A cytomolecular approach to assess the potential of gene transfer from a crop (Triticum turgidum L.) to a wild relative (Aegilops geniculata Roth.).

Marta Cifuentes, Melisande Blein, Elena Benavente
Author Information
  1. Marta Cifuentes: Departamento de Biotecnología (Genética), E. T. S. Ingenieros Agrónomos, Universidad Politécnica, 28040, Madrid, Spain, e.benavente@upm.es.

Abstract

When a crop hybridizes with a wild relative, the potential for stable transmission to the wild of any crop gene is directly related to the frequency of crop-wild homoeologous pairing for the chromosomal region where it is located within the crop genome. Pairing pattern at metaphase I (MI) has been examined in durum wheat x Aegilops geniculata interspecific hybrids (2n=4x=ABUgMg) by means of a genomic in-situ hybridization procedure that resulted in simultaneous discrimination of A, B and wild genomes. The level of MI pairing in the hybrids varied greatly depending on the crop genotype. However, their pattern of homoeologous association was very similar, with a frequency of wheat-wild association close to 60% in all genotype combinations. A-wild represented 80-85% of wheat-wild associations which supports that, on average, A genome sequences are much more likely to be transferred to this wild relative following interspecific hybridization and backcrossing. Combination of genomic DNA probes and the ribosomal pTa71 probe has allowed to determine the MI pairing behaviour of the major NOR-bearing chromosomes in these hybrids (1 B, 6B, 1 Ug and 5 Ug), in addition to wheat chromosome 4A which could be identified with the sole use of genomic probes. The MI pairing pattern of the wild chromosome arms individually examined has confirmed a higher chance of gene escape from the wheat A genome. However, a wide variation regarding the amount of wheat-wild MI pairing among the specific wheat chromosome regions under analysis suggests that the study should be extended to other homoeologous groups.

References

  1. Theor Appl Genet. 1996 Jul;93(1-2):242-8 [PMID: 24162224]
  2. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;109(1-3):210-4 [PMID: 15753579]
  3. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Dec 11;7(7):1869-85 [PMID: 537913]
  4. Theor Appl Genet. 1990 May;79(3):397-400 [PMID: 24226360]
  5. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;109(1-3):373-7 [PMID: 15753599]
  6. Genome. 2004 Dec;47(6):1173-81 [PMID: 15644976]
  7. Theor Appl Genet. 1991 Jul;82(4):441-9 [PMID: 24213260]
  8. Chromosoma. 2001 Sep;110(5):371-7 [PMID: 11685537]
  9. Heredity (Edinb). 1999 Sep;83 ( Pt 3):249-52 [PMID: 10504421]
  10. Genome. 2001 Dec;44(6):1000-6 [PMID: 11768203]
  11. Genome. 2000 Dec;43(6):1038-44 [PMID: 11195336]
  12. Nat Biotechnol. 2002 Jun;20(6):567-74 [PMID: 12042859]

MeSH Term

Chromosomes, Plant
Crosses, Genetic
DNA, Plant
Gene Transfer Techniques
Genes, Plant
Genetic Variation
Genome, Plant
In Situ Hybridization
Poaceae
Triticum

Chemicals

DNA, Plant

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0wildcroppairingMIwheatrelativegenehomoeologousgenomepatternhybridsgenomicwheat-wildchromosomepotentialfrequencyexaminedAegilopsgeniculatainterspecifichybridizationBgenotypeHoweverassociationprobes1Ughybridizesstabletransmissiondirectlyrelatedcrop-wildchromosomalregionlocatedwithinPairingmetaphasedurumx2n=4x=ABUgMgmeansin-situprocedureresultedsimultaneousdiscriminationgenomeslevelvariedgreatlydependingsimilarclose60%combinationsA-wildrepresented80-85%associationssupportsaveragesequencesmuchlikelytransferredfollowingbackcrossingCombinationDNAribosomalpTa71probealloweddeterminebehaviourmajorNOR-bearingchromosomes6B5addition4AidentifiedsoleusearmsindividuallyconfirmedhigherchanceescapewidevariationregardingamountamongspecificregionsanalysissuggestsstudyextendedgroupscytomolecularapproachassesstransferTriticumturgidumLRoth

Similar Articles

Cited By