Measurement of equity sensitivity: a comparison of the Equity Sensitivity Instrument and Equity Preference Questionnaire.

Ted H Shore, Judy Strauss
Author Information
  1. Ted H Shore: Department of Marketing and Management, California State University, San Marcos, San Marcos, CA 92096-0001, USA. tshore@csusm.edu

Abstract

The psychometric properties of the Equity Sensitivity Instrument (Huseman, Hatfield, & Miles, 1985, 1987) and Equity Preference Questionnaire (Sauley & Bedeian, 2000) are compared. 173 undergraduate business majors completed several work attitude and personality measures. Results suggest that the Equity Preference Questionnaire may be a better measure of the equity sensitivity construct than the Equity Sensitivity Instrument which is typically used in research. Reliabilities for the scores on the Equity Sensitivity Instrument and Equity Preference Questionnaire were equivalent (coefficient alphas of .85 and .86, respectively); however, evidence for convergent and content validity was greater for the Equity Preference Questionnaire. Understanding individual differences in perceptions of equity and how best to measure these differences can affect workplace outcomes (e.g., turnover, employee engagement.

MeSH Term

Adult
Choice Behavior
Female
Humans
Male
Organizational Culture
Sensitivity and Specificity
Social Behavior
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0EquityPreferenceQuestionnaireSensitivityInstrumentequity&measuredifferencespsychometricpropertiesHusemanHatfieldMiles19851987SauleyBedeian2000compared173undergraduatebusinessmajorscompletedseveralworkattitudepersonalitymeasuresResultssuggestmaybettersensitivityconstructtypicallyusedresearchReliabilitiesscoresequivalentcoefficientalphas8586respectivelyhoweverevidenceconvergentcontentvaliditygreaterUnderstandingindividualperceptionsbestcanaffectworkplaceoutcomesegturnoveremployeeengagementMeasurementsensitivity:comparison

Similar Articles

Cited By