Bone Loss Rate May Interact with Other Risk Factors for Fractures among Elderly Women: A 15-Year Population-Based Study.

Joonas Sirola, Anna-Kaisa Koistinen, Kari Salovaara, Toni Rikkonen, Marjo Tuppurainen, Jukka S Jurvelin, Risto Honkanen, Esko Alhava, Heikki Kr��ger
Author Information
  1. Joonas Sirola: Bone and Cartilage Research Unit (BCRU), University of Kuopio, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.

Abstract

Aim was to investigate fracture risk (FR) according to bone loss (BL) rate. A random sample of 1652 women aged 53.5 years was measured with dual X-ray absorptiometry in femoral neck in 1989 and 1994 and divided into tertiles of annual BL rate: high >0.84%, moderate 0.13%-0.84%, and low <0.13%. Low trauma energy fractures during following 10 years were recorded. There were no differences in FR between BL tertiles in Cox regression model. Factors predicting lower FR in Cox model were in high tertile: high T-score (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.54-0.93, P = .012), no sister's fracture (HR 0.35; 0.19-0.64, P = .001), no mother's fracture (HR 0.52; 0.31-0.88, P = .015), in moderate tertile: high T-score (HR 0.69;0.53-0.91, P = .008) and good grip strength (HR 0.98; 0.97-0.99, P = .022). In low tertile there were no predictors for FR. BL predicted FR in women with mother's fracture in univariate and multivariate model (OR 2.6; 1.15-5.7, P = .021) but with sister's fracture this was observed only in multivariate model (OR 2.66; 1.09-6.7, P = .039). Accordingly, the risk factors for postmenopausal fractures, especially mother's fracture, may interact with BL.

References

  1. Ann Intern Med. 1995 Jan 1;122(1):9-16 [PMID: 7985914]
  2. Bone. 2004 Jan;34(1):195-202 [PMID: 14751578]
  3. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(10):840-6 [PMID: 11199187]
  4. JAMA. 2002 Jul 17;288(3):321-33 [PMID: 12117397]
  5. J Bone Miner Res. 2005 Jul;20(7):1185-94 [PMID: 15940371]
  6. Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Sep 1;150(5):511-6 [PMID: 10472951]
  7. Osteoporos Int. 2005 Nov;16(11):1330-8 [PMID: 15928804]
  8. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 Oct;93(1-2):102-7 [PMID: 15316789]
  9. N Engl J Med. 1995 Mar 23;332(12):767-73 [PMID: 7862179]
  10. Med J Aust. 1993 Aug 16;159(4):232-6 [PMID: 8412889]
  11. JAMA. 2001 Dec 12;286(22):2815-22 [PMID: 11735756]
  12. Bone. 2004 Nov;35(5):1029-37 [PMID: 15542027]
  13. Menopause. 2008 Mar-Apr;15(2):282-9 [PMID: 17998884]
  14. Osteoporos Int. 2005 Jul;16(7):737-42 [PMID: 15455194]
  15. Osteoporos Int. 2007 Sep;18(9):1157-75 [PMID: 17534537]
  16. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Feb;194(2 Suppl):S3-11 [PMID: 16448873]
  17. Calcif Tissue Int. 2006 Apr;78(4):218-26 [PMID: 16604281]
  18. Osteoporos Int. 1999;10(2):161-6 [PMID: 10501797]
  19. Osteoporos Int. 1992 May;2(3):135-40 [PMID: 1627900]
  20. Maturitas. 1998 Nov 30;31(1):45-54 [PMID: 10091204]
  21. Bone. 2004 Aug;35(2):375-82 [PMID: 15268886]
  22. Osteoporos Int. 2001;12(8):630-8 [PMID: 11580076]
  23. Lancet. 2002 May 18;359(9319):1761-7 [PMID: 12049882]
  24. Calcif Tissue Int. 2008 Aug;83(2):93-100 [PMID: 18641912]
  25. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2005 Jul;17(4):456-61 [PMID: 15956843]
  26. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(9):1404-9 [PMID: 16699736]
  27. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999 Feb;84(2):546-52 [PMID: 10022414]
  28. J Bone Miner Res. 2003 Jun;18(6):1036-42 [PMID: 12817756]
  29. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Feb;90(2):241-8 [PMID: 18245581]
  30. Osteoporos Int. 2009 Apr;20(4):557-65 [PMID: 18661087]
  31. Calcif Tissue Int. 1994 Jul;55(1):1-7 [PMID: 7922782]
  32. Osteoporos Int. 2005 Dec;16(12):2013-7 [PMID: 16091836]
  33. N Engl J Med. 2006 May 25;354(21):2250-61 [PMID: 16723616]
  34. J Hand Surg Br. 2004 Feb;29(1):82-4 [PMID: 14734079]
  35. Calcif Tissue Int. 2003 Jun;72(6):659-65 [PMID: 14562993]
  36. Osteoporos Int. 1998;8(6):557-62 [PMID: 10326061]
  37. Osteoporos Int. 2008 Apr;19(4):385-97 [PMID: 18292978]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.00P=fractureFRBLHRhighmodelmother'sriskwomenyearstertiles84%moderatelowfracturesCoxFactorstertile:T-scoresister'smultivariateOR217Aiminvestigateaccordingbonelossraterandomsample1652aged535measureddualX-rayabsorptiometryfemoralneck19891994dividedannualrate:>013%-0<013%Lowtraumaenergyfollowing10recordeddifferencesregressionpredictinglower7195%CI54-0930123519-0640015231-0880156953-091008goodgripstrength9897-099022tertilepredictorspredictedunivariate615-5021observed6609-6039AccordinglyfactorspostmenopausalespeciallymayinteractBoneLossRateMayInteractRiskFracturesamongElderlyWomen:15-YearPopulation-BasedStudy

Similar Articles

Cited By