The nosocomial transmission rate of animal-associated ST398 meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Martin C J Bootsma, Marjan W M Wassenberg, Pieter Trapman, Marc J M Bonten
Author Information
  1. Martin C J Bootsma: Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematics, Utrecht University, CD Utrecht, The Netherlands. m.c.j.bootsma@uu.nl

Abstract

The global epidemiology of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is characterized by different clonal lineages with different epidemiological behaviour. There are pandemic hospital clones (hospital-associated (HA-)MRSA), clones mainly causing community-acquired infections (community-associated (CA-)MRSA, mainly USA300) and an animal-associated clone (ST398) emerging in European and American livestock with subsequent spread to humans. Nosocomial transmission capacities (R(A)) of these different MRSA types have never been quantified. Using two large datasets from MRSA outbreaks in Dutch hospitals (dataset 1, the UMC Utrecht for 144 months; dataset 2, 51 hospitals for six months) and a recently developed mathematical model, we determined the genotype-specific R(A) for ST398 and non-ST398 isolates (categorized as HA-MRSA), using observational data, the detection rate of MRSA carriage and the discharge rate from hospital as the input. After detection of 42 MRSA index cases in dataset 1 (all non-ST398 MRSA) 5076 people were screened, yielding 30 secondary cases. In dataset 2, 75 index cases (51 non-ST398 MRSA and 24 ST398) resulted in 7892 screened individuals and 56 and three secondary cases for non-ST398 MRSA and ST398, respectively. The ratio between discharge and the detection rate was 2.7. R(A) values (95% confidence interval (CI)) were 0.68 (0.47-0.95) for non-ST398 MRSA in dataset 1, 0.93 (0.71-1.21) for non-ST398 MRSA in dataset 2 and 0.16 (0.04-0.40) for ST398. The R(A) ratio between non-ST398 MRSA and ST398 was 5.90 (95% CI 2.24-23.81). ST398 is 5.9 times less transmissible than non-ST398 MRSA in Dutch hospitals, which may allow less stringent transmission-control measures for ST398 MRSA.

References

  1. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 Mar;14(3):479-83 [PMID: 18325267]
  2. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Mar 15;46(6):787-94 [PMID: 18266611]
  3. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008 Dec 6;152(49):2681-8 [PMID: 19137969]
  4. Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Mar 1;42(5):647-56 [PMID: 16447110]
  5. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Aug 10;169(15):1372-8 [PMID: 19667299]
  6. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2006 Nov 10;5:26 [PMID: 17096847]
  7. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003 Sep;24(9):679-85 [PMID: 14510251]
  8. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008 Jul;62(1):109-15 [PMID: 18397923]
  9. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009 Feb;15(2):285-7 [PMID: 19193274]
  10. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005 Dec;11(12):1965-6 [PMID: 16485492]
  11. Lancet. 2006 Sep 2;368(9538):874-85 [PMID: 16950365]
  12. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2006 Feb 09;5:2 [PMID: 16469106]
  13. Vet Microbiol. 2008 Jan 25;126(4):383-9 [PMID: 17765409]
  14. J Med Microbiol. 2007 Aug;56(Pt 8):1107-1109 [PMID: 17644720]
  15. Clin Infect Dis. 2001 May 15;32(10):1393-8 [PMID: 11317238]
  16. Vet Microbiol. 2008 Apr 30;128(3-4):298-303 [PMID: 18023542]
  17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 4;103(14):5620-5 [PMID: 16565219]
  18. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Dec;29(12):1230-4 [PMID: 19173970]
  19. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 Sep;14(9):1383-9 [PMID: 18760004]
  20. J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Jul;41(7):3163-6 [PMID: 12843058]
  21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jul 6;101(27):10223-8 [PMID: 15220470]
  22. Math Biosci. 2009 May;219(1):15-22 [PMID: 19233215]
  23. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Mar 7;144(5):309-17 [PMID: 16520471]
  24. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Apr 1;48(7):910-3 [PMID: 19231982]
  25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 May 28;99(11):7687-92 [PMID: 12032344]
  26. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005 Dec;5(12):751-62 [PMID: 16310147]
  27. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Sep;10(9):1627-34 [PMID: 15498166]
  28. PLoS One. 2009;4(1):e4258 [PMID: 19145257]
  29. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007 Sep;5(9):700-9 [PMID: 17703226]
  30. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Mar;30(3):233-41 [PMID: 19199535]

MeSH Term

Animals
Communicable Disease Control
Cross Infection
Disease Outbreaks
Hospitals
Humans
Livestock
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Netherlands
Staphylococcal Infections

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MRSAST398non-ST398dataset02Rratecasesdifferenthospitals1detectionmeticillin-resistantStaphylococcusaureushospitalclonesmainlyanimal-associatedtransmissionDutchmonths51dischargeindexscreenedsecondaryratio95%CI5lessglobalepidemiologycharacterizedclonallineagesepidemiologicalbehaviourpandemichospital-associatedHA-causingcommunity-acquiredinfectionscommunity-associatedCA-USA300cloneemergingEuropeanAmericanlivestocksubsequentspreadhumansNosocomialcapacitiestypesneverquantifiedUsingtwolargedatasetsoutbreaksUMCUtrecht144sixrecentlydevelopedmathematicalmodeldeterminedgenotype-specificisolatescategorizedHA-MRSAusingobservationaldatacarriageinput425076peopleyielding307524resulted7892individuals56threerespectively7valuesconfidenceinterval6847-0959371-1211604-0409024-23819timestransmissiblemayallowstringenttransmission-controlmeasuresnosocomial

Similar Articles

Cited By (36)