Some neurolinguistic implications of prearticulatory editing in production.

S M Garnsey, G S Dell
Author Information

Abstract

This paper argues that a complete model of language production must include a prearticulatory editing component. The function of this component is to monitor planned speech for deviations from the speaker's intention and repair any deviations that are found. It is claimed that adding such an editing component onto a production model fundamentally changes any account of aphasic symptoms using that model. As a case in point it is shown that E. M. Saffran's (1982, British Journal of Psychology, 73, 317-337) argument that agrammatic Broca's aphasia involves a deficit at the functional level of M. F. Garrett's (1975, in G. H. Bower (Ed.). The psychology of learning and motivation, New York: Academic Press) production model is no longer sound when prearticulatory editing processes are considered.

Grants

  1. MH33560/NIMH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Aphasia
Brain
Humans
Phonetics
Semantics
Speech
Speech Production Measurement

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0modelproductioneditingprearticulatorycomponentdeviationsMpaperarguescompletelanguagemustincludefunctionmonitorplannedspeechspeaker'sintentionrepairfoundclaimedaddingontofundamentallychangesaccountaphasicsymptomsusingcasepointshownESaffran's1982BritishJournalPsychology73317-337argumentagrammaticBroca'saphasiainvolvesdeficitfunctionallevelFGarrett's1975GHBowerEdpsychologylearningmotivationNewYork:AcademicPresslongersoundprocessesconsideredneurolinguisticimplications

Similar Articles

Cited By