Characteristics of forgetting functions in delayed matching to sample.

K G White
Author Information

Abstract

Performance of pigeons in delayed matching-to-sample procedures was measured in terms of an index of discriminability derived from the difference between logarithms of ratios of choice responses to comparison stimuli following the different sample stimuli. Forgetting functions that plotted discriminability as a function of delay-interval duration were well described by a simple negative exponential function with two parameters, one describing initial discriminability of sample stimuli at zero delay (log d(0)) and the other describing rate of decrement in discriminability with increasing delay-interval duration (b). With the difference between wavelength values of the comparison stimuli held constant, a large difference between wavelengths of the sample stimuli resulted in a higher log d(0) value than that for a small difference between sample stimuli, without changing the rate of decrement in discriminability, b. An increase in the fixed-ratio requirement for sample-key responding produced an increase in log d(0) without affecting b, and interpolation of ambient illumination in the delay interval increased b without influencing log d(0). Both parameters changed when intertrial-interval duration was varied. The result of variation in the point of interpolation of ambient illumination in the delay interval indicated that levels of discriminability at longer delays were independent of discriminability levels at earlier delays, consistent with the properties of the exponential function. Functions relating performance to delay-interval duration were suggested to have two characteristics: discriminability of the sample stimuli in the absence of a delay between the stimuli and the behavior they occasion, and rate of attenuation in discriminability with increasing delay-interval duration.

References

  1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Jul;28(1):13-25 [PMID: 903742]
  2. Science. 1975 Feb 21;187(4177):662-4 [PMID: 1114318]
  3. Psychometrika. 1966 Dec;31(4):505-6 [PMID: 5232438]
  4. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Jan;39(1):87-106 [PMID: 6833942]
  5. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Nov;38(3):305-12 [PMID: 7175430]
  6. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1982 Oct;8(4):342-53 [PMID: 7175446]
  7. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1981 Oct;7(4):334-47 [PMID: 7288368]
  8. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Jan;33(1):39-49 [PMID: 7365403]
  9. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1980 Jul;6(3):217-37 [PMID: 7391750]
  10. Mem Cognit. 1980 May;8(3):231-46 [PMID: 7392950]
  11. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Sep;34(2):177-83 [PMID: 7411014]
  12. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jan;6(1):101-7 [PMID: 16811275]
  13. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jan;19(1):181-6 [PMID: 16811648]
  14. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231-42 [PMID: 16811782]
  15. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Sep;26(2):301-14 [PMID: 16811949]
  16. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Sep;28(2):171-9 [PMID: 16812024]
  17. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Mar;29(2):331-6 [PMID: 16812059]
  18. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Sep;30(2):153-62 [PMID: 16812094]
  19. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Sep;36(2):241-51 [PMID: 16812243]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0discriminabilitystimulisampledurationdifferencedelay-intervaldelaylogd0bfunctionratewithoutdelayedcomparisonfunctionsexponentialtwoparametersdescribingdecrementincreasingincreaseinterpolationambientilluminationintervallevelsdelaysPerformancepigeonsmatching-to-sampleproceduresmeasuredtermsindexderivedlogarithmsratioschoiceresponsesfollowingdifferentForgettingplottedwelldescribedsimplenegativeoneinitialzerowavelengthvaluesheldconstantlargewavelengthsresultedhighervaluesmallchangingfixed-ratiorequirementsample-keyrespondingproducedaffectingincreasedinfluencingchangedintertrial-intervalvariedresultvariationpointindicatedlongerindependentearlierconsistentpropertiesFunctionsrelatingperformancesuggestedcharacteristics:absencebehavioroccasionattenuationCharacteristicsforgettingmatching

Similar Articles

Cited By