Intraindividual differences in motivation and cognition in students with and without learning disabilities.

P R Pintrich, E M Anderman, C Klobucar
Author Information
  1. P R Pintrich: Combined Program in Education and Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Abstract

The present study examines several cognitive and motivational variables that distinguish children with learning disabilities (n = 19) from children without learning disabilities (n = 20). The total sample included 30 males and 9 females and was composed of white, fifth-grade students from a middle-class community in the Midwest. Results showed that although the students with learning disabilities displayed lower levels of metacognitive knowledge and reading comprehension, they did not differ from the students without learning disabilities on self-efficacy, intrinsic orientation, or anxiety. In addition, they did not show any signs of learned helplessness, although they did tend to attribute success and failure to external causes more often than the students without learning disabilities. Using a cluster analysis that grouped individuals, we found that differences in the motivational and cognitive variables cut across a priori categories of children with and without learning disabilities. Three clusters were formed: one with high comprehension, motivation, and metacognition (mostly children without learning disabilities); one with low levels of comprehension and metacognition but high intrinsic motivation (all children with learning disabilities); and one with low intrinsic motivation but average comprehension, metacognition, and attributional style (approximately equal numbers of children with and without learning disabilities). Implications for diagnosis and intervention for students with learning disabilities are discussed.

MeSH Term

Anxiety
Child
Cognition
Female
Humans
Learning Disabilities
Male
Motivation
Reading
Self-Assessment
Wechsler Scales

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0learningdisabilitieswithoutchildrenstudentscomprehensionmotivationintrinsiconemetacognitioncognitivemotivationalvariablesn=althoughlevelsdifferenceshighlowpresentstudyexaminesseveraldistinguish1920totalsampleincluded30males9femalescomposedwhitefifth-grademiddle-classcommunityMidwestResultsshoweddisplayedlowermetacognitiveknowledgereadingdifferself-efficacyorientationanxietyadditionshowsignslearnedhelplessnesstendattributesuccessfailureexternalcausesoftenUsingclusteranalysisgroupedindividualsfoundcutacrossprioricategoriesThreeclustersformed:mostlyaverageattributionalstyleapproximatelyequalnumbersImplicationsdiagnosisinterventiondiscussedIntraindividualcognition

Similar Articles

Cited By (4)