When zebras become painted donkeys: Grammatical gender and semantic priming interact during picture integration in a spoken Spanish sentence.

Nicole Y Y Wicha, Araceli Orozco-Figueroa, Iliana Reyes, Arturo Hernandez, Lourdes Gavaldón de Barreto, Elizabeth A Bates
Author Information
  1. Nicole Y Y Wicha: University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Abstract

This study investigates the contribution of grammatical gender to integrating depicted nouns into sentences during on-line comprehension, and whether semantic congruity and gender agreement interact using two tasks: naming and semantic judgement of pictures. Native Spanish speakers comprehended spoken Spanish sentences with an embedded line drawing, which replaced a noun that either made sense or not with the preceding sentence context and either matched or mismatched the gender of the preceding article. In Experiment 1a (picture naming) slower naming times were found for gender mismatching pictures than matches, as well as for semantically incongruous pictures than congruous ones. In addition, the effects of gender agreement and semantic congruity interacted; specifically, pictures that were both semantically incongruous and gender mismatching were named slowest, but not as slow as if adding independent delays from both violations. Compared with a neutral baseline, with pictures embedded in simple command sentences like "Now please say ____", both facilitative and inhibitory effects were observed. Experiment 1b replicated these results with low-cloze gender-neutral sentences, more similar in structure and processing demands to the experimental sentences. In Experiment 2, participants judged a picture's semantic fit within a sentence by button-press; gender agreement and semantic congruity again interacted, with gender agreement having an effect on congruous but not incongruous pictures. Two distinct effects of gender are hypothesised: a "global" predictive effect (observed with and without overt noun production), and a "local" inhibitory effect (observed only with production of gender-discordant nouns).

