Internet use for health-related information via personal computers and cell phones in Japan: a cross-sectional population-based survey.

Yoshimitsu Takahashi, Tomoko Ohura, Tatsuro Ishizaki, Shigeru Okamoto, Kenji Miki, Mariko Naito, Rie Akamatsu, Hiroki Sugimori, Nobuo Yoshiike, Koichi Miyaki, Takuro Shimbo, Takeo Nakayama
Author Information
  1. Yoshimitsu Takahashi: Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Internet is known to be used for health purposes by the general public all over the world. However, little is known about the use of, attitudes toward, and activities regarding eHealth among the Japanese population.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to measure the prevalence of Internet use for health-related information compared with other sources, and to examine the effects on user knowledge, attitudes, and activities with regard to Internet use for health-related information in Japan. We examined the extent of use via personal computers and cell phones.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of a quasi-representative sample (N = 1200) of the Japanese general population aged 15-79 years in September 2007. The main outcome measures were (1) self-reported rates of Internet use in the past year to acquire health-related information and to contact health professionals, family, friends, and peers specifically for health-related purposes, and (2) perceived effects of Internet use on health care.
RESULTS: The prevalence of Internet use via personal computer for acquiring health-related information was 23.8% (286/1200) among those surveyed, whereas the prevalence via cell phone was 6% (77). Internet use via both personal computer and cell phone for communicating with health professionals, family, friends, or peers was not common. The Internet was used via personal computer for acquiring health-related information primarily by younger people, people with higher education levels, and people with higher household incomes. The majority of those who used the Internet for health care purposes responded that the Internet improved their knowledge or affected their lifestyle attitude, and that they felt confident in the health-related information they obtained from the Internet. However, less than one-quarter thought it improved their ability to manage their health or affected their health-related activities.
CONCLUSIONS: Japanese moderately used the Internet via personal computers for health purposes, and rarely used the Internet via cell phones. Older people, people with lower education levels, and people with lower household incomes were less likely to access the Internet via cell phone. The Internet moderately improved users' health-related knowledge and attitudes but seldom changed their health-related abilities and activities. To encourage communication between health providers and consumers, it is important to improve eHealth literacy, especially in middle-aged people. It is also important to make adequate amendments to the reimbursement payment system and nationwide eHealth privacy and security framework, and to develop a collaborative relationship among industry, government, and academia.

