Intrathecal polymer-based interleukin-10 gene delivery for neuropathic pain.

Erin D Milligan, Ryan G Soderquist, Stephanie M Malone, John H Mahoney, Travis S Hughes, Stephen J Langer, Evan M Sloane, Steven F Maier, Leslie A Leinwand, Linda R Watkins, Melissa J Mahoney
Author Information
  1. Erin D Milligan: Department of Psychology, Campus Box 345, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309-0345, USA. erin.milligan@colorado.edu

Abstract

Research on communication between glia and neurons has increased in the past decade. The onset of neuropathic pain, a major clinical problem that is not resolved by available therapeutics, involves activation of spinal cord glia through the release of proinflammatory cytokines in acute animal models of neuropathic pain. Here, we demonstrate for the first time that the spinal action of the proinflammatory cytokine, interleukin 1 (IL-1) is involved in maintaining persistent (2 months) allodynia induced by chronic-constriction injury (CCI). The anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 can suppress proinflammatory cytokines and spinal cord glial amplification of pain. Given that IL-1 is a key mediator of neuropathic pain, developing a clinically viable means of long-term delivery of IL-10 to the spinal cord is desirable. High doses of intrathecal IL-10-gene therapy using naked plasmid DNA (free pDNA-IL-10) is effective, but the dose required limits its potential clinical utility. Here we show that intrathecal gene therapy for neuropathic pain is improved sufficiently using two, distinct synthetic polymers, poly(lactic-co-glycolic) and polyethylenimine, that substantially lower doses of pDNA-IL-10 are effective. In conclusion, synthetic polymers used as i.t. gene-delivery systems are well-tolerated and improve the long-duration efficacy of pDNA-IL-10 gene therapy.

