A sample size formula for the supremum log-rank statistic.

Kevin Hasegawa Eng, Michael R Kosorok
Author Information
  1. Kevin Hasegawa Eng: Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53792, USA.

Abstract

An advantage of the supremum log-rank over the standard log-rank statistic is an increased sensitivity to a wider variety of stochastic ordering alternatives. In this article, we develop a formula for sample size computation for studies utilizing the supremum log-rank statistic. The idea is to base power on the proportional hazards alternative, so that the supremum log rank will have the same power as the standard log rank in the setting where the standard log rank is optimal. This results in a slight increase in sample size over that required for the standard log rank. For example, a 5.733% increase occurs for a two-sided test having type I error 0.05 and power 0.80. This slight increase in sample size is offset by the significant gains in power the supremum log-rank test achieves for a wide range of nonproportional hazards alternatives. A small simulation study is used for illustration. These results should facilitate the wider use of the supremum log-rank statistic in clinical trials.

Grants

  1. T32 HL083806/NHLBI NIH HHS
  2. CA75142/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Biometry
Clinical Trials as Topic
Computer Simulation
Humans
Models, Statistical
Proportional Hazards Models
Sample Size
Survival Analysis

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0supremumlog-rankstandardstatisticsamplesizepowerlogrankincreasewideralternativesformulahazardsresultsslighttest0advantageincreasedsensitivityvarietystochasticorderingarticledevelopcomputationstudiesutilizingideabaseproportionalalternativewillsettingoptimalrequiredexample5733%occurstwo-sidedtypeerror0580offsetsignificantgainsachieveswiderangenonproportionalsmallsimulationstudyusedillustrationfacilitateuseclinicaltrials

Similar Articles

Cited By