Database Commons
Database Commons

a catalog of worldwide biological databases

Database Profile

Wildlife Trade

General information

URL: http://www.healthmap.org/wildlifetrade
Full name:
Description: Wildlife Trade provides a customizable visualization of worldwide reports on interceptions of illegally traded wildlife and wildlife products.
Year founded: 2012
Last update:
Version:
Accessibility:
Accessible
Country/Region: United States

Classification & Tag

Data type:
Data object:
Database category:
Major species:
Keywords:

Contact information

University/Institution: Harvard-Massachusetts Institute of Technology Division of Health Sciences and Technology
Address:
City: Boston
Province/State: Massachusetts
Country/Region: United States
Contact name (PI/Team): Amy L. Sonricker Hansen
Contact email (PI/Helpdesk): amy.hansen@childrens.harvard.edu

Publications

23236444
Digital surveillance: a novel approach to monitoring the illegal wildlife trade. [PMID: 23236444]
Sonricker Hansen AL, Li A, Joly D, Mekaru S, Brownstein JS.

A dearth of information obscures the true scale of the global illegal trade in wildlife. Herein, we introduce an automated web crawling surveillance system developed to monitor reports on illegally traded wildlife. A resource for enforcement officials as well as the general public, the freely available website, http://www.healthmap.org/wildlifetrade, provides a customizable visualization of worldwide reports on interceptions of illegally traded wildlife and wildlife products. From August 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011, publicly available English language illegal wildlife trade reports from official and unofficial sources were collected and categorized by location and species involved. During this interval, 858 illegal wildlife trade reports were collected from 89 countries. Countries with the highest number of reports included India (n = 146, 15.6%), the United States (n = 143, 15.3%), South Africa (n = 75, 8.0%), China (n = 41, 4.4%), and Vietnam (n = 37, 4.0%). Species reported as traded or poached included elephants (n = 107, 12.5%), rhinoceros (n = 103, 12.0%), tigers (n = 68, 7.9%), leopards (n = 54, 6.3%), and pangolins (n = 45, 5.2%). The use of unofficial data sources, such as online news sites and social networks, to collect information on international wildlife trade augments traditional approaches drawing on official reporting and presents a novel source of intelligence with which to monitor and collect news in support of enforcement against this threat to wildlife conservation worldwide.

PLoS One. 2012:7(12) | 19 Citations (from Europe PMC, 2025-12-13)

Ranking

All databases:
4830/6895 (29.964%)
Metadata:
492/719 (31.711%)
4830
Total Rank
17
Citations
1.308
z-index

Community reviews

Not Rated
Data quality & quantity:
Content organization & presentation
System accessibility & reliability:

Word cloud

Related Databases

Citing
Cited by

Record metadata

Created on: 2018-01-28
Curated by:
Pei Wang [2018-03-11]
Hao Zhang [2018-01-28]