Keywords

References

  1. Pain. 2006 Dec 15;126(1-3):294-308 [PMID: 16949747]
  2. Biomaterials. 2003 May;24(11):1969-76 [PMID: 12615487]
  3. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2005 Oct;61(3):171-80 [PMID: 15967653]
  4. Brain Behav Immun. 2007 Jul;21(5):686-98 [PMID: 17174526]
  5. Gene Ther. 1996 May;3(5):405-11 [PMID: 9156801]
  6. Brain Res. 2000 Apr 7;861(1):105-16 [PMID: 10751570]
  7. J Control Release. 2000 May 15;66(2-3):229-41 [PMID: 10742583]
  8. Pharm Res. 2003 Feb;20(2):221-8 [PMID: 12636160]
  9. Brain Res. 2004 Oct 29;1025(1-2):210-9 [PMID: 15464762]
  10. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005 Jun 5;90(5):614-20 [PMID: 15818564]
  11. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2003 Sep;3(6):903-10 [PMID: 12943449]
  12. Annu Rev Immunol. 2002;20:709-60 [PMID: 11861616]
  13. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Apr 1;109(4):1333-7 [PMID: 11964987]
  14. Pain. 2000 Feb;84(2-3):233-45 [PMID: 10666528]
  15. Mol Ther. 2004 Mar;9(3):318-27 [PMID: 15006598]
  16. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2005 Aug;5(8):1019-28 [PMID: 16050780]
  17. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005 Jul;4(7):581-93 [PMID: 16052241]
  18. Cell Tissue Res. 2003 Sep;313(3):259-69 [PMID: 12920643]
  19. Exp Neurol. 2005 Apr;192(2):444-62 [PMID: 15755561]
  20. J Control Release. 2002 Jul 18;82(1):105-14 [PMID: 12106981]
  21. Gene Ther. 2003 Jul;10(14):1179-88 [PMID: 12833127]
  22. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994 Dec 30;205(3):1907-15 [PMID: 7811281]
  23. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003 Jan;3(1):23-35 [PMID: 12511873]
  24. J Control Release. 2001 Sep 11;76(1-2):59-71 [PMID: 11532313]
  25. Early Hum Dev. 2000 Apr;58(1):25-39 [PMID: 10785334]
  26. Cell. 1997 Oct 31;91(3):295-8 [PMID: 9363937]
  27. J Biomed Mater Res. 1985 Mar;19(3):349-65 [PMID: 4077887]
  28. Neuroreport. 2002 May 7;13(6):791-4 [PMID: 11997688]
  29. Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Apr;21(8):2136-48 [PMID: 15869510]
  30. Eur Neurol. 1977;15(3):169-76 [PMID: 323019]
  31. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2005 Apr;59(3):449-59 [PMID: 15760725]
  32. Clin Immunol. 2004 Jul;112(1):45-53 [PMID: 15207781]
  33. Trends Neurosci. 2001 Aug;24(8):450-5 [PMID: 11476884]
  34. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 1;92(16):7297-301 [PMID: 7638184]
  35. Biomaterials. 2003 Aug;24(19):3311-31 [PMID: 12763459]
  36. J Pharm Sci. 1999 Jan;88(1):126-30 [PMID: 9874713]
  37. J Neurosci. 2003 Feb 1;23(3):1026-40 [PMID: 12574433]
  38. Immunity. 1999 Feb;10(2):137-42 [PMID: 10072066]
  39. J Immunol. 1996 Sep 1;157(5):2116-22 [PMID: 8757335]
  40. J Virol. 2001 Oct;75(19):9037-43 [PMID: 11533167]
  41. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Jul;6(7):521-32 [PMID: 15995723]
  42. Handb Clin Neurol. 2006;81:309-23 [PMID: 18808844]
  43. Pain. 2002 Jan;95(1-2):31-40 [PMID: 11790465]
  44. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003 Dec;2(12):973-85 [PMID: 14654796]
  45. Nat Immunol. 2004 Feb;5(2):190-8 [PMID: 14716310]
  46. Trends Neurosci. 2005 Feb;28(2):101-7 [PMID: 15667933]
  47. Annu Rev Immunol. 2001;19:683-765 [PMID: 11244051]
  48. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1994 Mar;189(3):243-58 [PMID: 8042766]
  49. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2005 Jul;57(7):851-60 [PMID: 15969944]
  50. J Neurosci. 2003 Sep 24;23(25):8692-700 [PMID: 14507968]
  51. J Drug Target. 2000;8(1):39-50 [PMID: 10761644]
  52. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 1999 Jun;19(6):563-73 [PMID: 10433356]
  53. Biomaterials. 1996 Jan;17(2):93-102 [PMID: 8624401]
  54. Hum Gene Ther. 1999 Nov 1;10(16):2689-700 [PMID: 10566897]
  55. Pain. 2006 May;122(1-2):17-21 [PMID: 16564626]
  56. Brain Res. 1998 May 18;793(1-2):1-6 [PMID: 9630472]
  57. Neuroscience. 2002;112(2):409-16 [PMID: 12044458]
  58. J Neurosci. 2001 Apr 15;21(8):2808-19 [PMID: 11306633]
  59. Pain. 1988 Apr;33(1):87-107 [PMID: 2837713]
  60. J Neurosci Methods. 1998 Apr 30;80(2):137-47 [PMID: 9667386]
  61. Mol Ther. 2001 May;3(5 Pt 1):673-82 [PMID: 11356072]
  62. Nature. 2001 Mar 22;410(6827):471-5 [PMID: 11260714]
  63. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003 Sep 22;38(2):165-72 [PMID: 13129651]
  64. Mol Pain. 2005 Feb 25;1:9 [PMID: 15813997]
  65. J Immunol. 2002 May 1;168(9):4711-20 [PMID: 11971021]
  66. J Biol Chem. 2004 Apr 23;279(17):17217-23 [PMID: 14757773]
  67. Pharm Res. 1999 Apr;16(4):509-13 [PMID: 10227704]
  68. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 May 15;29(10):1082-8 [PMID: 15131433]
  69. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005 Aug;5(8):629-40 [PMID: 16034365]
  70. Hum Gene Ther. 1996 Oct 20;7(16):1947-54 [PMID: 8930654]
  71. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2002 Mar;15(2):197-207 [PMID: 11849917]
  72. Pain. 2005 May;115(1-2):71-83 [PMID: 15836971]

Grants

  1. K02 DA015642/NIDA NIH HHS
  2. R01 DA018156/NIDA NIH HHS
  3. R01 DA018156-05/NIDA NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0painneuropathicspinaltherapygenecordproinflammatorypDNA-IL-10gliaclinicalcytokinescytokineIL-1allodyniainjuryIL-10deliverydosesintrathecalusingeffectivesyntheticpolymersResearchcommunicationneuronsincreasedpastdecadeonsetmajorproblemresolvedavailabletherapeuticsinvolvesactivationreleaseacuteanimalmodelsdemonstratefirsttimeactioninterleukin1involvedmaintainingpersistent2monthsinducedchronic-constrictionCCIanti-inflammatorycansuppressglialamplificationGivenkeymediatordevelopingclinicallyviablemeanslong-termdesirableHighIL-10-genenakedplasmidDNAfreedoserequiredlimitspotentialutilityshowimprovedsufficientlytwodistinctpolylactic-co-glycolicpolyethyleniminesubstantiallylowerconclusionuseditgene-deliverysystemswell-toleratedimprovelong-durationefficacyIntrathecalpolymer-basedinterleukin-10Gliachronicconstrictionpolymerplasmid-DNArats

Similar Articles

Cited By (59)