Time-sharing in rats: effect of distracter intensity and discriminability.

Catalin V Buhusi
Author Information
  1. Catalin V Buhusi: Department of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, 173 Ashley Avenue, 403 Basic Science Bldg., Charleston, SC 29425, USA. buhusi@musc.edu

Abstract

Interruptions (gaps) and unfamiliar events (distracters) during a timed signal delay the timed response of humans and other animals. To explore this phenomenon, we manipulate the intensity of auditory distracters (Experiment 1), and we dissociate the role of distracter intensity, distracter similarity with the intertrial interval, and dissimilarity from the timed auditory signal (Experiment 2). When the intertrial interval and the timed signal were silent, the delay in response after an auditory distracter increased with its intensity: Rats ignored (ran through) a 40-dB distracter, stopped timing during a 75-dB distracter, and reset after a 100-dB distracter. However, when timing was signaled by a 70-dB noise, rats reset both for 40- and 100-dB distracters, stopped for both 55- and 85-dB distracters, and run for the 70-dB distracter. Data are accounted for by a time-sharing model assuming 2 concurrent processes-time accumulation and memory decay controlled by the discriminability of the interrupting event-whose interplay results in a continuum of responses, from run to reset.

References

  1. Behav Processes. 1998 Dec;44(2):127-45 [PMID: 24896971]
  2. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Jul;32(3):329-38 [PMID: 16834500]
  3. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Jul 12;364(1525):1875-85 [PMID: 19487190]
  4. Behav Neurosci. 2002 Apr;116(2):291-7 [PMID: 11996314]
  5. Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:115-44 [PMID: 12415075]
  6. Behav Processes. 2000 Jul 7;50(1):1-7 [PMID: 10925031]
  7. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Oct;36(4):443-55 [PMID: 20718550]
  8. Behav Processes. 1999 Apr;45(1-3):159-71 [PMID: 24897534]
  9. Behav Processes. 2002 May 28;58(1-2):79-90 [PMID: 11955773]
  10. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1989 Jan;15(1):23-35 [PMID: 2926333]
  11. J Comp Psychol. 2002 Dec;116(4):381-90 [PMID: 12539934]
  12. Behav Processes. 2006 Feb 28;71(2-3):116-25 [PMID: 16414210]
  13. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1984;423:52-77 [PMID: 6588812]
  14. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1984;423:528-41 [PMID: 6588813]
  15. Behav Processes. 1998 Dec;44(2):183-95 [PMID: 24896974]
  16. Behav Neurosci. 1984 Feb;98(1):3-22 [PMID: 6696797]
  17. Behav Processes. 2006 Feb 28;71(2-3):107-15 [PMID: 16413701]
  18. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2000 Jul;26(3):305-22 [PMID: 10913995]
  19. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1986 Dec;25(6):1185-9 [PMID: 2880350]
  20. Front Integr Neurosci. 2011 Sep 23;5:52 [PMID: 21977014]
  21. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1994 Apr;20(2):184-98 [PMID: 8189187]
  22. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1981 Jul;7(3):242-68 [PMID: 7252428]
  23. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Jan;31(1):18-30 [PMID: 15656724]
  24. Behav Processes. 2004 Jan 30;65(1):43-56 [PMID: 14744546]
  25. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2002 Oct;28(4):416-22 [PMID: 12395499]
  26. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Oct;6(10):755-65 [PMID: 16163383]
  27. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1984;423:566-82 [PMID: 6588815]
  28. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1996 Jun;3(3-4):227-42 [PMID: 8806025]
  29. Front Integr Neurosci. 2011 Oct 31;5:67 [PMID: 22065383]

Grants

  1. R01 MH073057-04/NIMH NIH HHS
  2. R01 MH073057/NIMH NIH HHS
  3. MH73057/NIMH NIH HHS
  4. R56 MH065561/NIMH NIH HHS
  5. R01 MH065561/NIMH NIH HHS
  6. MH65561/NIMH NIH HHS
  7. R01 MH065561-09/NIMH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Analysis of Variance
Animals
Attention
Computer Simulation
Conditioning, Operant
Discrimination, Psychological
Male
Models, Psychological
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Reaction Time
Reinforcement Schedule
Reinforcement, Psychology
Statistics, Nonparametric
Time Factors
Time Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0distracterdistracterstimedsignalintensityauditoryresetdelayresponseExperimentintertrialinterval2stoppedtiming100-dB70-dBrundiscriminabilityInterruptionsgapsunfamiliareventshumansanimalsexplorephenomenonmanipulate1dissociaterolesimilaritydissimilaritysilentincreasedintensity:Ratsignoredran40-dB75-dBHoweversignalednoiserats40-55-85-dBDataaccountedtime-sharingmodelassumingconcurrentprocesses-timeaccumulationmemorydecaycontrolledinterruptingevent-whoseinterplayresultscontinuumresponsesTime-sharingrats:effect

Similar Articles

Cited By