Changes in attention to relevant and irrelevant stimuli during spatial learning.

Steven F Cuell, Mark A Good, Jemma C Dopson, John M Pearce, Murray R Horne
Author Information
  1. Steven F Cuell: School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Rats were trained in 2 experiments to find a submerged platform that was situated in 1 of 2 of the 4 corners of a rectangular pool with a curved long wall. Different landmarks occupied 2 of the corners on every trial, and the platform was always situated near a landmark. For the place group in each experiment, the location of the platform was indicated by the shape of the pool and stimuli outside the pool (place cues), but not the landmarks within the pool. For the landmark groups, the landmarks, not the place cues, indicated where the platform could be found. During Stage 2, 2 of the place cues were relevant, and 2 of the landmarks were irrelevant, for a new discrimination. The place cues better controlled searching for the platform in the place group than in the landmark group when the place cues had initially been relevant by signaling the presence (Experiment 1) or the absence (Experiment 2) of the platform. The results show that animals pay more attention to relevant than irrelevant cues.

References

  1. Psychol Rev. 1980 Nov;87(6):532-52 [PMID: 7443916]
  2. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Apr;36(2):258-67 [PMID: 20384405]
  3. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007 Jul;33(3):191-212 [PMID: 17620021]
  4. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1964 Jun;57:357-61 [PMID: 14155371]
  5. J Exp Psychol. 1949 Dec;39(6):770-84 [PMID: 15398590]
  6. J Exp Psychol. 1950 Apr;40(2):175-88 [PMID: 15415514]
  7. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2003 Apr;29(2):143-52 [PMID: 12735278]
  8. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1997 Apr;23(2):194-210 [PMID: 9095542]
  9. Learn Behav. 2008 Aug;36(3):188-99 [PMID: 18683464]
  10. Q J Exp Psychol B. 2004 Jul;57(3):193-243 [PMID: 15204108]
  11. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Oct;36(4):456-70 [PMID: 20718552]
  12. Anim Learn Behav. 1976 May;4(2):197-203 [PMID: 964446]
  13. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Jul;36(3):381-94 [PMID: 20658869]
  14. Psychol Rev. 1987 Jan;94(1):61-73 [PMID: 3823305]
  15. Psychol Rev. 1994 Oct;101(4):587-607 [PMID: 7984708]
  16. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2008 Jul;34(3):419-22 [PMID: 18665724]
  17. Q J Exp Psychol B. 1988 Nov;40(4):321-41 [PMID: 3145534]
  18. Behav Processes. 1985 Mar;10(3):285-95 [PMID: 24924244]
  19. Learn Behav. 2010 Nov;38(4):337-47 [PMID: 21048225]
  20. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1997 Apr;23(2):183-93 [PMID: 9095541]
  21. Learn Behav. 2011 Dec;39(4):336-49 [PMID: 21499985]

Grants

  1. /Wellcome Trust
  2. 087855/Wellcome Trust
  3. BB/H006176/1/Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

MeSH Term

Analysis of Variance
Animals
Attention
Cues
Discrimination Learning
Escape Reaction
Male
Rats
Reaction Time
Space Perception
Spatial Behavior

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.02placeplatformcuespoollandmarksrelevantlandmarkgroupirrelevantsituated1cornersindicatedstimuliExperimentattentionRatstrainedexperimentsfindsubmerged4rectangularcurvedlongwallDifferentoccupiedeverytrialalwaysnearexperimentlocationshapeoutsidewithingroupsfoundStagenewdiscriminationbettercontrolledsearchinginitiallysignalingpresenceabsenceresultsshowanimalspayChangesspatiallearning

Similar Articles

Cited By