References

  1. J Med Internet Res. 2010 Jun 11;12(2):e18 [PMID: 20542857]
  2. Med Care. 2007 Mar;45(3):245-51 [PMID: 17304082]
  3. Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 Nov-Dec;19(6):255-65 [PMID: 11192412]
  4. J Med Internet Res. 2001 Jan-Mar;3(1):E12 [PMID: 11720954]
  5. Med Care. 2005 Apr;43(4):415-20 [PMID: 15778645]
  6. JAMA. 2008 Jul 9;300(2):213-5 [PMID: 18612120]
  7. Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):24-8 [PMID: 16406474]
  8. J Med Internet Res. 2001 Apr-Jun;3(2):E20 [PMID: 11720962]
  9. J Med Internet Res. 2003 Dec 19;5(4):e33 [PMID: 14713661]
  10. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2011 May;23(3):386-98 [PMID: 19723690]
  11. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1214-9 [PMID: 20530358]
  12. Int J Public Health. 2007;52(5):275-85 [PMID: 18030943]
  13. JAMA. 2005 Mar 16;293(11):1310-2 [PMID: 15769951]
  14. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2011 May;58(5):361-71 [PMID: 21905612]
  15. J Health Commun. 2009 Sep;14(6):510-24 [PMID: 19731124]
  16. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2008 Aug;10(4):311-7 [PMID: 18627669]
  17. J Health Commun. 2007 Oct-Nov;12(7):667-80 [PMID: 17934943]
  18. J Med Internet Res. 2009 Dec 02;11(4):e49 [PMID: 19955041]
  19. J Nurs Res. 2005 Jun;13(2):129-40 [PMID: 15986314]
  20. J Med Internet Res. 2006 Jun 16;8(2):e9 [PMID: 16867972]
  21. Prev Chronic Dis. 2004 Oct;1(4):A13 [PMID: 15670445]
  22. J Health Commun. 2008 Jul-Aug;13(5):450-64 [PMID: 18661387]
  23. JAMA. 2003 May 14;289(18):2400-6 [PMID: 12746364]
  24. Science. 2010 Feb 12;327(5967):770-1 [PMID: 20150459]
  25. J Med Internet Res. 2008 Aug 25;10(3):e22 [PMID: 18725354]
  26. J Med Internet Res. 2003 Jul-Sep;5(3):e21 [PMID: 14517112]
  27. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Feb 19;51(7):771-2 [PMID: 18279743]
  28. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):714-22 [PMID: 19567794]
  29. J Med Internet Res. 2009 Jul 23;11(3):e29 [PMID: 19632979]
  30. Am J Infect Control. 2010 Apr;38(3):182-8 [PMID: 20347636]
  31. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Nov-Dec;11(6):499-504 [PMID: 15298993]
  32. BMJ. 2006 Dec 23;333(7582):1283-4 [PMID: 17185707]
  33. Am Fam Physician. 2005 Aug 1;72(3):463-8 [PMID: 16100861]
  34. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jul 28;163(14):1727-34 [PMID: 12885689]
  35. BMC Public Health. 2007 Apr 10;7:53 [PMID: 17425798]
  36. J Med Internet Res. 2005 Feb 24;7(1):e1 [PMID: 15829471]
  37. BMC Public Health. 2008 Aug 28;8:300 [PMID: 18755029]
  38. Med Inform Internet Med. 2007 Dec;32(4):305-14 [PMID: 18072007]
  39. J Med Internet Res. 2004 Sep 30;6(3):e36 [PMID: 15471762]
  40. Soc Sci Med. 2005 Apr;60(7):1467-78 [PMID: 15652680]
  41. J Health Commun. 2007 Dec;12(8):787-814 [PMID: 18030642]
  42. J Med Internet Res. 2007 Jul 12;9(3):e20 [PMID: 17627929]
  43. Int J Med Inform. 2006 Jan;75(1):29-41 [PMID: 16129659]
  44. J Med Internet Res. 2009 Feb 20;11(1):e4 [PMID: 19275980]
  45. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;:224-8 [PMID: 17238336]
  46. N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 4;362(9):859-60 [PMID: 20200398]
  47. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Dec 12-26;165(22):2618-24 [PMID: 16344419]
  48. J Med Internet Res. 2002 Apr-Nov;4(2):E7 [PMID: 12554554]
  49. J Med Internet Res. 2006 Nov 14;8(4):e27 [PMID: 17213046]
  50. J Med Internet Res. 2008 Nov 17;10(4):e42 [PMID: 19017584]

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Attitude to Computers
Cell Phone
Cross-Sectional Studies
Educational Status
Female
Humans
Information Services
Internet
Japan
Male
Medical Informatics
Microcomputers
Middle Aged
Public Health
Telemedicine
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0Internethealth-relateduseviahealthinformationpeoplepersonalcellusedpurposesactivitiesattitudeseHealthamongJapaneseprevalenceknowledgecomputersphonescomputerphoneimprovedknowngeneralHoweverpopulationeffectscross-sectionalsurveyprofessionalsfamilyfriendspeerscareacquiringhighereducationlevelshouseholdincomesaffectedlessmoderatelylowerimportantBACKGROUND:publicworldlittletowardregardingOBJECTIVES:studyaimedmeasurecomparedsourcesexamineuserregardJapanexaminedextentMETHODS:conductedquasi-representativesampleN=1200aged15-79yearsSeptember2007mainoutcomemeasures1self-reportedratespastyearacquirecontactspecifically2perceivedRESULTS:238%286/1200surveyedwhereas6%77communicatingcommonprimarilyyoungermajorityrespondedlifestyleattitudefeltconfidentobtainedone-quarterthoughtabilitymanageCONCLUSIONS:rarelyOlderlikelyaccessusers'seldomchangedabilitiesencouragecommunicationprovidersconsumersimproveliteracyespeciallymiddle-agedalsomakeadequateamendmentsreimbursementpaymentsystemnationwideprivacysecurityframeworkdevelopcollaborativerelationshipindustrygovernmentacademiaJapan:population-based

Similar Articles

Cited By