Graduate programs in health administration: faculty academic reputation and faculty research reputation by program location and program reputation.

M Nowicki
Author Information
  1. M Nowicki: Southwest Texas State University, San Marcos 78666, USA.

Abstract

This study used program location and program reputation to describe two important faculty characteristics: academic reputation and research reputation. The study involved 44 graduate programs in health administration representing four program locations: schools of public health, business, medicine/allied health, and graduate/independent. Fourteen programs were identified as ranked programs and the remaining 30 programs were identified as unranked programs. While the study identifies many differences, few are significant, thus adding credence to the argument for diversity in program location and diminishing credence in the argument for program reputation.

MeSH Term

Analysis of Variance
Education, Graduate
Faculty
Geography
Hospital Administration
Program Evaluation
Schools, Health Occupations
United States

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0programreputationprogramshealthstudylocationfacultyacademicresearchidentifiedcredenceargumentuseddescribetwoimportantcharacteristics:involved44graduateadministrationrepresentingfourlocations:schoolspublicbusinessmedicine/alliedgraduate/independentFourteenrankedremaining30unrankedidentifiesmanydifferencessignificantthusaddingdiversitydiminishingGraduateadministration:

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.