The concept of coherence in attachment interviews: comparing attachment experts, linguists, and non-experts.

Mariëlle D Beijersbergen, Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marinus H Van Ijzendoorn
Author Information
  1. Mariëlle D Beijersbergen: Centre for Child and Family Studies, Leiden University, The Netherlands.

Abstract

Coherence is a central construct in attachment interviews. Nevertheless, the concept has never been the main focus of a study in the attachment field. The present study examined whether coherence in attachment interviews is defined differently by experts trained in attachment theory, by linguists, and by non-experts. The 72-item Coherence Q-sort (CQS) was used to determine the profile of a prototypical coherent interview. Results indicated that attachment experts could be reliably distinguished from the (combined) other groups: attachment experts emphasized quality and manner more than all other groups, linguists emphasized quantity and relevance more than attachment experts, and higher educated non-experts valued relevance more than attachment experts. Defining coherence in attachment interviews is thus more than just applying Grice's linguistic maxims; expertise in attachment theory is critical for defining interview coherence. Consequences for the coding of the AAI by non-attachment experts, as well as computer coding (im)possibilities are discussed.

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Female
Health Surveys
Humans
Interview, Psychological
Language
Linguistics
Middle Aged
Object Attachment
Pilot Projects

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0attachmentexpertscoherenceinterviewslinguistsnon-expertsCoherenceconceptstudytheoryinterviewemphasizedrelevancecodingcentralconstructNeverthelessnevermainfocusfieldpresentexaminedwhetherdefineddifferentlytrained72-itemQ-sortCQSuseddetermineprofileprototypicalcoherentResultsindicatedreliablydistinguishedcombinedgroups:qualitymannergroupsquantityhighereducatedvaluedDefiningthusjustapplyingGrice'slinguisticmaximsexpertisecriticaldefiningConsequencesAAInon-attachmentwellcomputerimpossibilitiesdiscussedinterviews:comparing

Similar Articles

Cited By