References

  1. Cortex. 2003 Jun;39(3):483-508 [PMID: 12870823]
  2. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Aug 15;15(6):883-99 [PMID: 14511541]
  3. Mem Cognit. 2000 Jul;28(5):756-65 [PMID: 10983449]
  4. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Mar;30(2):483-97 [PMID: 14979819]
  5. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Jan;28(1):46-58 [PMID: 11831212]
  6. Cognition. 1997 Aug;64(2):115-52 [PMID: 9385868]
  7. J Psycholinguist Res. 1999 Nov;28(6):715-28 [PMID: 10510866]
  8. Percept Psychophys. 1995 Aug;57(6):847-62 [PMID: 7651809]
  9. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989 Jan;15(1):73-87 [PMID: 2522143]
  10. Psychophysiology. 1997 Nov;34(6):660-76 [PMID: 9401421]
  11. J Psycholinguist Res. 1999 Sep;28(5):515-35 [PMID: 10453482]
  12. J Psycholinguist Res. 2003 Jul;32(4):417-30 [PMID: 12964523]
  13. Mem Cognit. 1998 Nov;26(6):1292-303 [PMID: 9847552]
  14. Psychol Rev. 1997 Oct;104(4):801-38 [PMID: 9337631]
  15. J Psycholinguist Res. 2000 Jan;29(1):53-68 [PMID: 10723710]
  16. Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Jun;10(2):344-80 [PMID: 12921412]
  17. Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Feb;22(1):1-38; discussion 38-75 [PMID: 11301520]
  18. J Cogn Neurosci. 1992 Winter;4(1):15-22 [PMID: 23967854]
  19. J Psycholinguist Res. 1999 Nov;28(6):677-93 [PMID: 10510864]
  20. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Jul;12(4):556-68 [PMID: 10936910]
  21. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989 Sep;15(5):791-801 [PMID: 2528603]
  22. Psychophysiology. 1999 Jan;36(1):53-65 [PMID: 10098380]
  23. Mem Cognit. 1999 May;27(3):385-98 [PMID: 10355230]
  24. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Jan;27(1):202-24 [PMID: 11204098]
  25. Science. 1998 Apr 24;280(5363):572-4 [PMID: 9554845]
  26. Nature. 1975 Feb 6;253(5491):437-8 [PMID: 1110787]
  27. Cognition. 1992 Mar;42(1-3):107-42 [PMID: 1582154]
  28. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1980 Mar;6(2):174-215 [PMID: 7373248]
  29. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Sep;16(7):1272-88 [PMID: 15453979]
  30. Cognition. 1999 Dec 17;73(3):247-64 [PMID: 10585516]
  31. Cognition. 1999 Jan 1;69(3):313-35 [PMID: 10193050]
  32. Cognition. 1992 Mar;42(1-3):1-22 [PMID: 1582153]
  33. J Psycholinguist Res. 1999 Nov;28(6):623-48 [PMID: 10510862]
  34. J Psycholinguist Res. 1999 Nov;28(6):695-713 [PMID: 10510865]
  35. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997 Jul;23(4):807-28 [PMID: 9231431]
  36. Biol Psychol. 1980 Sep;11(2):99-116 [PMID: 7272388]
  37. Science. 1980 Jan 11;207(4427):203-5 [PMID: 7350657]
  38. J Psycholinguist Res. 1999 May;28(3):293-312 [PMID: 10344021]
  39. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1986 Sep;115(3):281-94 [PMID: 2944988]
  40. Percept Psychophys. 1996 Oct;58(7):992-1004 [PMID: 8920836]
  41. Mem Cognit. 1986 Mar;14(2):104-12 [PMID: 3724441]
  42. Mem Cognit. 1991 Jan;19(1):95-112 [PMID: 2017035]
  43. J Cogn Neurosci. 1996 Spring;8(2):89-106 [PMID: 23971417]
  44. Psychol Rev. 1997 Jan;104(1):123-47 [PMID: 9009882]
  45. Cognition. 1992 Mar;42(1-3):61-105 [PMID: 1582161]
  46. Neurosci Lett. 2003 Aug 7;346(3):165-8 [PMID: 12853110]
  47. Cogn Psychol. 1991 Apr;23(2):299-330 [PMID: 2055002]
  48. Cognition. 1980 Mar;8(1):1-71 [PMID: 7363578]
  49. Cognition. 1993 Jul;48(1):71-99 [PMID: 8403835]
  50. Neurosci Res. 2001 Nov;41(3):293-8 [PMID: 11672841]
  51. J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 May 15;13(4):510-22 [PMID: 11388923]
  52. J Psycholinguist Res. 1999 Sep;28(5):499-514 [PMID: 10453481]
  53. Percept Psychophys. 1994 Nov;56(5):590-8 [PMID: 7991355]
  54. J Psycholinguist Res. 2003 Jan;32(1):37-55 [PMID: 12647562]
  55. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989 Nov;15(6):1020-32 [PMID: 2530304]

Grants

  1. F31 DC000351/NIDCD NIH HHS
  2. R01 DC000216/NIDCD NIH HHS
  3. T32 MH018882/NIMH NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0gendersemanticpicturessentencesagreementcongruitynamingSpanishsentenceExperimentincongruouseffectsobservedeffectnounsinteractspokenembeddednouneitherprecedingpicturemismatchingsemanticallycongruousinteractedinhibitoryproductionstudyinvestigatescontributiongrammaticalintegratingdepictedon-linecomprehensionwhetherusingtwotasks:judgementNativespeakerscomprehendedlinedrawingreplacedmadesensecontextmatchedmismatchedarticle1aslowertimesfoundmatcheswellonesadditionspecificallynamedslowestslowaddingindependentdelaysviolationsComparedneutralbaselinesimplecommandlike"Nowpleasesay____"facilitative1breplicatedresultslow-clozegender-neutralsimilarstructureprocessingdemandsexperimental2participantsjudgedpicture'sfitwithinbutton-pressTwodistincthypothesised:"global"predictivewithoutovert"local"gender-discordantzebrasbecomepainteddonkeys:Grammaticalprimingintegration

Similar Articles

Cited By (6)