295]
  34. Curr Psychol. 2022 Dec 26;:1-15 [PMID: 36590009]
  35. Support Care Cancer. 2021 Nov;29(11):6913-6920 [PMID: 34031751]
  36. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2013 Sep;16(3):294-310 [PMID: 23797387]
  37. Clin Rehabil. 2016 Aug;30(8):811-31 [PMID: 26330297]
  38. Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 16;12:625654 [PMID: 34335354]
  39. Infant Behav Dev. 2019 Nov;57:101351 [PMID: 31445430]
  40. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Feb 19;18(1):33 [PMID: 32075647]
  41. Psychooncology. 2015 Dec;24(12):1605-17 [PMID: 26059915]
  42. Gerontologist. 1986 Jun;26(3):260-6 [PMID: 3721233]
  43. Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 31;7(1):134 [PMID: 30170619]
  44. Clin Gerontol. 2022 May-Jun;45(3):525-537 [PMID: 32065071]
  45. BMC Psychol. 2024 Dec 22;12(1):773 [PMID: 39710785]
  46. BMC Res Notes. 2020 Mar 2;13(1):120 [PMID: 32122404]

Grants

  1. /Hubei Provincial Central Guidance Local Science and Technology Development Project

MeSH Term

Humans
Caregivers
Cross-Sectional Studies
Resilience, Psychological
Female
Male
Middle Aged
Social Support
Adult
Neoplasms
Aged
Surveys and Questionnaires
Family
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Adaptation, Psychological

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0resiliencefamilypatientscaregiverslevelrecurrentsocialsupporthopecancerstudyinterdependencemodelpatients'caregivers'Familyplaysrolestatusinfluencingfactorsinteractionstumorsactor-partnersignificantburdendiseaseimprovingAIM:crucialrecurrenceHoweverstudiesstudiedtimeGuidedframeworkexploredDESIGN:Observationalcross-sectionalMETHOD:Selecting204OctoberNovember2023subjectsestablishedanalyzecurrentRESULT:correlationperceivedHerth'sself-perceivedcaregiverrevealeddirectimpactindirecteffectmediatingCONCLUSION:affectedorderhelpbettercoperecommendedclinicalmedicalstaffpayattentiontreatmentregardtwocommunityexploreinterventionprogramsfocusingStudyCurrentSituationInfluencingFactorsResiliencePatientsRecurrentCancerCaregiversactor‐partnertumour

Similar Articles

Cited By