Individual differences in brain activity during visuo-spatial processing assessed by slow cortical potentials and LORETA.

Claus Lamm, Florian Ph S Fischmeister, Herbert Bauer
Author Information
  1. Claus Lamm: Brain Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, A-1010 Vienna, Austria. claus.lamm@univie.ac.at

Abstract

Using slow-cortical potentials (SCPs), Vitouch et al. demonstrated that subjects with low ability to solve a complex visuo-spatial imagery task show higher activity in occipital, parietal and frontal cortex during task processing than subjects with high ability. This finding has been interpreted in the sense of the so-called "neural efficiency" hypothesis, which assumes that the central nervous system of individuals with higher intellectual abilities is functioning in a more efficient way than the one of individuals with lower abilities. Using a higher spatial resolution of SCP recordings, and by employing the source localization method of LORETA (low-resolution electromagnetic tomography), we investigated this hypothesis by performing an extended replication of Vitouch et al.'s study. SCPs during processing of a visuo-spatial imagery task were recorded in pre-selected subjects with either high or low abilities in solving the imagery task. Topographic and LORETA analyses of SCPs revealed that a distributed network of extrastriate occipital, superior parietal, temporal, medial frontal and prefrontal areas was active during task solving. This network is well in line with former studies of the functional neuroanatomy of visuo-spatial imagery. Contrary to our expectations, however, the results of Vitouch et al. as well as of other studies supporting the neural efficiency hypothesis could not be confirmed since no difference in brain activity between groups was observed. This inconsistency between studies might be due to differing task processing strategies. While subjects with high abilities in the Vitouch et al. study seemed to use a visuo-perceptual task solving approach, all other subjects relied upon a visuo-motor task processing strategy.

MeSH Term

Artifacts
Brain
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Electroencephalography
Evoked Potentials
Functional Laterality
Humans
Individuality
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Space Perception
Visual Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0tasksubjectsprocessingVitouchetalvisuo-spatialimageryabilitiesSCPshigheractivityhighhypothesisLORETAsolvingstudiesUsingpotentialslowabilityoccipitalparietalfrontalindividualsstudynetworkwellbrainslow-corticaldemonstratedsolvecomplexshowcortexfindinginterpretedsenseso-called"neuralefficiency"assumescentralnervoussystemintellectualfunctioningefficientwayonelowerspatialresolutionSCPrecordingsemployingsourcelocalizationmethodlow-resolutionelectromagnetictomographyinvestigatedperformingextendedreplication'srecordedpre-selectedeitherTopographicanalysesrevealeddistributedextrastriatesuperiortemporalmedialprefrontalareasactivelineformerfunctionalneuroanatomyContraryexpectationshoweverresultssupportingneuralefficiencyconfirmedsincedifferencegroupsobservedinconsistencymightduedifferingstrategiesseemedusevisuo-perceptualapproachrelieduponvisuo-motorstrategyIndividualdifferencesassessedslowcortical

Similar Articles

Cited By