OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search

Journal

Publication Year

1 year 3 years 5 years 10 years
2021 - 2032
202120222023
202420252026
202720282029
203020312032
2021 - 2032
202120222023
202420252026
202720282029
203020312032

Publication Type

Associated Data

Found 73,468 results

Filters: reinforcement

Parametric manipulation of interresponse-time contingency independent of reinforcement rate.
G Galbicka, J R Platt
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. Oct, 1986.12(4):371-80 Print
Source:PubMed
PMID: 3772301 doi:
INTRACRANIAL REINFORCEMENT COMPARED WITH SUGAR-WATER REINFORCEMENT.
W E GIBSON, L D REID, M SAKAI, P B PORTER
Science. Jun 04, 1965.148(3675):1357-9 Print
Source:PubMed
PMID: 14281726 doi:10.1126/science.148.3675.1357
Reinforcement rate and interresponse time differentiation.
D O Kuch, J R Platt
J Exp Anal Behav. Nov, 1976.26(3):471-86 Print
Source:PubMed
PMID: 16811962 doi:10.1901/jeab.1976.26-471
Dissociating the determinants of self-stimulation.
D M Atrens, J D Sinden, G E Hunt
Physiol Behav. Dec, 1983.31(6):787-99 Print
Source:PubMed
PMID: 6665069 doi:10.1016/0031-9384(83)90275-5
Reinforcement delay of one second severely impairs acquisition of brain self-stimulation.
J Black, J D Belluzzi, L Stein
Brain Res. Dec 16, 1985.359(1-2):113-9 Print
Source:PubMed
PMID: 4075139 doi:10.1016/0006-8993(85)91418-0
Partial reinforcement, continuous reinforcement, and reinforcement shift effects.
S H HULSE
J Exp Psychol. Nov, 1962.64:451-9 Print
Source:PubMed
PMID: 13955649 doi:10.1037/h0044554
Auditory localization of infants as a function of reinforcement conditions.
J M Moore, G Thompson, M Thompson
J Speech Hear Disord. Feb, 1975.40(1):29-34 Print
Source:PubMed
PMID: 1123925 doi:10.1044/jshd.4001.29
Perseveration of the partial reinforcement effect in extinction with rats over two phases of extinction and two stages of continuous reinforcement.
Richard S Calef, Michael C Choban, Katherine R Glenney, Ruth A Calef, Erik Schmitt, Sarah Hinte, Megan Clegg, Joseph E Kraynok, Sallie D Richards
Psychol Rep. Feb, 2007.100(1):101-7 Print
Source:PubMed
PMID: 17451011 doi:10.2466/pr0.100.1.101-107
Pigeon's choice depends primarily on the value of the signal for the outcome rather than its frequency or contrast.
Thomas R Zentall, Daniel N Peng, Peyton M Mueller
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. Apr, 2022.48(2):135-144 Print
Source:PubMed
PMID: 35533106 doi:10.1037/xan0000316
Contrast between what is expected and what occurs increases pigeon's suboptimal choice.
Thomas R Zentall, Danielle M Andrews, Jacob P Case
Anim Cogn. Jan, 2019.22(1):81-87 Print-Electronic
Source:PubMed
PMID: 30430348 doi:10.1007/s10071-018-1223-x
0